Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Warrantless Wiretaps Possible in U.S. (Gonzales)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:13 AM
Original message
Warrantless Wiretaps Possible in U.S. (Gonzales)
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 07:14 AM by ProSense
Paving the way to justify what they're already doing: spying on Americans:

Warrantless Wiretaps Possible in U.S.

By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, April 7, 2006; Page A03

Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales left open the possibility yesterday that President Bush could order warrantless wiretaps on telephone calls occurring solely within the United States -- a move that would dramatically expand the reach of a controversial National Security Agency surveillance program.

In response to a question from Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) during an appearance before the House Judiciary Committee, Gonzales suggested that the administration could decide it was legal to listen in on a domestic call without supervision if it were related to al-Qaeda.

"I'm not going to rule it out," Gonzales said.

In the past, Gonzales and other officials refused to say whether they had the legal authority to conduct warrantless eavesdropping on domestic calls, and have stressed that the NSA eavesdropping program is focused only on international communications.

more...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/06/AR2006040600764.html?nav=rss_nation




Audio at link:


Nation

Gonzales Frustrates Lawmakers on Domestic Spying

by Ari Shapiro

All Things Considered, April 6, 2006 · Attorney General Alberto Gonzales is grilled about federal domestic surveillance during an appearance at the House Judiciary Committee. Gonzales refused to elaborate on the program, other than to say he believes it is legal. Both Republicans and Democrats accused him of stonewalling.

more...

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5328576&ft=1&f=1003





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. there is other proof of this. also NPR this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Send this man a moral compass
better yet.. just throw him out of office...
a man so devoid of any sense of right and wrong
and especially an AG without any knowledge of the Constitution
is clearly incompetent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Gonzales Conspires To Break Law: Congress Sits On Hands"
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well, Al, I believe it is illegal and I've scanned the Constitution and
can't find any mention of 'super' presidential powers that override the Bill of Rights. So, STFU!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why do I have the sinking suspicion....
... that the reason this announcement was made was to cover *'s butt when it is soon revealed that the Junta has already been monitoring domestic communications in direct violation of existing law and Constitutional protections?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC