|
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 02:29 PM by The Magistrate
The politics of this matter are a vexed mixture, but a good line can be extracted from them for the present situation.
There is no doubt that immigration, and particularly illegal immigration, acts to depress wage levels, and so operates against working people's interests here in the United States. There really is no ground from which to dispute this, as it is the most elementary maxim of the subject that to increase the aggregate supply of an article will depress the price each individual article of that sort can command. Thus the principal backers of immigration, and of illegal immigration particularly, are and always will be various business lobbies seeking further advantage for employers, and there will always be a substantial opposition to the practice from native working people, that it would be most unwise to dismiss out of hand as mere racism.
In our nation's political life, however, ethnic and identity concerns have become major factors, and often obscure simple economic and class analysis and concerns. Whether this is a good thing or not is of no importance: it is a fact of our present political life, and must be weighed into any calculations. There is no doubt at all that immigrant citizens, and citizens of first generation descent from immigrants, as well as wholly native Hispanic citizens, view the clamor raised about an "immigration crisis" as an offensive against their ethnic identity, and an attempt to deprive them of status as "Americans" in this country. The Hispanic population is somewhat in flux in regards to political loyalty, and this current situation is turning them decidely against the Republican Party. The effect has been seen on a smaller scale already: the current status of California as a Democratic stronghold owes a great deal to the hard anti-illegal immigrant line pressed a decade ago by the state Republican Party there. There is reason to expect now that this same thing will take hold on the national level.
The best course for the Democratic Party would seem to be about what is being pursued, namely steadfast opposition to the Sennsenbrenner proposals, while seeing to it that nothing else really comes to replace these in the popular view as the "policy" being threatened by the Republican government.
|