Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Election Results LIVE (FRANCINE!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 10:18 PM
Original message
Election Results LIVE (FRANCINE!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. WOOT! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Any chance of her winning the inevitable run-off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's a long shot
Edited on Tue Apr-11-06 10:33 PM by Mz Pip
but would be monumental if she did. THis is a serious Repug District. They would vote for a sea urchin if it had (R) next to its name.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. 18 Vie For Vacant House Seat In 50th Congressional District
For the benefit of those of us that have no clue who the players are in this district:

18 Vie For Vacant House Seat In 50th Congressional District

Eighteen candidates in a solidly GOP district on the Southern California coast competed in a special election Tuesday for the congressional seat once held by Randy "Duke" Cunningham, now in prison for bribery.

Brian Bilbray, a former congressman-turned-lobbyist who was the choice of the GOP establishment; Republican businessman Eric Roach, who spent $1.8 million of his own money; and Democrat Francine Busby were considered the front-runners.

Cunningham represented the House district from 1993 until he resigned in disgrace late last year. In March, the former Vietnam War fighter ace was sentenced to more than eight years in federal prison for taking $2.4 million in bribes from defense contractors.

Tuesday's race had a wide-open ballot, with 14 Republicans, two Democrats, one Libertarian and one independent. If no one got more than 50 percent of the vote, the top finisher from each party would compete in a runoff June 6.

The winner will serve out the remaining eight months of Cunningham's term, and will almost certainly try to hold on to the seat come November.

http://www.kfmb.com/stories/story.46177.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Go Francine!
~ ~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Democrat Takes Early Lead In Special Election
Democrat Takes Early Lead In Special Election

SAN DIEGO -- Francine Busby, the lone Democrat in the race to replace disgraced former U.S. Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, has taken an early lead in the 50th District special election.

As of 8:30 p.m., the only Democrat in the race, Busby had 42.23 percent of votes tallied, NBC 7/39 reported. Her closest Republican rival, Brian Bilbray, 14.15 percent of the vote. Republican Eric Roach followed closely behind with 13.92 percent.

Voters were scarce at a sampling of polling places in the wealthy coastal district Tuesday morning, NBC 7/39 reported. Volunteers at a polling place in San Diego's Del Mar Heights neighborhood reported only 16 people had voted by lunchtime.

"I feel completely betrayed, not just by Cunningham but by the policies of the Bush administration," said Roach voter John Towers, a 51-year-old college math instructor from Cardiff who described himself as a fiscal conservative. "I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of Republicans are so disgusted they just stay home."

http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/8631955/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American liberal Donating Member (915 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. polls have been closed 2 hours and they still have only
0.9% reporting? What's up with that?

You don't think she can break 50%? I do. Go Francine! We're all pulling for you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. All the voting today was paper & pen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American liberal Donating Member (915 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Thank you for the explanation! There's another thread on GD
Can you post there, as well? Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's too bad the other Dem didn't get more support
...had he gotten more support and come in second behind busby, it would be inevitable this district would change parties. Unfortunately Chris Young's barely makin it :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. Chris is a she... And I think she just was there to confuse the issue...
I had a voicemail on my answering machine claiming that only Chris Young was "conservative enough" to win what was claimed to be the inevitible runoff primary with whoever won amongst the Republicans. That's a load of bull of course. Francine is just right in terms of her moderate stances for this district. She actually used to be a Republican.

Chris Young was there in effect to steal votes from confused Dem voters and keep her from going over 50%. Fortunately only 1.53% of the voters have taken the bait so far, but that might still make the difference in the end!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #24
39. combine the Dem votes you get 45 against 55 Repugs/Lib
We can still win this, all she needs is to get 5 more percentage points gained against that bilbray guy. So far she has a good start!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. From what I saw of Earnest, I think she can get votes from him too...
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 11:20 AM by calipendence
He seemed to be the only decent Republican that was at the candidate's forum the other night. He even came out and attacked the "attack ads" from the Republicans and stated, "You know the same ad could be run against all of us. We've all taken donations from lobbyists." He then went on to try and infuse more decency and less partisanship in his positions in the debate. He wanted to come off as somoene that would get rid of corruption. I think many a moderate was probably attracted to him. Had he been more popular and also taken more of the extreme right wingers votes had he got in the runoff, I might be more afraid of someone like him not giving moderate votes to Busby, but I think many of the folks that voted for him might be more attracted to Busby than they might be to Bilbray. Bilbray was the GOP's man. He's tried to wrap a moderate logo around himself. He's supposedly pro-choice, etc. But he's also a lobbyist, which I think we need to go after BIG TIME. He's the "corporate" choice I think to keep the status quo alive. I think I'd like to see Busby now really go after trying to get public financing on her side and for us all to explain how public financing isn't only for "liberals", but that it takes special interest lobbyists like Bilbray out of politics, and the corruption mess that we're facing out of politics too. That it can be used for true conservatives or moderates to also represent people as much as those on the left, instead of representing corporate America.

Bilbray won't be easy. He's wrapping himself with Jerry Sanders' and other mayoral endorsements from around here. But Francine has also had some mayoral endorsements (even Republicans) from around here too.

I'm still wondering if Bilbray "conveniently" had more votes than Roach did. Roach almost succeeded in "buying" his way into the runoff. Closer than Francis did in a similar role against Jerry Sanders and Donna Frye. I wonder if the Diebold Central Tabulators might have been "tweaked" in his favor. The polls showed Roach further ahead of Bilbray before the election. People speculated that Roach might have been someone that would have been easire for Busby to beat than Bilbray. Some of the Rethugs behind the scenes might also have been speculating that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Apparently there's still 10000 votes to be counted
absentees and provisional. That may or may not make a difference in the final outcome once they are all counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. A lot of absentees are provisional...
People either bring their absentee ballots to the polling station (where they are counted after the fact), or they lose them or can't get to them so they are then given a provisional ballot. That's probably where a lot of the provisional ballots are coming from, though perhaps a few are probably from McPherson's snafu too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. SOoooOo.. question..
If Francine somehow eeks out anything over 50%, she'll win and they won't have a runoff?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yep
highly unlikely. But if it happens, it will be the lead story on the national news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Right.
And anybody coming in second will be her opponent int he runoff. Meaning, if the other Dem got more support, it would have been possible to have two Dem candidates in the runoff and an inevitability for switching parties. It's too bad that didn't happen and Chris Young didn't get enough support for that to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Thanks guyz.. & yeah, they ARE slow at updating those numbers!
They don't seem to be in a big hurry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Right now, it's still absentees
Normally, absentee ballots are skewed Republican. I don't know if that's the case in this district, but if it is, then that's a good sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. ALL of those are absentees ??
Wow! Populated area!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hi, ruggerson. I'm good-vibin' as hard as I can.
I'd just love to see Francine Busby take this without a run-off, but no matter the exact %, I hope she is the winner.

It'll be a big blue headline for the next day's papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. hey OC
We'll see in a couple of hours. She's really a terrific woman, and incredibly intelligent. She will make us all very proud if she makes it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yes, yes. And I hope the wave of the future for more races in Nov. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
19. They updated it slightly, but Francine is still @ 42%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. lol
a bit like watching paint dry :boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Really....
US REP. 50TH DIST.

Precincts: 445
Counted: 33
Percentage: 07.4%

Vote for: 1
FRANCINE BUSBY
29037
42.19%

BRIAN P. BILBRAY
10043
14.59%

ERIC ROACH
9652
14.02%

HOWARD KALOOGIAN
5093
7.40%

BILL MORROW
4810
6.99%

ALAN UKE
2841
4.13%

RICHARD EARNEST
1808
2.63%

BILL HAUF
1180
1.71%

CHRIS YOUNG
1103
1.60%

WILLIAM GRIFFITH
690
1.00%

SCOTT TURNER
642
0.93%

VICTOR E. RAMIREZ
544
0.79%

PAUL KING
490
0.71%

JEFF NEWSOME
395
0.57%

SCOTT ORREN
194
0.28%

DELECIA HOLT
171
0.25%

BILL BOYER
103
0.15%

MILTON GALE
32
0.05

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
23. She's eeeking up a teensie, tiny bit...
TopBack



US REP. 50TH DIST.

Precincts: 445
Counted: 99
Percentage: 22.2%

Vote for: 1
FRANCINE BUSBY
33399
42.88%

BRIAN P. BILBRAY
11826
15.18%

ERIC ROACH
10848
13.93%

HOWARD KALOOGIAN
5499
7.06%

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. Kaloogian shoulda stayed in Istanbul an ran for mayor.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
25. Hi again all you classy folks. Can I ask a question?
Is Francine favored against any Republican, or is the heavy GOP registration going to make it close?

I. want. Francine. to. replace. that. jerk. Cunningham.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
26. Updated Busby 43.28
FRANCINE BUSBY



45963



43.28%

BRIAN P. BILBRAY



16268



15.32%

ERIC ROACH



15197



14.31%

HOWARD KALOOGIAN



7856



7.40%

BILL MORROW



6148



5.79%

ALAN UKE



4271



4.02%

RICHARD EARNEST



2360



2.22%

BILL HAUF



1725



1.62%

CHRIS YOUNG



1490



1.40%

SCOTT TURNER



1424



1.34%

WILLIAM GRIFFITH



917



0.86%

VICTOR E. RAMIREZ



734



0.69%

PAUL KING



662



0.62%

JEFF NEWSOME



491



0.46%

SCOTT ORREN



278



0.26%

DELECIA HOLT



209



0.20%

BILL BOYER



160



0.15%

MILTON GALE



45



0.04%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. she gained a percentage
I wonder if she'll only get better by the time they are done counting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. If she were here, she would have won... It's 45% still for Mayor...
Although our popular D Mayor won it by a much larger margin last week..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Well... let me change that.. she'd win when she hits 45%
I hope she can somehow get to 50!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
31. Another update.........

US REP. 50TH DIST.

Precincts: 445
Counted: 418
percentage: 93.9%

Vote for: 1
FRANCINE BUSBY
54370
43.89%

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
So she will have to depend on the other votes they'll be counting to see if she gets to 50% ... is that right? She doesn't have far too go!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. they've already counted 418 of the precincts?
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 02:09 AM by Tiggeroshii
where are you checking??

on edit: nevermind... they just changed it :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Click on the results link on Ruggerson's first thread..
I guess all of these votes are absentees only?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. It's most likely she won't get 50 tonight.
Let's hope that is different in the runoff...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. But don't they have other votes to still count besides the absentee?
Before this special election is over? Sorry.. I'm not sure how it works there, but they said this list we're looking at is "absentees only"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. No, I'm pretty sure this is most of the votes
.. I think what they meant was that at that point they only counted absentees. They've counted far more than absentees now. The only way she'll win now is if all the rest of the votes are for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Oh.. okay.
She did good.. But when you tally up the amount of votes for all those R-Thugs, she's going to have a hell of a time converting them..

Crazy how they'd stick with the Culture of Corruption just to punch the "R" on the ballot..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. We'll see in June.
Really the later the runoff happens teh better. Have a good night!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #35
41. I think "other votes" might count provisionals...
Don't know how significant the number of new voters (of which 23% or so might have not been "registered" with McPherson's newest voter database mess), but if a lot of new voters voted, there might be a number of provisionals to look at too. Most likely though, they won't be significant to affect the outcome.

I know the precinct I was working told me that they had something like 3-4 provisional ballots in addition to the 50 regular votes they had cast around 4:00 PM. Afterwards I think I might have gotten a few people to vote provisionally who I talked to who'd recently registered and hadn't gotten back voter cards, pamphlets, etc. who I told to go vote provisionally. The problem is that those who did vote provisionally, noone knows the makeup of these people. They were probably not on the voter lists that we were going through, and it's hard to know what demographic makeup they were. The one I talked to seemed rather young, I think part Afro-American, and were just moving into the condos there. I suspect others were similar folks like that. We need to go out on a voter "re-registration" campaign before June to get some of those folks on the registration rolls, which the Rethugs along with McPherson appear to have been trying to remove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
44. Thanks to DFA and PDA for their hard work
CA for Democracy numbers Francine among its membership, and PDA was out in force , sponsoring bus trips to the district from farther North LA Area.

Phone banking was accomplished by many including virtula phone banking, where each member called a small list of voters.

According to the NYT this showing by Francine mans the republicans are in deep shit, but you could swing a teherball in that district and hit someone who could tell you that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. I think in some ways we may have overdone the GOTV efforts...
I've had at least two people and perhaps more (who didn't tell me), who were upset at the barrage of contacts we had with them, and two of them said they were inclined to *NOT* vote for Francine because of that. One of them I think I talked out of it, but the other seemed pretty dead set to not change her mind.

I was telling our Dem leader that perhaps we need to have better means to keep track of the contacts we make with folks, so that we don't reach that tipping point with any of them. Have some way to determine if they are and have some central DB that indicates who's at that limit, so that we don't turn off voters too.

Some might be good to do some further persuading. Others might be better left alone to make their own decision. Trying to figure out who is or who isn't is probably more of an art than a science, and perhaps hard for most of us that aren't professionally trained at sensing this when we're the grunts making the calls and knocking on doors, etc.

I think we need to take care and not treat this too much like a telemarketing setup, which I think it might have gotten to at some point. With telemarketing, you don't care as much about the people you PO in the process of trying to reach that small group of people you can arm twist into buying stuff with. With elections, we need to have a high percentage satisfaction rate, and that means trying to measure folks' satisfaction and trying to keep them satisfied on any subsequent contacts we might make. I don't have all of the answers for this, but I do sense a problem here that perhaps needs to be dealt with constructively before June timeframe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. You just gave me a flashback to Iowa
On the ground there, people were REALLY tweaked with the number of contacts they were getting.

I think if you could get into specifics with me in a PM it might help DFA hone or soften their message. I have no influence over the PDA except that I talk to them ogften and we share some members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thatsrightimirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
47. the good news is
The Democratic turnout should be better in June because of the Democratic Primary between Westly and Angelides on the same ballot. And her percentage did go up from the last time she ran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC