Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hypothetical: If Bush's "leak" had not been traced back to him..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 01:04 PM
Original message
Hypothetical: If Bush's "leak" had not been traced back to him..
...would it have still qualified as being "declassified"? How would anyone know?

Did it actually become declassified when it was traced to him?

Why aren't reporters asking this question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. They're trying to cover up the obvious, hence their lies become obvious
Edited on Tue Apr-11-06 01:22 PM by EVDebs
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2563065&mesg_id=2563065

When they go about saying 'we believed the WMDs were there', when intell insiders were screaming at them that they weren't, and then subsequent reports from groups like the UN and ISG follow-up (David Kay and Chas. Duelfer) prove the WMDs were non-existent...it's pretty hard to not look foolish.

Lives were at stake and BushCo got it all wrong. David Kay in Jan 2004 testimony used about those words

Transcript: David Kay at Senate hearing
Wednesday, January 28, 2004
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/01/28/kay.transcript/

"Let me begin by saying, we were almost all wrong, and I certainly include myself here." Later, Mr. Kay was the victim of data theft at SAIC:

Break-In At SAIC Risks ID Theft
Computers Held Personal Data on Employee-Owners
by Griff Witte
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, February 12, 2005; Page E01
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17506-2005Feb11.html

Pay back ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. a very good question. I think we all know the answer to that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. What I want to know is this:
If it was declassified, then why didn't everyone know that 3 years ago? Why wasn't it common knowledge among journalists, politicians, etc? Why would they have appointed a Special Prosecutor to trace the leaks, if the information was declassified, and therefore, NOT leaked? :P

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. It was never declassified, and Fitz knows it according to his filings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. But Fitz was only and specifically looking at the Plame issue
and from what I know, the admitted leak/declassification portion was all of the stuff except the Plame identity leak.

Does that dog hunt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC