Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Calls for censure should be framed to focus on the Republican vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:38 PM
Original message
Calls for censure should be framed to focus on the Republican vote
Edited on Sun Mar-19-06 12:41 PM by ProSense
Maybe it's time to focus on why the Republicans are not voting for censure. That is the missed opportunity.

Digby: The Dems are missing the boat on Feingold

Snip...

None of these reasons hold up for me. They do not denote timidity, so much as a kind of political blindness. Let's take them one by one...


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/digby/the-dems-are-missing-the-_b_17475.html




Finally, after five days of branding all Demmocrats, including some of the party's strongest and most progressive leaders, as cowards with disinformation about the Clinton impeachment, the cry is now political blindness. There are clearly Democrats who need to wake up, but this campaign to tarnish Democratic leaders was wrong.


One: The port legislation was reported on CNN. And it was reported with as much fanfare as it ever would have been. But it is as dry as tinder. The mojo of that controversy is past. It did its job...


Yes, it and a number of other things are contributing to Bush and the Repubs downfall. That will not end anytime soon.


Two: Please tell me that the Democrats are not going to withhold criticim of Bush because it might make Republicans rally around him...


Which Democrat said that? And how will putting the Republicans on record for voting against censure going to have an impact if the investigations don’t go forward.


Three: It's apparently true that Feingold didn't consult with the party...


This is responsible for the confusion, along with statements framing censure as an alternative to impeachment, which would be bad for the country during a time of war.


Four: Iraq is the issue that's killing the Republicans in the polls...


Sign the DSM letter and support the Leahy/Kennedy resolution and calls for investigations.


Five: Well yes, by all means a strategy whereby we count on Arlen Specter to hold "real" hearings is spot on. What could possibly go wrong? Why, if we wait until after the 2008 election, he might even do it.


Does this mean the Democrats will lose in 2006 and will not regain control of Congress?

Desperation is no reason to treat censure as the most damaging thing we could do to Bush, while missing the opportunity to focus on the Republicans dereliction of duty.

It’s good to put the Republicans on record if we vigorously pursue investigations. You can't call for unity while berating the party's strongest and most progressive leaders. And, 2006 is the issue, not 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Durbin: Republicans have abdicated their responsibilities
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC