republicans objection to censure so telling

[BOSSHOG]

Do they say that bush did not commit a crime and he was right in breaking the law? No! They say the same old thing. We are at war therefore bush can get away with whatever he wants. This only strengthens the MIHOP argument. What would be the basis of their bush enabling if we weren't at war (which is where we should be?)

And the civil war and the denials from the white house continue.

And to make their task easier, they are preening for an ignorant, cowardly, falsely patriotic base.

[ClassWarrior]

1. Call your Senators, Dems and Cons alike, and ask them this...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2512789&mesg_id=2512789

NGU.

[BOSSHOG]

2. Roger that

The arrogant staffers at my senators, lott and cochran's office gaff me off at every opportunity.

[BR_Parkway]

3. I've got Burr and Dole - so I pretend to be another outraged Republican

I figure at least they'll listen that way.

"But I thought Republicans were the party of Law & Order/Personal Responsibilty? I'm tired of what you people are doing to my party. I can't support this until you get back to being true conservatives, not this hijacked Theocracy you seem bent on pushing"

[FloridaPat]

4. I am having a big problem here. When they interogated Gonzolas,

he stressed that we are not at war - * engaged in military action approved by congress. So that would mean * is not guilty of war crimes? Anyway - there is no need to protest * since we're not a war.

[zbdent]

5. MIH? not likely. LIH, definitely

When you always have the feeling that you're being watched, you tend to behave; kinda like seeing a police car in the middle of the highway and dropping your speed from 70 to the speed limit.

When the 9/11 terrorists were running around the US in 2001, and the Repukes pulled agents from their tails to investigate Chandra Levy, missing "W" keys, "porn bombs", New York offices, and Presidential pardons, then these guys realized that nobody was tailing them . . .

[Greyhound]

6. I rejected MIHOP too, until I saw the "Loose Change" video.

Now I'm really questioning it. I found barely plausible explanations for most of it, but the aircraft parts they presented as evidence that weren't part of the plane that (757, 737?) was supposed to have crashed into the Pentagon has no other answer that I can see (they were parts from an obsolete military craft, just the kind of thing that would be converted into a drone). :tinfoilhat: