Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LTTE in the Cincinnati Enquirer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 07:54 PM
Original message
LTTE in the Cincinnati Enquirer
Note to the mods: As this is a LTTE, I assume that copyright doesn't apply:

Gay isn't normal, no matter who says
Dr. Daniel W. Nebert
I agree with Peter Bronson's assessment of "The slippery slopes of Brokeback Mountain" (Feb. 26), echoed by Charles Krauthammer's thoughts regarding another movie ("'Syriana' reeks with betrayal," March 3). This is simply more of Hollywood's agenda to push the secular-progressive movement: "Let's give that movie Oscar nominations in many categories, just to make a political point."

Genetically and evolutionarily speaking, homosexuality is not normal - no matter how Hollywood and other secular progressives wish to spin it. "Normality" (in genetic or evolutionary terms) is defined as reproductive success that leads to future healthy generations of the species. Sexual orientation, as well as courtship behavior, is regulated in the fruit fly by Fruitless, a gene that functions specifically in the brain. Fruitless mutants show aberrant mating behavior. Many fru mutations result in male flies that court indiscriminately. When fru mutant males are grouped together, they form male-male courtship "chains" in which each male is simultaneously both courting and being courted; all mutant combinations show some male-male "chaining."

Specific chromosomal regions have been associated with the human "gay" phenotype, but no gene has been identified with certainty.

As with any other biological defect, the risk of homosexuality reflects the combination of multiple mutated genes plus environmental factors. In the case of human homosexuality, "the environment" is likely to be an imbalance of sex steroid levels at some critical point during pregnancy, affecting the fetal brain, most likely in the third trimester.

Studies have now shown that differences in diet and stress in the pregnant mother can affect the fetus in the uterus - which can lead to increased blood pressure, risk of heart trouble and/or kidney disease in that baby 40 or 60 years later. In fact, even if a grandmother had smoked cigarettes, her daughter's daughter can show substantially greater risk of asthma and other lung diseases.

Subtle environmental effects on our genes continue to be discovered, as more and more exciting medical research is being carried out.

Dr. Daniel W. Nebert is a professor in the Department of Environmental Health, Center for Environmental Genetics and Department of Pediatrics & Molecular Developmental Biology at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center.


This is why I am glad that I no longer live in Cincinnati. A bigger bunch of backwoods country fucks I've never seen in my life.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wait. I thought being gay was a choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No...
Apparently it's a fucking birth defect...

Might I suggest that we all visit this site:

http://www.uc.edu/president/feedback.html

and leave some feedback for the President of the University of Cincinnati?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagine My Surprise Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. As a gay man 90 miles away in Louisville, just curious where you moved to
from Cincinnati. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. My handle is "Jeff in Milwaukee"
So there you have it. I live in Pittsburgh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. The stupidity that is reflected in this letter is beyond comment.
I question what kind of a "doctor" this guy is, bring that obvious science of homosexuality is clearly not comprehended by this idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He's got a background in genetics...
I used to work at the UC Medical Center.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Does he understand genetics... or is he a "Christian scientist"...
... putting the actual genetics behind his fundamentalist agenda.

I wonder if he also thinks feminism is a birth defect. What about Islam? Are those people suffering from a birth defect?

What else has this monster done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Hard to tell...
He deals with genetic responses to environmental factors. Stuff like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. borned and raised up thar till i was 28.
and i don't miss it. ever.

statistically speaking, if homosexuality is say, 10% of the population, then yes, that is 'not normal', if normality is defined as the majority condition.

but so fucking what? is this dickhead proposing pre-natal monitoring to prevent homosexuality?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bunch o' jerks.
I feel for the few liberals who live there.

I read recently, that Cincy was the only major city that FDR never carried . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You heard correctly...
During the darkest days of World War II, Cincinnati assholes wanted to changge Presidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC