Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WaPo: Retired Generals Want Scalia Off Gitmo Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 11:42 PM
Original message
WaPo: Retired Generals Want Scalia Off Gitmo Case
WP
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/27/AR2006032701399.html?nav=hcmodule

Retired Generals Want Scalia Off Gitmo Case

The Associated Press
Monday, March 27, 2006; 11:20 PM


WASHINGTON -- Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was asked Monday to stay out of a case involving a foreign detainee because of remarks Scalia made about the rights of enemy combatants.

Speaking at the University of Freiberg in Switzerland on March 8, Scalia said foreigners waging war against the United States have no rights under the Constitution.

Justices were hearing arguments Tuesday in the case of Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a former driver for Osama bin Laden. His lawyers argue that President Bush overstepped his authority when he ordered Hamdan and other alleged enemy combatants to face special military trials.

Hamdan's lawyers have not called for Scalia to step aside. Instead, five retired generals who support Hamdan's arguments sent a letter late Monday to the court with the request that Scalia withdraw from participating in the case. They say Scalia appears to have prejudged the case.

<<snip>>

The letter came from five retired generals and admirals: Navy Rear Adm. Donald J. Guter; Navy Rear Adm. John D. Hutson; Vice Adm. Lee F. Gunn; Marine Brig. Gen. David M. Brahms; and Army Brig. Gen. James P. Cullen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wonder if he'll flip them the bird, as well.
:grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, this is sweet.
Stress the fat slug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. ain't it though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. KICK, KICK, KICK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebellious Republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Retired Generals? Go Navy, I think thats more like retired Admirals...
I see three Swabbies
(Swabbies, A US Navy sailor. A reference to "swabbing the deck", a frequent and highly visible activity of deck division sailors.)


One Bullet sponge and he could be considered more like an admiral than a than a general, he worked for the Department of the Navy, all though most Marines hate to admit that!
(Bullet sponge, An infantryman, most commonly the point man of an infantry fire team who is usually the first member of the team to engage, or be engaged by, the enemy. Also, regular Army reference to the USMC)


One Grunt (Grunt,A US soldier - sometimes, but not always, specifically refers to an infantryman.)

And with that, Alpha Mike Foxtrot, I am outa here.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC