|
Edited on Sun Mar-26-06 11:56 AM by Lerkfish
Lerk's Law of Relative Extremism
The further one travels to any political extreme, the more every other point appears to move in the opposite direction, even if it doesn't move or is completely balanced
Expanding the law: Only those points of view adjacent to you seem fair and balanced, ONLY because they are equally as skewed as your own viewpoint. For example: if you have a balanced view on rights for widgets, then pro-widget right advocates would view you as anti-widget, and anti-widget advocates would view you as pro-widget rights. AND, to you, both view would seem extreme, but to themselves they each consider their view balanced.
If you are pretty much to the end of an extreme, then NOTHING is balanced except that which matches your own level. The closer you are to the moderate or balanced position, the easier it is for more moderate views of either end of the spectrum to seem reasonable to you, even if you disagree.
so, the term "bias" does not reflect the actual bias of the report, but the bias of the observer. Hence, the extreme right wing claim of "liberal media". Since to the extreme right wing, EVERYTHING else is liberal.
|