Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A bill to amend the Patriot Act is introduced

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 05:41 PM
Original message
A bill to amend the Patriot Act is introduced
109th CONGRESS

2d Session

S . 2369
To require a more reasonable period for delayed-notice search warrants, to provide enhanced judicial review of FISA orders and national security letters, to require an enhanced factual basis for a FISA order, and to create national security letter sunset provisions.


IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

March 6, 2006
Mr. SPECTER (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. SUNUNU, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. SALAZAR, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. OBAMA, and Mr. KERRY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


A BILL
To require a more reasonable period for delayed-notice search warrants, to provide enhanced judicial review of FISA orders and national security letters, to require an enhanced factual basis for a FISA order, and to create national security letter sunset provisions.


Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON REASONABLE PERIOD FOR DELAY.

Section 3103a(b)(3) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking `30 days' and inserting `7 days'.

SEC. 2. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF FISA ORDERS AND NATIONAL SECURITY LETTERS.

(a) FISA- Subsection (f)(2) of section 501 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1861) is amended

(1) in subparagraph (A)(i)--

(A) by striking `a production order' and inserting `a production order or nondisclosure order'; and

(B) by striking `Not less than 1 year' and all that follows through the end of the clause;

(2) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by striking `production order or nondisclosure'; and

(3) in subparagraph (C), by striking clause (ii) and redesignating clause (iii) as clause (ii).

(b) Judicial Review of National Security Letters- Section 3511(b) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--

(1) in paragraph (2), by striking `If, at the time of the petition,' and all that follows through the end of the paragraph; and

(2) in paragraph (3), by striking `If the recertification that disclosure may' and all that follows through `made in bad faith.'.

SEC. 3. FACTUAL BASIS FOR REQUESTED ORDER.

Section 501(b)(2)(A) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1861(b)(2)(A)) is amended to read as follows:

`(A) a statement of facts showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the records or other things sought--

`(i) are relevant to an authorized investigation (other than a threat assessment) conducted in accordance with subsection (a)(2) to obtain foreign intelligence information not concerning a United States person or to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities; and

`(ii) either--

`(I) pertain to a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power;

`(II) are relevant to the activities of a suspected agent of a foreign power who is the subject of such authorized investigation; or

`(III) pertain to an individual in contact with, or known to, a suspected agent of a foreign power; and'.

SEC. 4. NATIONAL SECURITY LETTER SUNSET.

Section 102 of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (H.R. 3199, 109th Congress, 2d Session) is amended by adding at the end the following:

`(c) Other Sunsets-

`(1) IN GENERAL- Effective December 31, 2009, the following provisions are amended so that they read as they read on February 27, 2006:

`(A) Section 2709 of title 18, United States Code.

`(B) Sections 626 and 627 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681u, 1681v).

`(C) Section 1114 of the Right to Financial Privacy Act (12 U.S.C. 3414).

`(D) Section 802 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 436).

`(2) EXCEPTION- With respect to any particular foreign intelligence investigation that began before the date on which the provisions referred to in paragraph (1) cease to have effect, or with respect to any particular offense or potential offense that began or occurred before the date on which such provisions cease to have effect, such provisions shall continue in effect.'.

SEC. 5. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

Amendments to provisions of law made by this Act are to such provisions, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (H.R. 3199, 109th Congress, 2d Session) and by the USA PATRIOT Act Additional Reauthorizing Amendments Act of 2006 (S . 2271, 109th Congress, 2d Session).



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
katmondoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thats Good
I thought it was all over once the act passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. And STILL no media discussion of this bipartisan way to deal with the
Edited on Wed Mar-08-06 05:46 PM by blm
parts of the Patriot Act that really need the most changes. The media really plays the citizens for goobers, don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is it unrealistic to hope that this gets any attention...
let alone gets to the floor for a vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. remember, most of Senate passed a bill with more changes some months ago.
BushInc pressured the conference to take out the changes. I think these changes have a great chance of passing - I just don't expect media to help the cause and they will instead, ignore it and the efforts of those working for the changes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timbnyc44 Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Where are my Senators?
Jeez, you'd think Schumer and Clinton from New York would support such a thing...bad enough they voted for the extension!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. an enhanced factual basis for a FISA order ??
ok, and when this is ALTERED to include a cute little provision making bush's actions LEGAL by way of retroactivity? they'll use it to claim the democrats are ENDANGERING americans lives...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. Lisa Murkowski is very leery of the Act -
I believe she "went along to get along"; she was one of the few Repukes who voted against the extension. If she'd change parties, she'd be a decent human. As it is though.........

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC