Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Democrats will push for Congressional oversight

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 03:40 PM
Original message
The Democrats will push for Congressional oversight
and investigations in the activities of the Bush administration.

UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM — MINORITY STAFF
SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS DIVISION
JANUARY 17, 2006

CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT OF THE
BUSH ADMINISTRATION

PREPARED FOR
REP. HENRY A. WAXMAN



TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................1
I. MANIPULATION OF IRAQ INTELLIGENCE...............................................................................2
II. TREATMENT OF DETAINEES.............................................................................................5
III. LEAK OF A COVERT CIA AGENT’S STATUS........................................................................7
IV. AWARD OF HALLIBURTON CONTRACTS ...........................................................................9
V. WHITE HOUSE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE KATRINA RESPONSE ..............................................10
VI. SECRET NSA WIRETAPS .....................................................................................11
VII. VICE PRESIDENT’S ENERGY TASK FORCE...................................................................12
VIII. WITHHOLDING OF MEDICARE COST ESTIMATES ..........................................................13
IX. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AT MULTIPLE FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE WHITE HOUSE.................14
X. POLITICIZATION OF THE FEDERAL SCIENCE-BASED AGENCIES ..........................................15
XI. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ENFORCEMENT OF VOTING RIGHTS LAWS ........................................16
XII. CONTRACT ABUSES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ................................17
XIII. INFLUENCE OF LOBBYISTS AT EPA ....................................................................18
XIV. INFLUENCE OF TOBACCO INDUSTRY LOBBYISTS ON U.S. TOBACCO POLICIES .....................19
XV. FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN ASHCROFT’S CAMPAIGN FUNDRAISING ACTIVITIES.............19

Snip (pg. 1)
This report identifies 15 key oversight issues involving President Bush and his Administration that Congress has failed to investigate. They are:

• The role of the White House in manipulating intelligence about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction and ties to al Qaeda;
• The responsibility of senior Administration officials for the abuse of detainees;
• The role of White House officials in leaking the identity of a covert CIA agent;
• The role of the Vice President’s office in the award of Halliburton contracts;
• The responsibility of senior White House officials in the failed response to Hurricane Katrina;
• The secret wiretapping of U.S. citizens by the National Security Agency;
• The identity of the energy industry contributors who met with the Vice President’s energy task force;
• The role of the White House in withholding key Medicare cost estimates from Congress;
• Evidence of conflicts of interest at multiple federal agencies and the White House;
• The increasing politicization of science-based federal agencies;
• The failure of the Department of Justice to enforce voting rights laws;
• Contract abuses at the Department of Homeland Security;
• The influence of industry lobbyists in writing EPA regulations;
• The influence of the tobacco industry lobbyists on U.S. tobacco policies; and
• The role of former Attorney General John Ashcroft in illegal campaign finance activities.

The report examines the response of the Republican-controlled Congress to these 15 oversight issues. In each case, a large “accountability gap” has emerged. Despite repeated requests by Democratic members and news reports raising allegations of serious misconduct, the Congress has failed to convene hearings, issue subpoenas, and take the other steps necessary to fulfill its constitutional oversight role.


Snip (pg. 4)...

On multiple occasions, Republican Committee chairmen in the House have denied requests from ranking Democratic members to hold hearings into the manipulation of Iraq intelligence. On July 15, 2003, Rep. Waxman asked Rep. Porter Goss, the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, to hold hearings in the use of the forged nuclear evidence.9 On October 4, 2004, Rep. Waxman asked Rep. Tom Davis, the Chairman of the House Government Reform Committee, to hold hearings on new revelations casting doubt on the “nuclear tubes” evidence cited by multiple Administration officials.10 On June 30, 2005, Rep. John Conyers and over 50 other Democratic members of Congress asked Rep. James Sensenbrenner, the Chairman of House Judiciary Committee, to hold hearings into the “Downing Street Memo,” a British document suggesting the United States and the United Kingdom may have manipulated intelligence about Iraq.11 And on November 4, 2005, Rep. Jane Harman asked Rep. Peter Hoekstra, the new Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, to examine “how intelligence products and presentations were developed, whether dissents were properly reflected, and what steps, if any, were taken by the IC to correct misstatements of intelligence by senior Administration
officials.”12 All of these requests were ignored or rejected.

On the Senate side, after pressure from Democrats, the chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence said in February 2004 that the Committee would look at this issue.13 But he subsequently stated the matter is “basically on the back burner.”14 Following the disclosure of the Downing Street Memo, Senator John Kerry and other Democratic Senators again urged Senate intelligence committee hearings on Iraq intelligence, but the Chairman declined this request.15


http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/Documents/20060117103554-62297.pdf



http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/515
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Baloney!
I'm tired of reading this type of stuff because nothing ever happens. Any of us could make up the list of failings, incompetance, manipulation, breaking the law, etc. but they never go anywhere. A list like this says the "I" word to me---am I nuts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. start pushing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. nominate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
4.  “basically on the back burner.”
Yeah, until November.:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. nothing is going to happen in november... except rigged elections
Edited on Mon Mar-20-06 05:16 PM by radio4progressives
new congress critters won't be "in office" until January, and "working" in February..

We'll just have to see if Diebold is going to let any Dems win...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bush's crimes warrant impeachment. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. totally agree..
too bad the Dems don't see that way..

70% of the Democratic voting base wants impeachment. One would think that the party leadership would respond to this, with something other than:

"No Impeachment. Elections have Consequences, if You don't like who is in office, then you have to vote them out"


Congress member, Nancy Pelosi, Democratic Minority Whip .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Damn! That's quite a pile of felonies!
It just takes one that sticks to move for impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. Democrats Say Bush Violated Constitution (on budget)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC