Katherine Harris campaign pic

[TomInTib]

Does this woman know how to dress appropriately or what?

[DainBramaged]

1. Is that a whore in the picture, or just an impersonator

http://katherineharrissucks.com/

I forgot to add that weblink.

[Sugarcoated]

17. I can't get that website link to load

it keeps timing out.

[DainBramaged]

19. Loads in about a second here (cable)

[roseBudd]

2. surely that is PhotoShopped n/t

[Sal Minella]

6. Please, please tell us it's photoshopped........

[Wrinkle_In_Time]

28. Yes, and badly done, too...

1) lighting on the torso is completely different.
2) fingers of left hand are sliced off.
3) top of lecturn disappears.
4) stop-sign size and perspective are all wrong.
5) I think her new fake breasts are bigger than that. :puke:

[bertha katzenengel]

3. "sex trafficking?"

what is that? :naive:

If she is referring to the prostitution trade, excuse me for the pun, but fuck 'er. It ought to be legal.

What an ass.

[graywarrior]

4. Ha ha ha. She wishes.

[Dr.Phool]

5. Hey, she paid a lot of money for those new boobs

She's gotta show'em whenever she gets a chance.

Gotta be photoshopped. All those noses should be blue.

[spindrifter]

7. Photo shop?

[NMDemDist2]

8. sexist much?

there's plenty to throw at her with out this sexist crap

:banghead:

[DainBramaged]

9. But it speaks volumes about her. She is a whore, thrown to the curb

by the Bushies, just like Linda Tripp.

[NMDemDist2]

10. she can't be the whore

she's the one paying for it.

and it's still sexist.

[Katherine Brengle]

31. Nice attempt to turn around what you meant by "whore" but...

that's bs.

This entire thread is sexist, regardless of whether or not Katherine Harris is a good person.

Her political ideas and actions are not being discussed here--her body and possible actions are being used to malign her entire person, and if she were a man, this would not be happening.

I thought DUers were a little smarter than this, but I am starting to think maybe not...

[TomInTib]

12. Sexist? She's the one in the spandex tee horseback pic. n/t

[NMDemDist2]

13. and I wouldn't have said a thing if that was the pic in the OP

but it's not.

[Katherine Brengle]

32. Why not? Last time I checked, what I wear does not...

determine whether or not I have sex with people for money.

[JeffR]

16. Exactly

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2535387

[Name removed]

14. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[left is right]

11. a string of pearls in the daytime?

Anyone with any class knows that pearls are strictly eveningware

[RebelOne]

30. Wrong. Pearls are appropriate any time.

[ladjf]

15. Gotta be a photo shop job.

[Roland99]

18. Remember these? Katherine Harris Shakes her Booty

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/08/09.html


Katherine Harris cuddling on the House floor

[TomInTib]

20. I had forgotten about that. Good one..

How can one be sexist about someone who runs her life like a soft porn show?

[Zynx]

26. She only reinforces negative stereotypes about women with her actions.

She deserves to be called every name in the book.

[DainBramaged]

21. Larry Sabato, the director of politics at the University of Virginia

"I'm not sure $100 million could elect Katherine Harris. You can spend $100 million marketing dog food, but if the dogs won't eat, it isn't going to sell.

[Name removed]

22. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[NMDemDist2]

23. hmmm

welcome to DU :hi:

that's pretty harsh though, I must say.

[collegegirl211]

25. I know but look what they say about our women

they call Hillary every name in the book and her daughter and they comment on Nancy Pelosi looks etc, we need to fight fire with fire:evilgrin:

[noamnety]

29. The problem with that statement

is that your flamethrower isn't any more of a smart munition than what we're dropping in Iraq. Part of it lands on Harris, I suppose, if she happens to read DU, which I doubt. The bulk of your flames land on every DU woman who might be considering a run for office, just as it does when people laugh at a political figure's wife for having a large ass, or for not looking like a model in general.

Why beat up on the self-esteem of anyone here that has integrity and wisdom, but also has big breasts or a large backside or too many curves or not enough curves? Why make that part of the war?

If the right mocks a democratic woman's looks, why is it an appropriate response to call one of their women a skank, or a whore, or a bitch, or even talk about her chest? All you're doing is reinforcing the idea that ANY woman who runs for office should expect her opponents to demean her based on her sex and physical appearance.

Seriously, you all need to step back and think about what you're trying to accomplish, and then consider what the actual affects of your war are likely to be.

[lukasahero]

33. Thank you for an excellent, excellent post. eom

[Warren DeMontague]

24. Oh, the irony.

That's really weird.

[otohara]

27. Now That's Just Bad

photo shopping...