Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

America Can't Afford An Untrustworthy Pres...With A Rubber-Stamp Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 11:06 AM
Original message
America Can't Afford An Untrustworthy Pres...With A Rubber-Stamp Congress
Impeach the liars and drive his cronies out at election time, that is the one's who aren't indicted first.


Friday :: Apr 7, 2006

America Can't Afford An Untrustworthy President Working With A Rubber-Stamp Congress

by Steve Soto

Yesterday’s disclosures by Patrick Fitzgerald, confirming what many of us have suspected for years about Bush’s culpability in using intelligence for political purposes, has crystallized the argument that Democrats can make to nationalize the November election against vulnerable GOP incumbents. After yesterday, the message is quite simple:

“America can’t afford an untrustworthy president and a rubber stamp Republican Congress.”

The best the GOP can do to defend Bush is to issue a release this morning making the widely swallowed assertion that Bush has the authority to declassify information as he sees fit, and that Fitzgerald hasn’t said Bush authorized the outing of Valerie Plame. Yet this lame defense ignores the http://thinkprogress.org/2006/04/06/libby-bush-plame/">lies Bush has told about this and many other things, and overlooks the fact that this same administration is going after reporters for allegedly publishing leaked national security information.

The Post noted in its story this morning, as did the New York Times, ABC News, and the Los Angeles Times that Bush was now accused of participating in a leak of national security information, while he himself criticizes others for allegedly doing the same thing. The Post also notes this morning that the Administration has now admitted they may very well be wiretapping purely domestic calls by Americans inside the country without a court order, which is in violation of federal law. Both reinforce the theme that this president cannot be trusted, and America cannot afford a rubber stamp Congress enabling such a leader, especially when this Congress cannot discharge its basic duties due to infighting amongst themselves.

More importantly, the New York Times in its lead editorial connected the dots for the first time about the recent revelations that Bush and Cheney were advised early on that their claims about uranium from Africa and the aluminum tubes were suspect at best, and yet both continued to peddle these stories to sell the war and certify to Congress that the invasion was necessary. The Times is calling for Pat Roberts to get off his whitewashing ass and conclude the inquiry he promised over a year ago on how the Administration used intelligence to sell the war. Again, this marries the issues of a president who can’t be trusted with a rubber stamp Congress, and this theme can be hammered all spring to overcome any good economic news Bush will take credit for, even if job growth falls mainly in services and not in well-paying jobs.

Democrats have the issues and messages they need to nationalize this election, while still going after individual GOP representatives for their own ethical and legal transgressions tied to the Republican culture of corruption.

http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/007306.php




Why should any one believe the economic numbers? They have fudged the data on terrorism and climate change, and continue to lie about Iraq.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC