Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is the political significance of today's events ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:02 PM
Original message
What is the political significance of today's events ?
With the Dubai port deal falling thru? Who lost the most? Who won the most? Are the repercussions of this deal now over or will they continue up to the election? Can the Democrats now make a rational argument that this White House and the Repubs cannot be trusted with our national security? If they would sell our ports, what else would they sell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dumbya lost big
This has exposed how weak his support in his own party is. It's made him look weak overseas.

Weak, weak, WEAK. BIIIIIIG loser ...

Now can the Dems capitalize on this? That's another story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jayhawk Lib Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I think us Dems lost on this one.
Bush is not running for reelection but the Repubs that are running again and appeared to stand up to him are the winners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. But the image of a party fighting with its "leader" isn't good
Especially during an election year. It makes them look divided (and perhaps gives us an advantage).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jayhawk Lib Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Perhaps !! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. It went just as Rove planned it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. absofreakinloutly eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. exactly - repukes got to show they stand up to prez on ports deal
they get to look "tough" and get a little distance between themselves and bush/cheney's lousy poll numbers also.

Works well for their re-election bids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I don't think so...
Rove doesn't make decisions that makes Dubya look weak...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Dumbya can't win anything anymore. To Rove it is all about
WINNING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. One step forward, two steps back.
Maybe a Bushco plan was stopped in its tracks. But has this strengthened the GOP legislators for standing up to Bushco? And more importantly what will become of the larger issue, port security? We did not have port security before,and stopping DPW will not change that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. We'll have to see who actually ends up with the contract
You know this will be watched. If it is Halliburton, or a subsidiary thereof, it could still spell trouble for them. If it is a shell company, and their true ties back to DPW are revealed, the blowback could be huge.

Even the wee cowboy knows that "Fool me once....unhhhh, hmmmm, shame on you............fool me twice....ummmm, unhhhhhh.....er, won't git fooled agin!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Republican corporatists are in a pickle
Because this episode has raised latent populist opposition to foreign ownership of assets to a frenzied pitch, to which can be added outsourcing and all the other pretty toys the globalists have been swishing through without much of a peep from the public.

Politicians now know that this potent brew of animosity toward globalism (in part) can be used to get votes....and it bodes poorly for corporatists interests. Their former alignment with the social issue republicans may be coming to an end. That potent alliance, we can all hope, may be in tatters, which could really help dems in 2006, if they don't insist on blowing it again by their usual baleful stares into the headlights of current events
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Usually the Party that agrees with 80% of the American people...
is considered the "winner"....But, for some reason, we can't accept that. For once, the Democrats kicked the Republicans asses! They were called on their arrogance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I disagree.....the Pukes got the better of this deal.
Dems made nowere near enough noise. Just sat back and let the Pukes get all the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. The answer isn't evident as of today.
We need to know and demand certain things and the way Republicans agree or fight it will reveal plenty.

We need to know what this Administration is going to do to prevent 'underlings' in four Cabints from making a decision such as this for that is what they claim - that the top guys in Homeland Sec, Treasury, DOD, and State didn't know anything and George said he didn't know anything. Are Dems going to allow this?

We need to know if Dubai will own it and to whom they will lease it out or if they are out completely. It is all fuzzy. What they come up with will undoubtedly benefit a certain few monetarily.

We need to show that Democrats can be just as 'patriotic' as Republicans so that there entire campaign to show us as disloyal goes away forever.

Any Dem candidates must use the port to expose the WH.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. One thing is for certain...
The American people cannot trust this Adminsitration to make decisions that are in the best interest of this nation. With those 4 Dept heads plus the President and VP behind the deal, it should be obvious to everyone just how out of touch they really are...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. We all gave the chimperor a long overdue and needed black eye.
:applause: :bounce: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC