Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Personal Bankruptcy Filings Up 30 Pct.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 06:21 PM
Original message
Personal Bankruptcy Filings Up 30 Pct.

Personal Bankruptcy Filings Up 30 Pct.

35 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - Personal bankruptcies soared 30 percent to a record high last year as financially strained people rushed to file before new restrictions took effect Oct. 17.

Bankruptcy petitions filed in federal courts totaled 2,039,214 in 2005, up from 1,563,145 in 2004, according to data released Friday by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

A new law, which brought the most comprehensive revision of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in a quarter-century, made it more difficult to erase credit card and other debts in bankruptcy. Prior to its enactment, the number of bankruptcy filings had been fairly stable.

The law bars those with above-average income from Chapter 7 — where debts can be wiped out entirely — except under special circumstances. Those deemed by a new "means test" to have at least $100 a month left over after paying certain debts and expenses must file instead a 5-year repayment plan under the more restrictive Chapter 13.

more...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060324/ap_on_bi_ge/bankruptcy_surge_yourmoney_3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is another crime-- K N R
Get you fill here:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. snigger...
sure, that must be it. It probably has nothing at all to do with unemployment, underemployment, looted pensions, and soaring drug costs. It's the lawyers' fault!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. You can both be right.
I guess we'll know for sure when we get the 2006 filings. Besides, there are plenty of other indicators of poverty that reflect everything crappy thing that's going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Money
Its all about making more money off others. Heard the same thing about those attorney fees. Also, don't people now have to pay for other services up to 6 months or more in order to learn how now to let this happen again? The services are mandatory and not free, or so I recall reading in the paper last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Oct.-Dec., the number doubled compared to same period previous year:
In the final quarter of the year, which included the two weeks preceding the Oct. 17 deadline, filings under Chapter 7 ballooned to 560,654 from 254,518 in the October-December period of 2004. Chapter 13 filings fell to 93,714 from 109,116.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's a lot!
That works out to about one percent of working adults if you think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. A new mini-Depression on the horizon? Take some courses in French
The US now has the lowest savings rate in our history since the 1920's. Plus, both our personal and government debt are going through the roof. In other words, in a few years, all the nastiness is gonna hit the fan-- this is basic economics at work here.

It's funny cuz I was talking to an old friend of mine who's now working as an economist, about the best way to prepare for the economic perils within the next few years. His response to me: "Take some courses or buy some tapes and CD's to learn French or German or another big EU language. Find a friend who's worked in Europe and try to get some connections with a company there. Then move there as fast as you can, early, before everything comes tumbling down on this side of the Atlantic." This really scared the crap out of me, because this guy was one of the most sunnily cheery, patriotic types back in college, a sort of gregarious fraternity type, I never thought he'd talk like that. But he said he's already started using the Pimsleur series to get fluent in French (which he never took in high school), since his company has some connections with partners in Marseilles and he could easily get a job there once his French gets better. He's actually been a mostly Republican voter, but says he's so furious at Bush that he considers him quite possibly the worst President in US history, who's damaged the US more than any other leader.

He said that all the English-speaking countries in general are headed downward because this stupid Iraq War has ensnared almost all of them (and Canada's so closely wound up in the US economy that it would collapse as well once the US goes down). The debt levels from the war are unsustainable and the US, Britain, Australia and other allies are about to be dragged even further into the mire with other Middle Eastern conflicts and, importantly, the posting of our bases throughout the Middle East which inflames the natives. We've all now become perceived by the Muslim world as enemies-- that's 1.5 billion people, and it'll take decades to undo the damage. It's a long war that we can't win and that bankrupts us more every day.

I asked him about whether Europe's economy would suffer with ours, and he said that it would feel a pinch, but that the EU is much less reliant on us, with a steadier internal economy and far higher savings rates, plus increasing business with China, India, Russia, the Middle East and South America. Even with its current problems, the EU has a much more rock-solid foundation than the US. (In fact, he said Europe's current problems are in part because the people there are much more realistic about dealing with debt and unsustainable defense budgets, among other things.)

So that's the lesson for today folks-- get some course materials from Pimsleur, Berlitz, Instant Immersion or one of the other language companies, and start learning some French or Spanish or German. Or maybe even Chinese or Japanese or Hindi if you're so inclined. Because here, things are about to head south fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Frankly, I'd be happier here if we had less money and
spread it around more fairly. And, once the Bush gang has just spent it all and can't get more to buy their stupid weapons, we can start focusing on making good communities for Americans as opposed to bossing the people in other countries around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. It's much worse that most realize. "Our" government has been lying
to us for over 40 years about the real numbers. Check out this article.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=114x19805

13% unemployment, 8% inflation, and the real shocker, $3.5 trillion annual deficit! It is going to crash and crash hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. *very* interesting.
There's no way the U.S. economy in its current form is sustainable; we're becoming a 3rd world nation. I'd love to move to a European country so I could work for a living & have universal healthcare.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. Local Real Estate Agents Say...
With each passing week, more and more people are foreclosing to the likes they've not seen since Reagan/Bush1 years. And there are plenty of buyers just waiting in the background, salivating at others losses for investment purposes.

Have you any idea how many middle-americans, at least in my neck of the woods, are clueless to last years bankruptcy bill? Literally each one I gab with passing-by while shopping look at me blankly and ask what I'm talking about, while they charge up a storm living on credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. Thank you DLC - thanks for your support of corporations
every DLC member except Hillary voted for the new bankruptcy bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. And she did vote for it twice before, but weaseled out of voting
Edited on Sat Mar-25-06 01:14 PM by greyhound1966
on the one that passed. (Before the Defenders of Hillary Inc. jump in, it was just a check-up.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. No argument about Hillary sitting it out
But I will say that Feinstein, Leiberman, Kerry, a few other DLCers voted against it.

S. 256 nays
________________
Akaka (D-HI)
Boxer (D-CA)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Corzine (D-NJ)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Harkin (D-IA)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Obama (D-IL)
Reed (D-RI)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Wyden (D-OR)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Totally false. For your info, here is the Senate rollcal
Edited on Sat Mar-25-06 02:31 PM by Mass
Lieberman voted against it. Clinton was not even there.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00044

Byrd and Reid voted for it, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC