On DU, there are plenty of threads about the press conference

[Roon]

but go to freeperville and you can't find any threads about the press conference at all!! Gee, I wonder why? I thought Bush did a GREAT job?!?

[BobcatJH]

1. It's hard to write about the press conference ...

... when there are all of those crosses to burn, hospices to blockade and abortion clinics to protest.

[AussieDave]

2. Here ya go:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1600867/posts

Not many replies, but how can one make a silk purse out of a sack of shit ???

On edit:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1600229/posts?q=1&&page=901

This second one was started before the press conference began, but ran through and after it.


Excuse me - I hafta go boil myself now..........

[Roon]

3. Cool!!

Thanks!

[C_U_L8R]

4. You can tell when things hit a nerve over there

the freepers scurry like
cockroaches into the silence
and cower in shame.

[Roon]

6. I know

If Bush did such a great job, you would see threads saying so, but they are avoiding the topic like the plague! It's really funny to watch!

[NanceGreggs]

5. It's plain to see ...

... that the 'blame the Media' talking point has taken hold with Freepers, and big time!

That's to be expected, though. When you're dealing with minds that are totally empty, inserting the talking point du jour is an effortless exercise.

[C_U_L8R]

7. blah blah blah

that old tired "blame the media" chestnut ain't gonna work

there's no truth behind it... if anything the media's been leaning way right

[NanceGreggs]

8. We KNOW the truth ...

... but over in Freeperville, the truth is still missing in action.

[cboy4]

9. They're too busy going online, ordering illegal prescription

drugs for their hero Rush. :puke:

[Contrary1]

10. Here's one...

Guess they weren't watching the same press conference as the rest of us. But then, anyone who still supports the clown-in-chief isn't interested in reality.

"PRESIDENT BUSH should hold more news conferences. In his hour-long exchange with reporters at the White House yesterday, he was considerably more effective in explaining and defending his commitment to the war in Iraq than in the three carefully worded speeches he has delivered in the past week. In his sometimes blunt, sometimes joking and sometimes unpolished way, he sounded authentic -- no more so than when he was asked what had become of the "political capital" he claimed after the 2004 election. "I'd say I'm spending that capital on the war," Mr. Bush replied. And so he is."

*Excerpt from the Washington Post - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/21/AR2006032101679.html

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1600843/posts