Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why don't Feingold and Conyers team up?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
election_2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 01:55 AM
Original message
Why don't Feingold and Conyers team up?
With Russ Feingold calling for a presidential censure, and John Conyers continuing his attempts at impeachment, wouldn't it make sense for these two progressive warriors to pool their resources and organize a contingency of joint House & Senate Democrats to publicly call Bush on his shit?

Sure, they may not get the Liebermans or the Ben Nelsons behind them, but even a sizable chunk of the Democratic Caucus would force the media to keep this in the headlines (rather than ignoring it).

Instead, the MSM seems to be trying to set up Feingold as "the Howard Dean of 2008" (i.e. "some ranting wacko who no one takes seriously"), with the underlying assumption that Conyers is already NOT taken seriously (oh, he's just "that black liberal congressman from Detroit").

I, personally, would love to see Howard Dean sit down with Conyers and Feingold, and strategize about how to rally the grassroots and the Dem leadership to take Bush head-on as we move into this next critical election cycle (the 2006 midterms). Being polite and playing nice is NOT going to win back the U.S. House or the U.S. Senate for Democrats.

I also cannot wait to see my senator (Feingold) be named as Wes Clark's or Mark Warner's vice-presidential running mate in 2008, and then see Conyers tapped as the new Attorney General in January 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pam-Moby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes Feingold, Conyers rocks.
I would love to see Gore, included in the mix someplace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think this is a good idea.
They could confer with each other, strategize, and just generally support each other. And yes, Dean would be a good addition to those meetings. Pull others into a growing inner circle as each is ready and after each has passed a rigorous intiation ceremony! I'm thinking torches, dolls, and pushpins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. Now the House has its Censure Resolution and the Senate has its.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. From Conyers:---Feingold Has Just Joined Me Calling for Censure
Edited on Tue Mar-14-06 02:08 AM by rodeodance
I posted this earlier.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=654527&mesg_id=654986

Tue Mar-14-06 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
94. From Conyers:---Feingold Has Just Joined Me Calling for Censure




Senator Feingold Has Just Joined Me Calling for Censure

On ABC's This week with George Stephanopolous, Senator Russell Feingold has just joined my call for censure of the President. Many of you remember that I introduced a resolution, House Resolution 637, last December to censure the President at the same time I introduced House Resolution 635 to investigate the President's Administration for possible impeachable offenses. The Senator announced on the show that he planned to introduce his bill at the beginning of the week.

As you know, the Senate tends to move much more slowly on issues such as these. While Senator Feingold has not come to the same position as I have - calling for a special committee to investigate impeachable offenses - he didn't rule it out. And when asked, he didn't rule out pressing for impeachment. It is a good sign that there are others catching up with us in the call for accountability for this White House. While some are impatient for immediate action, we need to understand that pursuing this in a measured fashion will give us the best chance of success. The emergence of Senator Feingold in taking this stand is a broad and positive step toward our ultimate goal.

Link:

http://www.conyersblog.us/archives/00000400.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Feingold Shouldn't Be Anybody's Running Mate. FEINGOLD FOR PRESIDENT!
He's the best we've got.

After today's speech, can there be any doubt of this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. His clarity of thought and apparent integrity are such
enormous surprises in this era of slack jawed, spaghetti spined greed. Quite frankly, he is larger than life, given the circumstances, and I stand in awe. (Salute)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
election_2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Well, I'm thinking if he doesn't win the primaries...
I think a Clark/Feingold or Warner/Feingold ticket would be more appealing than a Clinton/Feingold ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. There will come the time! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. Dat's What I'm talkin'bout!
;)

FEINGOLD/CONYERS 2008!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. The Media Can Possibly Get away with it in Feingold's case..
He has an understated demenor, and his passion is expressed with just the right measure of brevity.. it can't possibly be distorted ...

not even in the brazen cm..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC