Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DURBIN, LINCOLN, INTRODUCE AFFORDABLE INSURANCE PLAN FOR SMALL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:47 PM
Original message
DURBIN, LINCOLN, INTRODUCE AFFORDABLE INSURANCE PLAN FOR SMALL
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 01:52 PM by caligirl
DURBIN, LINCOLN, INTRODUCE AFFORDABLE INSURANCE PLAN FOR SMALL BUSINESSES

Wednesday, March 16, 2005

– U.S. Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) today introduced legislation to give small businesses affordable choices among private health insurance plans and expand access to health care coverage for their employees.

The Small Employers Health Benefits Program (SEHBP) would allow small businesses across America to band together for lower health care prices by pooling their purchasing power and spreading their risk over a large number of participants. Employers would qualify for an annual tax credit to partially offset contributions on behalf of employees

The SEHBP is modeled after the highly successful Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP), which has offered members of Congress and government workers a wide range of private health insurance choices for more than 40 years. SEHBP would give employees of small businesses access to a comparable range of private health plans.

“Across Illinois, small business owners tell me time and time again that their biggest concern is the high cost of health insurance,” Durbin said. “At a time when more than 45 million Americans do not have health insurance and small businesses struggle to keep up with annual double-digit premium increases, our bill will put affordable options on the table for businesses that currently can’t afford to offer this important benefit to their workers.”

"The crisis of ever escalating health care costs is not going away, and in fact, it’s getting worse," Lincoln said. "I’ve heard from countless small business owners in Arkansas who have been forced to drop or dramatically reduce health insurance for their employees, even though they desperately want to offer it. Our small employers know that offering health insurance helps them with recruitment, retention, employee performance, and the overall success of the business. This is something I firmly believe Congress should address right now. My bill would help our small businesses, the true backbone of our communities, and it would allow us to begin to address the very real needs of the working uninsured."

http://www.senate.gov/~durbin/record.cfm?id=233715


Senator Lincolns press release with audio on her bill:http://lincoln.senate.gov/press_show.cfm?id=253631

"Lincoln’s bill, which combines the best of what the government can do with the best that the private sector can do, has been endorsed by and array of organizations including: the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Medical Association, the American Osteopathic Association, the Consumers Union, the Federation of American Hospitals, the National Association of Community Health Centers, the National Association of Women Business Owners, the Small Business Majority, the American Diabetes Association, the American Cancer Society, the National Mental Health Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the National Women’s Law Center."

"Lincoln’s audio remarks from today's hearing can be accessed at her toll-free actuality hotline at the following:

1-800-511-0763

ACCESS CODE #7557

Lincoln’s audio is also available in mp3 format at the following website:

http://demradio.senate.gov/actualities/lincoln/lincoln060406.mp3 "

My comments:
This bill is different from the Enzi bill in that it is modeled on the federal health insurance offered our Senators. It doesn't strip away state oversight and it is supported by the American Diabetes Association and other health advocacy groups. It is a good alternative to ther Enzi bill and I hope to see it introduced on the same day as the Enzi bill in early May(1-5).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. This will piss off pharmaceutical giants.
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 01:51 PM by Selatius
Letting people pool together will allow them to invoke collective bargaining power, and from the perspective of a for-profit corporation, this is not good. Profit maximization is the goal of any for-profit enterprise, and this would make it harder for them to gain bigger margins. I say let them be pissed off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. big pharma, as I understand it, is against the Enzi bill now, as I am.
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 01:57 PM by caligirl
If they want to come out against this bill let them, AARP has registered concerns today about the Enzi bill leading discriminating against older Americans. They had previously said they would not fight the Enzi bill nor support it, they were going to stay out of this one. I
'll get the press release and post it in a sec.

AARP press release raises concern over Enzi bill affects on older working Americans:
http://www.aarp.org/research/press-center/presscurrentnews/marketplace_bill.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Definitively better
http://sbc.senate.gov/democrat/record.cfm?id=252698

“If members of Congress have access to affordable health care, so should all Americans, including those who work in our small businesses -- our entrepreneurs. When I talk with small business owners, one of their top concerns is always health care, but Washington’s been silent until now,” said Kerry. “I believe the Democratic alternative to the Enzi bill is a better approach to solving the issues small businesses face in providing health care for their employees. We must not wait any longer while skyrocketing health care costs stand in the way of economic growth or prevent employers from providing coverage to hardworking people.”

The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee passed legislation this morning on a party-line vote sponsored by Chairman Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) that would allow trade associations to sell group health plans to small businesses. The Enzi bill is controversial because it targets its assistance only to members of Associations and preempts important state benefit mandates without giving states the choice of opting out, among other provisions.

The number of small firms with less than 200 employees offering health coverage has declined from 68 percent in 2005 to 59 percent in 2005, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation survey. In addition, only 59 percent of small businesses offer their employees health insurance, compared to 98 percent of large firms, according to the same study.

The Small Employers Health Benefits Program Act:

# Allows small businesses to pool their purchasing clout to negotiate lower rates and reduce administrative costs
# Recognizes that shared responsibility is the best way to make health coverage affordable with employers, employees, and government all contributing to costs. Employers who pay at least 60 percent of each employee’s health insurance premium would be eligible for a tax credit.
# Gives small business employees a wider array of affordable health care plan options, including the same kinds of health plans available to members of Congress.
# Sets reasonable rules on what insurers can charge, giving insurers some flexibility for premium charges, but prevents extreme variations that would make coverage unaffordable for those who need it most.
# Maintains state consumer protections. The bill requires participating health plans to be licensed in every state in which they operate and to abide by state consumer protection laws. State insurance commissioners would continue to regulate solvency, reviews, and other state requirements.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. one of the main reasons my wife and i closed shop
we had a decent window fashions business but had to fold it up because we needed health insurnace. the cost we were quoted for family coverage was more than our rent and utes on the store we had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Lincolns bill offers health insurance that has better coverage than
the junk plans enzi's bill would create. It actually helps people without hurting millions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. This sounds good, but to be honest ...
I've had enough of these insurance coverage "band-aids" that only cover certain portions of the population. EVERY AMERICAN needs and DESERVES health care coverage! Why are we the only industrialized nation who can't afford to do it? Every time BushCo wants more money to kill people in Iraq, they find the money - so why isn't there ever any money to keep people healthy (or educated) in this country? :grr:

/end rant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The California Nurses Association is working for National healthcare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That's great!
I hope other states get involved as well. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. I second that.
We're just spinning our wheels with health care plans that tie coverage to employment.

We can afford a single-payer plan. We have the highest per capita GDP in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good-I'm telling you small bus. is where the Dems can make much hay
The #1 employer in this country. You get on their good side and you will have the ins with most of their employees. As it is now we are getting KILLED with regard to the small businesses mostly due to "Tax" issues and perceptions on them.

I am telling you this is what Dean needs to be focusing on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. Our small business desperately needs help
We pay huge premiums for crappy coverage and very little choice in medical care. And we are lucky to have any coverage at all. The Republican response has ranged from "What problem?" to idiot reforms that just pump more money to their cronies and worsen the problem for everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Summary of Lincoln/Durbins bill, thanks to Lincoln"s staffer Drew,who
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 02:21 PM by caligirl
sent this to me today.


The Small Employers Health Benefits Program Act, S.2510
Senators Richard Durbin & Blanche Lincoln

Summary
The Small Employers Health Benefits Program (SEHBP) is based on the successful Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP), which has provided extensive benefit choices at affordable prices to members of Congress and federal employees for decades. Last year, more than eight million people were banded together in the FEHBP purchasing pool and given choices among 10 national health insurance plans and a variety of local insurance plans. A total of 278 private insurance plans offered benefits to, and competed for the business of FEHBP enrollees in 2006.

By pooling small businesses across America into one risk and purchasing pool like FEHBP, the new SEHBP program will allow employers to reap the benefits of group purchasing power and streamlined administrative costs, as well as access to more plan choices. Health plans will bid to offer benefit packages to SEHBP enrollees.

While all plans participating in the SEHBP program must adhere to state benefit mandates the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which has been efficiently managing FEHBP for decades with less than one percent administrative cost, will ensure that the health insurers bidding for access to the pool are offering reasonable prices. OPM will free small business owners from the burden of negotiating with health plans.

Finally, participating employers will receive a tax credit to reduce the cost of covering lower income employees. If the employer contributes 60 percent or more to the health insurance premium of an employee making $25,000 or less, the employer will receive a 25 percent tax credit. The tax credit increases with the number of people covered and the proportion of premium the employer chooses to cover.

Eligibility Requirements
The SEHBP program will be open to all employers with up to 100 employees, including the self-employed. OPM will have the authority to grant participation waivers to businesses with more than 100 employees.
To receive the tax credit, employers must agree to pay at least 60 percent of each employee’s health insurance premium.
All employees of participating SEHBP employers will be eligible to receive coverage through SEHBP.

Participation and Coverage
Employees may join SEHBP upon being hired or during an annual open enrollment period.
Prior to each annual enrollment period, employers will receive a booklet detailing the insurance plans available. OPM will work to ensure a range of choices are available, like in the federal employees plan.
Coverage choices are made by the employee. Each individual may choose a health plan according to his or her own needs. Like the federal employees plan, the options are likely to range from fee-for-service, in which most services provided by any doctor are covered with a co-payment, to HMOs, which offer lower prices with a more limited panel of doctors, to high-deductible plans, which require the first several thousand dollars of health care coverage be paid by the employee. The bill requires OPM to ensure a range of benefit plans is available.

SEHBP enrollees who have at least six months of health insurance coverage immediately prior to enrollment in an SEHBP plan will face no pre-existing condition waiting period. To prevent people from waiting until they get sick to enroll, health plans will be allowed to exclude coverage for pre-existing conditions for up to six months for people without coverage immediately prior to enrollment (reduced by one day for each day of immediately previous coverage). The pre-existing condition provisions are consistent with HIPAA.

In an effort to balance premium prices with consumer protections, participating plans will be allowed to apply “adjusted community rating” to their premiums. The SEHBP plan is similar to a model developed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners in 2000, which allowing plans to vary premiums based on age, geography and family composition within strict limits or to prevent extreme variations in price. Rating on health status, gender or industry is prohibited under SEHBP rating rules. If a state has rating rules that are stricter than the rules laid out in this bill, the state is held harmless, meaning they can maintain their current rating structure. In other words, SEHBP sets a floor.

Consumer Protections
SEHBP enrollees will be covered by state consumer protection laws, such as benefit mandates and solvency standards. State insurance commissioners will continue to regulate solvency, grievance processes, internal review and network adequacy laws, among other things.

Like in the FEHBP program, OPM will have the authority to require plans to limit enrollees’ annual out-of-pocket expenses, include patient consumer protections and provide parity for coverage of mental and physical health care.

Encouraging Participation among Health Plans
Health plans would be encouraged to participate in the new program through temporary use of a three percent risk corridor and a reinsurance pool for high-cost individuals. Risk corridors are contractual safeguards that limit the downside risk and upside gain for an insurer. The federal government has experience with risk corridors in TriCare. The risk corridor would be in place for two years.

In addition to the risk corridors, the SEHBP Act would set up a reinsurance pool that will initially protect participating insurers from unexpectedly high claims from individual beneficiaries. The reinsurance pool would pay 90 percent of an individual’s cost when claims exceed $50,000. The reinsurance pool would also be in place for two years.

Once the risk pool stabilizes and insurers have claims experience on which to accurately base their premiums, the program would switch to the “service charge” system currently employed by FEHBP.

Tax Credit
Under SEHBP, premiums will not be government-subsidized, but employers will receive an annual tax credit to defray part of the employer contribution. The SEHBP Act provides a refundable tax credit to employers for their payments on behalf of low-wage workers (those who make $25,000 or less per year.) The tax credit will be equal to 25 percent of their costs for self-only policies, 30 percent for those employees who are either married or single with a child and 35 percent for family policies. The wage limitation will be adjusted annually for inflation rate based on the CPI.

Employers who cover more than 60 percent of their employee’s premium will receive a bonus tax credit. The bonus will be equivalent to a 5 percent add-on per additional 10 percent of premium covered. So, an employer who covers 10 percent over the required employer portion will receive an additional 5 percent tax credit. If the employer covers an additional 20 percent of the premium, an additional 10 percent tax credit will be granted.

Employers who enroll in the first year will receive a 10 percent bonus refundable tax credit that year.

Table 1a: Example of Potential Costs assuming the Employer covers 60% of costs

Single Couple/Single Parent Family
Cost $4,000 $8,000 $10,000
Employer’s 60% $2,400 $4,800 $6,000
Tax Credit - $600 - $1,440 - $2,100
Net Employer Cost $1,800 $3,360 $3,900
Employee Cost $1,600 $3,200 $4,000



Table 1b: Example of Potential Costs assuming the Employer covers 80% of costs

Single Couple/Single Parent Family
Cost $4,000 $8,000 $10,000
Employer’s 80% $3,200 $6,400 $8,000
Tax Credit -$1,120 -$2,560 -$3,600
Net Employer Cost $2,080 $3,840 $4,400
Employee Cost $800 $1,600 $2,000



Endorsers of SEHBP
American Academy of Family Physicians
American Medical Association
American Osteopathic Association
Consumers Union
Federation of American Hospitals
National Association of Community
Health Centers
FamiliesUSA
National Partnership of Women and Families
National Association of Women Business Owners
Small Business Majority
American Diabetes Association
American Cancer Society
National Mental Health Association
American Academy of Pediatrics
National Women’s Law Center


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. The question is will it pass? Or will it be killed by corporatists? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. Just let everybody buy in
Subsidize it for low-income people, voila, national health care. It will need to be modified, most definitely, but it would be a huge stepping stone to single payer.

Since I am a small business though, I hope the Durbin-Lincoln bill goes through in a hurry and truly offers some kind of affordable insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is an issue we need to keep focusing on.
I've been so horrified at what's going on with health care costs (and the loss of coverage by many). We need to address the issues of affordability, eligibility, risk, etc., and fight off this crap health savings account plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. thanks, the Enzi bill is horrific and needs to be stopped. It
comes to the senate floor May 1-5. realtors sent 40 of their lobbying team to the senate in May to twist senate arms to get it passed. Not sure how many senators will vote for such a dispicable bill. The Lincoln Durbin bill will be brought up at the same time in May is what Iread somewhere today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
17. 'Appreciate the info on this bill, caligirl. And it occurs to me that
Durbin and Lincoln would make a strong ticket for the Democratic Party one of these days.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC