|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 09:33 AM Original message |
Jobs numbers: Does anyone really believe this crap?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
1. Possibly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calmblueocean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 09:44 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 09:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. They aren't subtracting jobs they need to create for population growth! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaoar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 11:28 AM Response to Reply #8 |
19. To account for population growth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 10:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
13. places like Swift Trucking with 22,000 drivers have 110% annual turnover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
serryjw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 10:52 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. OMG I never heard that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 11:33 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. I worked for them for a while, my trainer was so inexperienced he almost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 12:50 PM Response to Reply #15 |
28. that is what they told me in Orientation... google it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 11:31 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. That is a news flash! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Southsideirish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 12:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
25. Just crappy Mcjobs - I don't consider something a "real" job unless it has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
2. Those jobs must be in India. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
3. job creation and unemployment are not direct offsets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
5. What they are telling is the number of new jobs created in a given period |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
6. maybe they included the Mariana sweatshops? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hollowdweller (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
7. There's plenty jobs. Most folks have to have at least two anymore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
9. America would have more jobs if they had not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
10. No it doesn't make sense and someone ought to call them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
11. in my little corner of northern illinois |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTwentyoNine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
12. Loose your unemployment **POOF** you just got a job.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 10:44 AM Response to Original message |
14. those figures are "First Time " unemployed, you are only counted once.! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
serryjw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 10:59 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. please give me a link to that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
area51 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
16. "Jobs numbers: Does anyone really believe this crap??" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 11:38 AM Response to Reply #16 |
22. See?? You are (for which I must say I'm very sorry) exactly the type of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
17. I wonder if those who join the military are considered new jobs? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 11:52 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. I'm sure they are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Southsideirish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 12:02 PM Response to Reply #17 |
26. Reagan was the first one to throw the military into the ranks of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harald Ragnarsson (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
24. Two booming industries are skewing the numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gizmo1979 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-11-06 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
27. I don't believe any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC