Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who thinks Bush and Rove planned this whole fiasco ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:27 PM
Original message
Who thinks Bush and Rove planned this whole fiasco ?
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 10:31 PM by kentuck
With the port deal collapsing?

First, Bush comes out and says he will veto any legislation that tries to stop the sale. He doesn't talk strategy with the Repub simpletons in Congress, we know that. He doesn't give his secrets out to anyone, to wit, NSA secrets. Their skills are in spinning a debacle after it happens, to it being in their favor. So, how did he know the Repubs in Congrss would rebel against the plan? He could have anticipated some amt of Democratic resistance but that has never been a concern with the comatose media we have...So, I'm having a difficult time rationalizing how it could have been part of a plan? Perhaps someone can better explain it. I think they fucked up..bigtime!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Please. They aren't that smart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. You're giving them WAAaaAaaAY too much credit..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nope, it just shows that he's got no teeth left. Total failure. Ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think unintentionally
It probably started as a plain old globalization business deal. When it became a news story, they used it to allow congress to get all huffy and show they stood up to the WH. What better way to shore up the image of those running in 2006? Never underestimate your opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Suich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've been thinking that exact same thing!
Maybe shrub wanted a certain American "entity" to be in charge of the ports in the first place and this was just a way to guarantee it?

Something's fishy...have to wait and see what happens in the next week or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've read many people do believe that here, but I can't give
them that much credit; I'm hoping Rove is otherwise occupied with trying to cover his ass, to the detriment of his 'boss'.
IMO: They didn't have a clue, as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Although... Some are speculating it had nothing to do with '06 and...
...everything to do with Halliburton winding up with the contract in the end.

You never know.

They could be right about that. http://eliteleague.co.uk/forum/images/smilies/duh!.gif

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Then why wouldn't the British have sold it to Halliburton in first place
I could see Bush attempting to get the deal for Halliburton now, as a revenge motive, but I don't that was part of any plan in the beginning. They are very good at making lemonade out of lemons...but there is a shortage of sugar with these lemons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Beats me.. I just heard the possibility brought up on CNN today..
They didn't have any info of it actually happening, but one of the Democrats they interviewed today was asked "What happens now if it turns out that Halliburton bids and wins the contract?"

I hadn't even thought of Halliburton until CNN mentioned them.. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abburdlen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. I seriously doubt Bush planned anything
But it seems there is more going on with the port story than appears.

It just seems to me that the whole thing ended up making it look like congressional repubs could disagree with Bush and distance themselves from him on an issue that in the grand scheme of things didn't mean that much- compared to the NSA wiretapping for instance which they completely caved on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. The port thing has helped to destroy Bush's credibility
simple people couldn't figure why Bush wanted ports to be controlled by an Arab (remember all arabs are terrorists) country?:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigYawn Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's becoming clear now....Haliburton will now get the job
Rove figured out if Haliburton got the job
in the first place there would be resistance.
Now that congress has rejected Dubai Ports Co.
the job, there will be minimal resistance as
Haliburton is awarded the contract.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drduffy Donating Member (739 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. the neocons ARE that smart
and I am with Mike Malloy on this one. This was a plan and the neocons executed it perfectly. Just my humble opinion but If you think otherwise you ain't been watchin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. While it is proper to respect the skills of your enemy....
I think it can also be counter-productive to give them too much credit, because in the process, you minimize your own efforts and ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandrakae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. I definitely smell a rat,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moody Bluz Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I think some of this may be our fault.
We have been so frustrated since Chimpy McCokespoon took office, that we almost blindly stampede when we see an opening. You can blame Rove for a lot of things, but you cannot call him stupid. Don't you think that just maybe, Rove knew that this would cause an uproar.

This is the exact same strategy he used to get Alito. Put Miers out there, there was a huge outcry then Alito pretty much sails through. Same thing with the ports. They are going to Dubai. Both sides of the aisle go completely nuts. Now Haliburton takes them and it even looks like a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
17. king george couldn't plan taking a crap
without messing his pants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
18. I thjink the plan went like this....
1. Congress would kill the Dubai deal.

2. Bush would veto that.

3. Congress would overturn his veto.

The result: Bush, who is not running for anything, is made less popular. Congress, including Repubs, are heroes for stopping the deal.

Perfect timing and issue for this fall's elections.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC