Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The one thing I've never heard a Democrat politician say

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 06:03 PM
Original message
The one thing I've never heard a Democrat politician say
Edited on Sun Apr-09-06 06:05 PM by Lastlaughin08
When asked or challenged by a RW shill/talk host/reporter about their (The Dems) plan for what to do about Iraq mess, I have yet to hear a Democrat politician say right up front "In the first place let me make it clear that I/we would never have made the unforgivable mistake of invading Iraq in the first place. George Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and no one else chose this course of action. We are in it thanks to them. Now, as to how we get out of the mess they created , I would........" and then go one to answer the question.

Democrat politicians should remind their interviewers and the American public that BUSH started this thing in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Brand W Republican" and "Bush's War" are two good suggestions
made this weekend. Whenever the Repugs are interviewed they
NEVER FAIL to ATTACK Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. The question that has NOT been discussed
is changing a US policy about NO pre-emptive first strike..That has been ignored in all the discussions of Bushit & Co fabricating the reason for the invasion. We have plenty of verified evidence of USSR & China having WMD and we NEVER did a pre-emptive strike...even AFTER the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Could have sworn I hear Howard Dean
Make statements just like that....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. If Dean has said that, they should all follow his lead
and throw it out every single time that BUSH AND HIS IMCOMPETENT ADMINISTRATION ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS MESS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yep, I've heard Clark say it too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
38. Dean and others ALL said none of the Democrats would've started a war
Edited on Mon Apr-10-06 02:01 PM by blm
knowing that weapons inspections were working to prove military action was not necessary. I will add that I don't even think Lieberman would have rushed invasion knowing that weapons inspectors were not finding anything.

I was glad when I first heard Dean, Kerry and others say it, and wished that media made a greater point out of their words, instead of always framing it using Rove talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #38
52. that's a good line IMO n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wes Clark said it many times
still does as far as I know

"I would not have gone into Iraq in the first place," he said. "My position was that Iraq was not an imminent threat. I would have concentrated on Osama bin Laden."

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/president/clark/articles/2004/02/11/clark_exits_presidential_bid_after_losses/

Also said it in the debates
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/july-dec03/debate_10-10.html

Council of Foreign Relations speech
http://www.cfr.org/publication/9845/iraq.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. But now Clark thinks we should stay there, doesn't he?
I don't agree there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. No, Clark doesn't think that we should stay there.....
Edited on Sun Apr-09-06 07:37 PM by FrenchieCat
He agrees that 2006 is the year of transition and that troops should be out of there as soon as possible.....as long as we don't leave an Iran Theocratic State upon our exit fighting not only a civil war but a regional war as well.....because he understands that two wrongs don't make a right....and that stuffing the top back on the Genie's bottle without the Genie inside is for naught. Pandora's box is what this Middle East Quagmire has been called for a reason.

Clark also believes that we should use our military as leverage to force negotiations by the Iraqis to form a government which includes the minorities and centralizes the oil revenues....although he didn't set a date like John Kerry....cause he knows that it means nothing for him to set a date that ends up passing by.....since it is the Bush admin that is running the show (whether we like it or not)....but he has pushed for the Bush admin to threatened deployment and the slow down of training and equipment if the Iraqi Leaders don't get their act together.

He also has urged that the U.S. foreswear any permanent bases in the region.

Edit to add that Wes Clark just about always prefaces any discussion of Iraq by saying...."A war we didn't have to fight"...."a Strategic Blunder"....."A War of Choice".....etc, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Thanks for clarifying, FrenchieCat, though I don't know how that
will be possible in the midst of a civil war.
The Iraqis should have had the negotiations down pat by now, but don't seem to be able to come
to any kind of an agreement. If we wait for them, we could be there for years, and that thought is intolerable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I don't think so.....
because part of having leverage in negotiating is that, at some point the leverage of pulling troops out has to be used if nothing happens.

If you think that this Iraqi Government, frail as it is, wants to be left without the U.S. Military protecting it.....that is incorrect....which is why John Kerry set the date of May 15th...because he too understands that the Iraqi Leaders don't want to be left without protection.

I think that Clark and Kerry's only difference in approach is that Clark feels that him setting a date won't make it an official Bush admin date.....and therefore won't influence the Iraqis to deal with that date....therefore setting up a prescribed plan for failure if the date were to come and go (which the Bush admin would make certain it does for their own reasons)....when it wasn't required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. AGREED!
And I think the Dems should preface EVERY QUESTION about their plans to get the country back on-track with a finger-point at this Administration, to whit:

What would you do about the economy? Answer: "First of all, I WOULDN'T DO what the Republicans have done ....," followed by their plan.

What would you do about making FEMA more effective? Answer: "First of all, I WOULDN'T DO what the Republicans did ...," followed by their ideas on making FEMA more responsive.

DO THIS WITH EVERYTHING! POINT THE FINGER! REMIND THE PUBLIC THAT ALL OF THESE DISASTROUS MOVES have been the brainchild of Republicans, NOT Democrats.

The Repubs are constantly saying the Dems have no ideas of their own, all they can do is nay-say everything the GOP does, or will do in future.

TURN THAT MESSAGE AROUND ON THE GOP! "Of course we've nay-said everything they've come up with. Who wouldn't? These people are incompetent fools, and the American people are suffering as a consequence of THEIR actions, not OURS."

(Sorry - didn't mean for that to turn into a rant. But this 'no message, all they can do is nay-say us crap really sticks in my craw!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Good rant! - I'm with you 110% - It needs to be said EVERY time.
Edited on Sun Apr-09-06 06:18 PM by Lastlaughin08
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Always meant to tell you, LastLaughIn08 ...
... that EVERY TIME I see your on-line name, it makes me SMILE!

It reminds me that better days are ahead - and not only will WE have big smiles on our faces when the next Democratic president in sworn-in, so will our fellow Americans, regardless of party affiliation!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
13.  Nothing would make me happier................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, most of them can't since they voted to allow
it.

It seems to me anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. Odd statement, since almost all of them have
So, like the OP, you're either uninformed or intentionally lying. And like the OP, I'll leave it to you to say which it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
34. It may seem that way but it's not true
More dems in the House voted against it than for it. Slightly less than half of the dem Senators voted against it. (22 + Jeffords).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. yes, I see that is true
I was expressing anger at my perception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. If you're going to use the D word as an adjective...
Edited on Sun Apr-09-06 06:30 PM by wryter2000
If you're going to use the D word as an adjective, it would be better to add the "ic" to it. Democratic. Repugs use Democrat as an adjective as an insult. Pombo did it on TV on Friday night. "Democrat politician" with a sneer. He made it sound gawd awful.

Not a criticism. Just a suggestion. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Correction: Democratic
Just a reminder, Republicans usually refer them as "Democrat"...

Just thought you might want to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. I believe both Dean and Clark have said it before
Edited on Sun Apr-09-06 07:20 PM by BattyDem
As a matter of fact, Dean said it last week on one of the news shows (I think it was Blitzer). I'm not sure of his exact words, but he basically said, "Let me start by saying that I never supported the invasion of Iraq; I thought it was wrong. But now that we're there, we must do what we can ... yada, yada, yada."

On edit: Gore criticized Bush's Iraq policy both before and after the war started.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. Too bad those in a position to vote were lied to and
given false information, as were we all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. "Democrat Politician"?
That term makes me tune out .......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. Democrat-IC. It's an adjective.
Edited on Sun Apr-09-06 07:28 PM by blondeatlast
Even though I'm not traditionally a grammar corrector, I used to teach English in high school, and this particular grammatical error makes me batpoop crazy.

Please use it correctly. I know I'm not the only DUer who feels this way by far.

Democrat is a noun; as in: I, blondeatlast, am a Democrat.

Democratic is an adjective; as in: I support Democratic politicians.

Thanks.

Sorry for the grammar lesson, but this really gets to many DUers, not just me, I know.

Edit: I notice you used the term "Republican" correctly in your profile, so this simple change shouldn't be asking too much of you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. OK, you guys win. My point totally was lost by grammatical errors.
Edited on Sun Apr-09-06 07:51 PM by Lastlaughin08
But the fact remains our party needs to remind the world that BUSH planned and started this whole Iraq mess, and I'll stick to that belief until I die, grammatical errors or not.

The Middle East (or worse) could go up in smoke any day now, thanks to GWB and his band of incompetent fools, but by gosh I'll know proper adjective use when the big cloud comes............................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I think that you are right....that our nation needs to be reminded
Edited on Sun Apr-09-06 07:52 PM by FrenchieCat
every damn day that this was Bush's war.

They also need to be reminded of This:

"The Greatest threat to American people - what they really have to worry about is the threat to liberty and Democracy right here in America. They (the Bush Admin) thrive on scaring the American people."
--Wes Clark in his 3/27/06 podcast
http://feeds.feedburner.com/clarkcast.mp3?d=2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cspanlovr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
24. Why are you saying "Democrat" instead of "Democratic", please
don't use "their" terminology for us. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Let's just forget it, I'm sorry I posted in the first place.
Edited on Sun Apr-09-06 08:17 PM by Lastlaughin08
I'll check in Nov. 8th to see if we made any headway. See you all then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. You got caught is what happened. Only Republicans use "Democrat" as
an adjective and they do it deliberately. Or at least some of them do and others do also as they quote the talking points. It is not just a grammatical mistake as you are trying to say. This has been noted many times here on DU so the fact that you didn't know that pretty much establishes your Republican troll status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. Caught? Like hell I was. Grammatical error as I said, yes.
Edited on Mon Apr-10-06 04:46 PM by Lastlaughin08
I love the way some (thankfully very, very few) DUers think they know everything there is to know about other DU members. I rather be than dead than vote for a Republican, especially after what they've done in recent years. I haven't voted for a Republican since 1962 when I first registered to vote. I've been a member of organized labor since 1960 and know how the right wing dumps on the working guy. Don't ever accuse me of being a Republican troll.

Maybe you should cut fellow DU members some slack now and then when they admit to having made a grammatical mistake.............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
26. Almost all of them have said it
Kerry, Edwards, Harkin, Murtha, the list goes on. Either you're uninformed or intentionally lying. I'll leave you to say which it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. Well if they are saying it, it isn't often and loud enough.
And don't be calling me a liar, sport.

Your kind doesn't exactly inspire newcomers to the party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. So obvious
It's getting to be comical. Challenge somebody's bullshit and it's either "freedom of speech" or "newcomers to the party". I didn't call you a liar, I said that was your call to make. I guess you're choosing intentionally uninformed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Maybe someday I can claim to know it all, as you do - meantime, chill out
Edited on Mon Apr-10-06 04:27 PM by Lastlaughin08
and work get these RW bums out in '06 and '08, before there's no America left to fix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Argument of last resort, "chill out" lol n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
28. DemocratIC politician
Don't fall into the GOP's stupid linquistic trap.

Democratic is the adjective, not Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #28
36. Exactly....
DemocratIC!!!!

Don't let the other side "frame" even our Party's name!

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
29. .....and you won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
31. The Republican counterattack is;
"Look at the mess we made. Democrats have no plans to get us out of it".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
32. Actually this has been said across the board by many Dems
many, many times. It would be shorter to list the number of Dems who said that they would invade, knowing what they know now. (Maybe Lieberman?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
33. That's because of how the neocon/fundies frame the question...............
...it's never "what would you have done differently in the beginning". It's always "now that we are there" what would you do differently". So get the press to ask the right question for once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
37. Actually, Gore has said many times he would have never invaded Iraq
I just sayin'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkBayh 2008 Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Dems should never ever answer hypothetical questions
Our handlers suck.
The post is totally irrelevant at this point.
Totally.

This is 2006.
Let's move on if we want to actually win an electoral majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. Umm - sure - just because you said so! And all since late February!
Hmmmmm...

Another low poster newbie comming out to tell US what WE should do - just like ignoring the swiftboaters and bush*s past history!

Hmmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
40. Could say "First thing to do is admit that Bush made a terrible mistake
in choosing to go to war with Iraq, and that he made an even graver mistake when he chose to mislead Congress and the American people about his reasons for invading Iraq. It is this deception at the war's initiation that is responsible for the American public's current disillusionment with the conflict. Only by addressing the issue of lies about weapons of mass distruction in an open, frank debate can we regain the trust of the American people. And without the will of the American people behind us, no solution will ever be found to this conflict."


How does this sound for a Democratic message?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
45. Democrat politician? Is that you Rush?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
47. While it's been said................
you've hit on a critical point. Dems have been debating the Iraq War on the merits of strategy and committment. Rare is the Democrat in congress who turns the debate towards the decision to go into Iraq in the first place (partly the result of all the yeah votes from Dems). It can't be stated enough how devestating the Democrat capitulation on the decision to go to war has been. Debating war strategy is worthless and futile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
49. It's Democrat-IC, thanks
I wish DUers would not use the right wing's shortened version.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #49
54. I wasn't aware of a RW "shortened version", but some don't believe that
Edited on Tue Apr-11-06 08:20 AM by Lastlaughin08
I hope their anger gets channeled to the ballot box in November, where it will do some good.

And let's stop letting the RW define the liberal cause. That's what the SwiftLiars
did to Kerry '04 and look what happened to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
50. Suggested talking points for Dems who voted for the war
http://vastleft.blogspot.com/2006/03/ok-dems-who-authorized-iraqi-war.html
___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
51. You're listening to the wrong Democrats.
They don't say it, because it isn't true. They supported the Bush administration's war game.

Look for those that didn't vote for the IWR, then see what they had to say publicly. If you can find an archived transcript. They usually aren't media darlings, and what they have to say often goes unnoticed or unappreciated.

They are out there, if you spend enough time uncovering them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galatea Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
53. hmmmmm
that would take courage and honesty, I think?

Calling Bush a war criminal is the last thing they want. It will upset the Red State scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #53
55. The Red State scum deserves to get upset - or worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC