I was thinking, when I heard, on NPR, that many in LA schools were marching today, too, against the new immigration bill.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-032706walkout_lat,0,5206101.story?coll=la-home-headlines My generations, we used to see students marching against the war in Vietnam, and for civil rights.
But, of course, I knew the answer. And I have been saying this over and over on these pages:
People vote for what touches them personally, directly, viscerally.
As much as many now agree that the war was a bad move, that it is not going well - it a distance topic to most voters. First, the soldiers are volunteer, as opposed to the draft of the 60s. Second, even at more than 2000 dead and many more wounded, for a nation of 300 million, most do not know personally a person who died, or who was wounded, or a family in mourning. Even during Vietnam, the marches and the protest started when all college deferments were canceled, when being drafted become very near and immediate to many middle class college kids.
This is how Karl Rove got the troops to the poll in 2000 and 2004 and even in 2002: he made the "baby killing" and the "perverts" a personal issue for his base. He made it so that people could viscerally become very much involved in these issues - and this is what we need.
So when I see thread after thread of people debating who should be the 2008 candidate I keep replying: no one, not now.
But, really, at this point it is the message, not the messenger that we should worry about. We need to get the message of schools, job security, access to health care and retirement to be close and personal. We cannot talk about universal health care, for example, if we cannot talk to Joe whose brother, a successful contractor, had a heart attack and now no one would insure him. Or to Mary whose mother has cancer but is too young for medicare and until she reaches 65 cannot get insurance.
Forget about impeachment, forget about censure, forget about wiretapping, forget about Roe (I am going to be hit by lightning now, I am sure..)
We know that our issues are the ones that matter to most voters - when we get to talk to them in church, or in the small diner, or in the store or in the clinic.
Forget about high ideas and big words. We need to go down to the trenches and find the point where voting for a Democrat instead of a Republican will matter, personally, viscerally, to the voter down south or southwest who gets to hear about politics and the news only on Sunday from the minister.
If there is one thing we can take home from the immigration protest - this should be it. People, voters, care about politics when it touches them up close and personal, emotionally and viscerally.