Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld
declined yesterday to predict when U.S. forces would be out of Iraq.
"I've avoided predicting the timing," Rumsfeld told reporters at the Pentagon.
Well, not exactly. In fact, Rumsfeld has made several predictions about how long troops would be needed in Iraq.
Rumsfeld may have tried to spin reporters yesterday, but history tells a different story. You'd think the Bush Administration would learn after five-plus years in office that their public statements are recorded, and can easily be used for comparison and contrast. Guess not.
Before the war began, for example, Rumsfeld made two rather rosy predications about how long troops would be needed in Iraq. In November, 2002, he
said: "The Gulf War in the 1990s lasted five days on the ground.
I can’t tell you if the use of force in Iraq today would last five days, or five weeks, or five months, but it certainly isn’t going to last any longer than that."
Three months later, Rumsfeld
offered a similar statement: "
It is unknowable how long that conflict will last. It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months."
With President Bush now saying a future U.S. president and a future Iraqi government would decide when U.S. troops would leave,
six days, six weeks and six months have been replaced with six years as a rosy prediction. ***
This item first appeared at
JABBS.