Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Prediction: 2008 Presidential Winner - Hillary Clinton/Mark Warner

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 11:59 AM
Original message
Prediction: 2008 Presidential Winner - Hillary Clinton/Mark Warner
Yes, the first woman president of the United States will be Hillary Clinton in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
revree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. No, it should be HELEN THOMAS
She kicks ass. But she is pretty old...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I also don't think she was born here, but I could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. I sincerely hope you are right!!!...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Would that be sweet?
The looks on Rush Limpballs and Annthrax Coulter's faces would be priceless.

Rush would go on a hunger strike and Annthrax would eat like a pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. hehehe...as long as Mark Warner is on the ticket....
...somewhere, I can get down with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. NOT
No repug-lite

The reason she is being pushed down our throats is that the other side KNOWS she cannot win.

She has less personality than Al Gore had in 2000, well, Gore was vanillia, she is offensive, so there is that personality.

I want Gore on the ticket.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I'll "repug-lite"
what ever the hell that is, over a carbon copy of that asshole in chief we have now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. I don't set my sights that low.
I won't "settle for better than what we got now" until that is my only choice. To accept that as our standard is pretty friggin pathetic.

I want true leadership and someone that believes in what this country should be and can be. Al Gore has that spirit. Hillary has compromised and kissed assed and adopted republican positions (repuke-lite) to appease. Leadership is not kissing ass to get somewhere, it is standing up and saying what must be said and trying to make a difference, imho.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. It better be a financial genius who can save the country from Bush
ineptitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldensilence Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. gore/clarke
:party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Clinton/Obama maybe....who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. As I said on your primary thread with the same prediction...
I think this is just idle speculation at this point.

But I think that applies even moreso to this thread. I think it's silly to call Clinton/Warner as the winner of the '08 election without thinking about who they'll face in that election, no?

On that note, who do you think they'll face in that election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
30. Prediction: 2008 Winner - Diebold
and that other crappin' company I forget the name of that owns our votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. Mark Warner/Wes Clark or Wes Clark/Mark Warner
would be much better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. That's what I am hoping for. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
31. Gore/Clark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
33. Agree, Hillary/Warner would be a loser
If Hillary were at the top of a ticket, no matter who the running mate is, she unifies the Rethugs as they've never been before, while angering the core of the Democratic Party who are against the pro-war, pro-corporatist consensus of the DLC (unless she changes her tune very quick). Warner, while apparently DLC himself, has somehow so far managed to avoid the worst of the DLC excesses and racked up a record of remarkable achievement as governor of Virginia. Still waiting to hear what he has to say about Iraq, but so far, he's doing well.

Warner/Clark or Clark/Warner would be a powerhouse in the Red States and Swing States, which is where we need to be focusing our efforts. This would be our strongest ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aaaargh Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. A very persuasive case!
On the face of it, it didn't really sound very likely to me, but when you back it up with all that carefully reasoned speculation ... well, there's just no doubt about it, is there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. !
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. Nope
She may win the nomination, but like kerry, will lose the generals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeanike Donating Member (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. nope
Edited on Wed Mar-08-06 02:06 PM by mikeanike
that may be the democratic nominee, but I maintain that we cannot defeat a gulliani/allen ticket. Do you guys understand how powerful that is? Ponder that for a second. That is fucking scary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. Why is this being posted again? Its very similar to other Hillary
/Warner post. What are you trying to do convience us that we don't have a choice in the matter and we might as well vote for her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. With all due respect, 2008 is mute.
Edited on Wed Mar-08-06 05:44 PM by politicasista
This country will be in such a bleeping mess, that we may have to look at substance over style and see who is the best person for the job, and for cleaning up this tragic mess left by this evil administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
20. Live the dream
but I doubt that is a realistic expectation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
21. What's the point of putting Mark Warner on the ticket?
He may walk on water in Virginia, and I believe he could carry the state if he were the party's nominee. But there's no way that Virginia goes blue if Hillary is the nominee. Moreover, I have a hard time thinking that Warner would have much interest in being VP. I suspect that if he doesn't get the party's nomination, he just might run for governor again in 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
22. And the Fortune 500 lets out a big sigh of relief
Edited on Wed Mar-08-06 05:56 PM by iconoclastNYC
Another corporatists Democrat. After eight years of Hillary the Green Party should have about 10 million members and our party will be just about dead.

"Enough. Enough triangulation, calculation and equivocation. Enough clever straddling, enough not offending anyone. This is not a Dick Morris election. Sen. Clinton is apparently incapable of taking a clear stand on the war in Iraq, and that alone is enough to disqualify her. Her failure to speak out on Terri Schiavo, not to mention that gross pandering on flag-burning, are just contemptible little dodges."

http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?ItemID=20250

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #22
32. Molly's right
the whole damn country is just waiting for someone with some guts to tell the truth...no bullshit, just the simple truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
23. Hill' would lose the election if nominated, even with Warner on the ticket
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
25. Nope.
She'll run hard but won't capture the nomination, with or without Warner on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
26. WHO KEEPS PUSHINNG THIS MESS!!!!!!
I am certainly not the first to say it....if the Dems nominate Hillary in 2008 it will be a death wish. I can only believe that it is Republicans who are pushing this BS! SHE CANNOT WIN!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
27. 'Would very strongly support a woman on the Dems' ticket in 08 but
would much prefer Senator Boxer to Senator Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwesty Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
28. Gore/Clinton
Is the only way she'll get my vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
29. Clark/Landrieu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC