Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lerk's Law of Relative Extremism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 11:55 AM
Original message
Lerk's Law of Relative Extremism
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 11:56 AM by Lerkfish
Lerk's Law of Relative Extremism

The further one travels to any political extreme, the more every other point appears to move in the opposite direction, even if it doesn't move or is completely balanced

Expanding the law: Only those points of view adjacent to you seem fair and balanced, ONLY because they are equally as skewed as your own viewpoint.
For example: if you have a balanced view on rights for widgets, then pro-widget right advocates would view you as anti-widget, and anti-widget advocates would view you as pro-widget rights. AND, to you, both view would seem extreme, but to themselves they each consider their view balanced.

If you are pretty much to the end of an extreme, then NOTHING is balanced except that which matches your own level. The closer you are to the moderate or balanced position, the easier it is for more moderate views of either end of the spectrum to seem reasonable to you, even if you disagree.

so, the term "bias" does not reflect the actual bias of the report, but the bias of the observer. Hence, the extreme right wing claim of "liberal media". Since to the extreme right wing, EVERYTHING else is liberal.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. so...give us the Lerk's Law of Choice...
what's a "balanced" view of women's right to choose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'd be the wrong person to ask: I'm extreme on that issue.
I absolutely support the woman's right to choose. Everything else to me seems the wrong idea.

The point of Lerk's Law is just explaining how moving to any extreme colors your perception of an issue.
It may not work for every issue, but it usually works concernging perception of bias on an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. ok...i'm extreme too...
i guess i took your post as a screed against an extreme view on abortion...i mean widget...rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. nope, its supposed to be general and applicable to any issue.
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 12:20 PM by Lerkfish
any divisive issue, I suppose.

I'm not saying a "balanced" view is correct. In fact, on many issues, there is no balance. Torture, for one. I'm only saying that your own position on the spectrum colors how you view the relative positions of others.

Personally, I'm an extremist more than a balanced person on most issues. I'm a pacifist, so I tend to be suspicious of ANY justifications of war, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stanchetalarooni Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe things would go a lot smoother if instead of human brains........
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 12:20 PM by Stanchetalarooni
....we were endowed with gerbil brains. Gerbils are so cuddly and curious and they look like they are having a ball playing when they are not sleeping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC