Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Roberts Appoints Conservative Ex-Starr Deputy to FISA Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 06:55 AM
Original message
Roberts Appoints Conservative Ex-Starr Deputy to FISA Court
According to a new report by the Federation of American Scientists, Chief Justice John Roberts has appointed Judge John Bates to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. Bates is replacing Judge James Robertson, who resigned last December to protest President Bush’s illegal domestic wiretapping program.

Bates has a “distinctly conservative cast to his resume.” From 1995 to 1997, he served as Ken Starr’s deputy in the Whitewater investigation, a glorified political witch-hunt that never managed to turn up evidence of wrongdoing by the Clintons.

In 2001, Bates was appointed to district court by President Bush, where he was assigned the lawsuit seeking details about Vice President Cheney’s secret energy taskforce. In a widely criticized ruling, Bates dismissed the case:

The third Starr retread currently wielding a gavel, District Judge John Bates, played a major role in stymieing a more substantive investigation than the one he pursued under Starr. The General Accounting Office (GAO) brought the first lawsuit in its 80-plus-year existence after Dick Cheney stonewalled its attempt to obtain information about the veep’s 2001 energy task force. Bates, who provided the rationale for subpoenaing any woman to whom Clinton may have talked dirty about Whitewater, dismissed the GAO’s effort to learn with whom Cheney’s task force conferred.

Now, on the FISA court, one can only hope Bates will care as much about the privacy of ordinary Americans as he did for Dick Cheney, Ken Lay, and Big Oil executives.

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/03/24/roberts-appoints-conservative-ex-starr-deputy-to-fisa-court/trackback/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Consider the odds
These people are first and foremost political partisan hacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. fukkin country that can't won't defend itself....
sheese the american mafia take care of it's ratfinks and doublecrossers better then the usa.....why doesn't anyone fight for the usa?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. How much more of a rubber stamp could the FISA court be?
They turned down a handful out fo thousands of wiretap requests. The problem is Bush doesn't even consult them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. I said this a few months ago and will say it once more
Now that Bush has gone down in polls we will see more and more of this. The right wing will try to change any thing it can to their way of thinking in case they do not stay in power and that they are also sort of drunk in the power they have now. It will also be the same with the crooks coming out of the wood work to get all they can. Look at the selling off of the national parks that is coming up. They have put their people in all the gov. dept and they will be hard at it to do what they can before Nov. I get the funny feeling that the Dem. in Congress are letting them do it as to show what they are. I would like to see them screaming my self.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopein08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-25-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not that it would do anything, but does he face confirmation?
Or does Roberts get to appoint whomever he wants?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC