Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Important Questions about Brian Doyle are about the DHS Itself....imho

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:19 PM
Original message
The Important Questions about Brian Doyle are about the DHS Itself....imho
First Question:
Is this not a position requiring a high security clearance? Usually, those investigators mean business and they find out ANYthing and everything. Now, I know it's said that pedophiles cover their tracks -- but are we supposed to believe that he was THAT good at secrecy, and was caught giving out all this info about himself? Or are we supposed to believe this was the ONLY time he ever tried such a thing, and was simply caught the first time?

Second Question:
Is it possible they didn't DO security clearances when they set up DHS? Was it ALL about BushCo cronyism??

Third Question:
If a pedophile was in a high-level position at DHS, and nobody knew, then who ELSE is working at DHS?? Are there drug addicts, psychopaths, terrorist sympathizers, spies...?? Is this a new indication of a whole new area of incompetence from this administration??

Fourth Question:
Doesn't this warrant a top-to-bottom investigation and house-cleaning of the whole BushCo DHS??

I'm just sayin'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, this clown was a CAREERIST
And the job of the CAREERIST, traditionally, is to play "back up" to the political appointee in the "meet the press" position. So he should have had his clearance updated regularly...

It is troubling. I know that, awhile back, they had a SERIOUS backlog, and they devised a new system of prioritizing, which, clearly, as we see, ain't seeming to work too well.

They're probably outsourcing that work to India, too!

As for incompetence in BushCo, well, we hold some truths to be self-evident!!!!!

Investigation??? Until we take back the Hill, there won't be one. They don't like holding up the mirror and seeing what they really are...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Investigation
I hear you on taking back the Hill -- but it wouldn't hurt, to that end, to make some noise about the careless disregard for national security indicated by the presence of a pedophile in the department...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Oh, sure, we can PRESS for an investigation, but my guess is that
the Chertoff Brigade on the Hill will push for an internal DHS investigation. Can't air their dirty laundry, after all....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Even the pressing gets the questions out there...
And that alone is something.

There MIGHT even be scenarios that could alarm Freepers! Imagine...

Adult: "There could be KGB agents in DHS, with access to classified information."
Freeper: "That's okay, the Preznit saw into Putin's soul."

Adult: "There could be drug addicts or psychopaths in the DHS, with less than ideal judgment."
Freeper: "So? Lots of drug addicts and psychopaths go to work every day."

Adult: "There could be unknown Liberals in the DHS, who hate the preznit so much, they'd do ANYthing in their lust for power!"
Freeper: "OMIGOD!!!"
Adult: "Not only that, some of them could be GAY!!"
Freeper: "HOLY CRAP, THIS IS SERIOUS!! RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. If they are looking for gays, they just need to check their political
party leadership, like Ken Mehlman, and the Press Secretary, Scotty McFivechins, and that chubby bunny who was in the faith based office there in the WH. The hills are alive with the sound of music, over that way! Of course, that smell of cedar surrounding them is due to the fact that they spend all their time in the closet....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. send a letter to your local paper
there really is no "they" to do this. We have to step and add the pressure. I'm just saying :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Don't forget Bernie Kerik.
Smirky's first choice for DHS.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Kerik
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Ah yes, I had forgotten!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. I believe that, technically, if one is...
a Republican, no kind of perversion is considered to be a security risk. In fact, if one is a Republican, one cannot possibly have any kind of character flaws - Jesus washes all that away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. More questions
How did he find this child? Was Doyle's internet porn limited to this one incident? Are there any indications that this is not an isolated incident. If not, how many other times has he done this on government time with government resources? Was Doyle trolling on child porn websites or chat rooms?

If he is participating on child porn websites doesn't this type of behavior open him up to blackmail from other pedophiles? What involvment did Doyle have with DHS' "Operation Predator"?

In this instance, the child that Doyle was communicating with was in Florida. Was there any indication in his correspondence with this minor that he was willing to meet her. If so, how many trips has Doyle taken since he assumed office? What were the purposes of these trips? Were these trips requested by others or by Doyle? Does Doyle have a favorite or favorite traveling companions?

What does this tell us about the internet security and monitoring within the DHS itself? Was Doyle on a watchlist somewhere? Who hired him and what is his previous work experience?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Another question-Did her really think teenage girls would think he's cute?
Honestly, this ain't no Shaun Cassiday

Not exactly Tiger Beat material, is he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
12. From DHS website
"Most applicants under serious consideration for an appointment will go through a full FBI background check in which their employment, professional, personal, travel, medical, financial, legal, military and educational histories will be reviewed and scrutinized."

http://www.whitehouse.gov/appointments/

"Most" applicants... Hmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC