Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ: The Minority Maker -The clever GOP strategy for defeat in November

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:19 PM
Original message
WSJ: The Minority Maker -The clever GOP strategy for defeat in November
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008226

If Republicans lose control of Congress in November, they might want to look back at last Thursday as the day it was lost. That's when the big spenders among House Republicans blew up a deal between the leadership and rank-in-file to impose some modest spending discipline.

Unlike the collapse of the immigration bill, this fiasco can't be blamed on Senate Democrats. This one is all about Republicans and their refusal to give up their power to spend money at will and pass out "earmarks" like a bartender offering drinks on the house. The chief culprits are the House Appropriators, led by Committee Chairman Jerry Lewis of California and his 13 subcommittee chairmen known as "cardinals." If Republicans lose the House--and they are well on their way--Mr. Lewis deserves the moniker of the minority maker.

For weeks, the Republican Study Committee, a group of fiscally conservative Members, had been negotiating a spending outline with the House leadership. But when they finally struck a deal last week, Mr. Lewis refused to go along and threatened to defeat the budget on the House floor if Speaker Denny Hastert brought it up. With Democrats opposing the budget as a matter of party unity, GOP leaders gave up and left town for Easter recess without a vote on their budget blueprint for 2007.

<snip>

A category five political storm is building in GOP precincts around the country, and it is going to blow Republicans right out of the majority in November if they don't soon give their supporters some reason to re-elect them. So far this year they've passed limits on free speech that liberals love, but they haven't been able to extend the wildly successful 2003 tax cuts by even a mere two years. And now they won't even allow a vote on budget reforms that their own President and a majority of their own Members support.

At the current pace, a Democratic majority in Congress would be preferable, if only for reasons of truth in advertising.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. We will need a category 5 storm to overcome any chance....
of voter fraud.

In a fair election, the Dems could get 35 seats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Wildly successful 2003 tax cuts".....
:wtf: Wildly successful for the top 3% of Americans, yes. For everyone else it's been business as usual. :eyes:

Jerry Lewis has been nothing since he and Dean Martin split. He should stick to telethons and leave politics to those who can handle it: The Democrats! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. "wildly successful 2003 tax cuts"
wildly successful for them, of course. For the economy....not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Only the WSJ would think that THIS is the factor.

How many people give a rat's ass about wasteful spending by the Conservatives? Ronald Reagan made voodoo the official centerpiece of his '80 campaign, but anyone with at least half a brain knows the Iranian hostage situation caused the problem.

In many ways we have Iranian militants to thank for our being in Iraq right now. Carter is the only president since before Truman to attempt a major shift in US foreign policy to a less intrusive one. He negotiated the return of the Sinai to Egypt and accepted the will of the Iranian people when they ousted the Shah. So how did the Iranian militants respond? They violated the most sacred law in international diplomacy by taking over our embassy.

The result? US foreign policy became more intrusive than ever before and has remained that way even after the Cold War.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Jimmy Carter.....
he was the ONLY Democrat my dyed in the wool GOPer Mother ever liked. "He was such a good man"....but she voted for Reagan. Twice. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC