|
Pardon the brief tangent ...
I'm not very familiar with Tulsa politics, but I note your 2025 project sounds a lot like the MAPS project in OKC. (If I'm wrong on that, ignore me.) MAPS and things related to it did some good things for the city, superficially. Downtown has been turned into something of a showplace ... lots of upscale bars, restaurants, a ballpark, enormous movie theatre, a friggin' Bass Pro Shops. Not that all of this was funded by MAPS, but without MAPS, it probably wouldn't be there. My lingering memory of downtown/Bricktown as seen from I-40 is an old, broken-down U-Haul trailer on top of a crumbling brick building. It screamed, "GET OUT WHILE YOU CAN!!!"
Not a good image.
But, despite all this, the underlying point of MAPS, and I'm assuming Tulsa's project, is to benefit corporate business interests, i.e. use tax revenue essentially to fund private business, so of course Lafortune is going to support it. This isn't necessarily a bad thing overall, but it can be managed very poorly and has been to a degree in OKC. Furthermore, despite the rhetoric, the big winners in the scheme are the corporations, many of which aren't even based in Oklahoma. Again superficially, I like what has happened to downtown OKC, but I don't like the fact the city continues to lose what was left of its industrial base while a very small number of people are getting supremely wealthy through a regressive tax. MAPS was supposed to save everything, a lot of poor fools believed that. MAPS made a downtown Disneyland, yeah, but real jobs are still pouring out of the city.
In any case, congrats to Tulsa on its choice of a mayor.
|