Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Generals keep piling on

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 10:05 PM
Original message
Generals keep piling on
WP
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12280913/

Retired generals step up pressure on Rumsfeld
Secretary of defense hounded about leadership, handling of Iraq war

Updated: 10:17 p.m. ET April 12, 2006

The retired commander of key forces in Iraq called yesterday for Donald H. Rumsfeld to step down, joining several other former top military commanders who have harshly criticized the secretary of defense's authoritarian style for making the military's job more difficult.

"I think we need a fresh start" at the top of the Pentagon, retired Army Maj. Gen. John Batiste, who commanded the 1st Infantry Division in Iraq in 2004-05, said in an interview. "We need leadership up there that respects the military as they expect the military to respect them. And that leadership needs to understand teamwork."

Batiste noted that many of his peers feel the same way. "It speaks volumes that guys like me are speaking out from retirement about the leadership climate in the Department of Defense," he said earlier yesterday on CNN.Batiste's comments resonate especially within the Army because it is widely known there that he was offered a promotion to three-star rank to return to Iraq and be the No. 2 U.S. military officer there, but declined because he no longer wished to serve under Rumsfeld. Also, before going to Iraq, he worked at the highest level of the Pentagon, serving as the senior military assistant to Paul D. Wolfowitz, then the deputy secretary of defense.

String of high-profile attacks
Batiste said that he believes the administration's handling of the Iraq war has violated fundamental military principles, such as unity of command and unity of effort. In other interviews, Batiste has said he believes that the violation of another military principle of ensuring enough forces helped create the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal by putting too much responsibility on incompetent officers and undertrained troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Holy.Fucking.Shit
This isn't about ot stop anytime soon. Here's a guy who gave up a third star based on real principles.

He and so many others ........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. That's why I believe...
this is so important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Apparently the miltary is looking for good officers now
because they've had a whole lot of seasoned brass retire over the stupidity of this whole thing.

Active duty military can't speak out, especially the brass. That they quit early and gave up higher rank and pensions just to speak out says more than a thousand lying speeches out of the maladministration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I suspect they're gertting their pensions
They just need 20 years in. Most of the big guys have way more than that. Surely this guy did. But still, it takes an act of true principle to walk from another star.

The really disillusioned are the younger members of the officer corps ... the captains and lieutnents and majors ... tomorrow's leaders who won't be there when we need them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. READ THIS...
NYT
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/10/washington/10army.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Young Officers Leaving Army at a High Rate
By THOM SHANKER
Published: April 10, 2006

WASHINGTON, April 9 — Young Army officers, including growing numbers of captains who leave as soon as their initial commitment is fulfilled, are bailing out of active-duty service at rates that have alarmed senior officers. Last year, more than a third of the West Point class of 2000 left active duty at the earliest possible moment, after completing their five-year obligation.

It was the second year in a row of worsening retention numbers, apparently marking the end of a burst of patriotic fervor during which junior officers chose continued military service at unusually high rates.

Mirroring the problem among West Pointers, graduates of reserve officer training programs at universities are also increasingly leaving the service at the end of the four-year stint in uniform that follows their commissioning.

To entice more to stay, the Army is offering new incentives this year, including a promise of graduate school on Army time and at government expense to newly commissioned officers who agree to stay in uniform for three extra years. Other enticements include the choice of an Army job or a pick of a desirable location for a home post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I saw that ...... it is a serious matter
This is the future. But, if you think about it, the whole bush junta has been in the here and now. EVERYTHING gets swept into the future ... for the Dems to clean up.

You recall when President Fuckwad came out and said it would be up to a FUTURE president o decide when to clear out of Iraq?

And that pesky deficit. Not theirs to worry about, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You got it...
They fucked EVERYTHING up and left it for the next man/woman to clean up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rumsfeld only credentials were of being a loyal bushbot
as you can see by his results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Actually, I think he was more a loyal Cheneybot
And bush is the same. Cheneybots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Unfortunately, these guys have been a plague on this country....
...long before Bush...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. Clark: "(Rumsfeld) gets them to say what he wants them to say."
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 12:55 AM by Clarkie1
I would like to point out that previously Clark has stated he would fire Rumsfeld and resigning after the torture scandals would have been "a very patriotic thing to do." This gives some insight into Rumsfeld dictatorial style (I guess he shares that with G.W.):

"The President’s never listened to the people in the field. He’s listened to Rumsfeld who has assured him that he knew what the people in the field were saying. But what he’s done is he’s intimidated a lot of people in the field from…they know what the required answer is and a lot of them trim their sails when they talk to Rumsfeld. They know what the consequences will be if they tell it to him straight and, of course Rumsfeld plays on that. He makes them think they’re worry-warts. He makes them think they don’t have confidence in themselves. He pushes on them, gets them to say what he wants them to say. He’s a master at it."

http://securingamerica.com/node/773

"He makes them think they don't have confidence in themselves." What a great leadership style.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. * wouldn't know...
what's happening in th field if it bit him in the ass. besides he wouldn't know what to do with the info anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Clark said that in September 2003 - FIRE Rumsfeld
I could pull every fucking hair out of my head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sure are a lot of generals saying that Rumsfeld's a contrarian jerk.
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 07:11 PM by Old Crusoe
My guess is they know what they're talking about.

My god, even Evan Bayh, following the Abu Ghraib disclosures, confronted Rumsfeld with the point that sometimes for the good of a nation and its ideals, resignation is imperative, meaning Don Rumsfeld in this case.

Rumsfeld, at that hearing, glared back at Bayh with a look of arrogant contempt. I'll never forget it.

Time for Uncle Don to hit the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Way past time for Uncle Don to hit the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC