Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interetsing analysis on state poltical trends

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 07:56 PM
Original message
Interetsing analysis on state poltical trends
Red states trending dem: Colorado, Florida, Nevada, Ohio, Virginia
Blue states trending red: Hawaii

Interesting comment:
"The states moving leftwards, while the same in number same as the number moving rightward, possess 72.5% more electoral votes."

http://electionpredictions.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't agree with his assessment of New Mexico
Wilson won the last two races by the skin on her fangs and only due to corrupted elections. This time she's running against an extremely popular figure and the voting system is now 100% optical scan paper ballots. In other words, even if the scanners are hacked, Madrid will be in a great position to insist on a hand recount, which I'm sure she will.

I think Heartless Heather is gonna be out on her bony ass. She isn't popular. She forgets all about this state as soon as she hits DC, where she's trying to be a Repug rising star.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. and I'm moving in to add a another (2) vote(s) to the Dems in NM
:woohoo:

I'm counting hubby's vote too :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Well, Steve Pearce (R-doofus) is unopposed at this point
and you'll be living in the reddest part of the state, so good luck. Pearce is a total know nothing who gets elected only because of that (R) after his name and the fact that he votes the straight neocon, fundy way.

He had good opposition in 2004 and it wasn't even close.

The same goes for the Senator, Domenici (R-wingnut), a place holder who forgot why he was sent there in the first place and spends most of his time raising funds and lobbying to keep redundant air bases open in this state. The oil boys pretty much own him, I think.

Both of them have reliably neocon/theocrat voting records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
espera17 Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Time
it will be years before Arizona is truly competitive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
espera17 Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. recommendation
i recommend you leave a comment, he is good about responding to them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's only basing it on five elections,
two of which where three-way races where Ross Perot really cut into the Republican base. I think a qualitative analysis will be more accurate than a simple by-the-numbers analysis.

Also, aren't Iowa and Wisconsin and Minnesota becoming redder? It seems to me that they used to be comfortably Democratic and are now only barely Democratic or not at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
espera17 Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Perot not a factor
Because he zeroes the state margin according to the national one, there is no Perot effect. Iowa is listed as trending Republican, while Wisconsin and Minnesota are listed as steady. Remember, they could be trending Republican but under the 1% rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. <double post>
Edited on Tue Mar-28-06 08:13 PM by leyton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
espera17 Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Iowa as well
While Iowa went for Bush in 2004, it is still considered blue but it is moving rightward as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WestSeattle2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hawaii trending red?!
Pearl Harbor will freeze over before that happens. Many native Hawaiians are socially conservative, but when push comes to shove, they vote D. They support conservative social initiatives, but not very many conservative politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
espera17 Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Since 1988
Since 1988, the Democratic margin of victory in Hawaii has been declining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. I don't buy it
Edited on Wed Mar-29-06 12:53 PM by Lexingtonian
There are problems with working purely by percentages. Republicans got a soft 10% increase in turnout of conservative leaners in '04. Those people don't show up for midterms and they are Undecideds soon to be Disapproval for Bush at the moment. And Bush = Republicans these days.

I will agree with this person's list of D-trending states. But the trend in all the 48 continental states is all Democratic- he's wrong to see true Republican trend anywhere except Hawai'i. And those states he claims are treading water...that's the surface, that's not the way the results in November are going to look.

Hawai'i has simply been run by an older, conservative version of Democrats for so long that change is necessary. What seems to me to be going on in the state is what happened on the mainland in the late Eighties and early Nineties- a reluctant retention of conservative Democrats to protect the blue collar labor force but reactionary trend to social change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
espera17 Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Not so fast
States like Nebraska have been moving rightward, as have Utah, Idaho, Georgia, etc. You can't possibly be arguing that Mississippi is becoming more Democratic are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC