Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush, Rummy, and the Retired Generals - new cartoon!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 01:09 PM
Original message
Bush, Rummy, and the Retired Generals - new cartoon!
Bush, Rummy, and the Retired Generals - new cartoon!

This one is fresh off the grill. We just cooked it and put it up.

These are actual quotes from the retired generals.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is a great cartoon....thanks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. all 8 quotes are direct quotes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Late Slip Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. Gen. Shinseki should be in there too although
he isn't with the current crop of those speaking out against Rumsfeld. He "retired" after he gave testimony that hundreds of thousands of troops were required to do the job.

Here's an anecdote, Rumsfeld didn't even go to Shinseki's retirement function. Nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. yeah, he was the guy who stood up and really took the heat
and got treated like crap by Team Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. About Shinseki...
There is a very interesting article in this week's Newsweek (well, interesting me as retired military anyway). Gives some of the background on Shinseki as an intro to discussing the whole situation. As you can see, Shinseki took probably the most heat for speaking honestly while on active duty (worth noting when you hear the Bush-defenders talking about how the other generals should have said something before), but has been unwilling to raise his voice in criticism since.

Gen. Eric Shinseki, former chief of staff of the Army, says he is "at peace." But reached last week, he didn't sound all that peaceful. In the winter of 2003, alone among the top brass, Shinseki had warned Congress that occupying Iraq would require "several hundred thousand troops." Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and his deputy, Paul Wolfowitz, had rewarded Shinseki for his honesty by publicly castigating and shunning him.

Last fall, Shinseki went to the 40th reunion of the class of '65 at West Point. It has been reported that his classmates were wearing caps emblazoned RIC WAS RIGHT. Last week NEWSWEEK e-mailed Shinseki to ask about the reports. Shinseki called back to say he had heard "rumors" about the caps. But, NEWSWEEK asked, wasn't he there? "Well," he replied, "I saw a cap."

Shinseki, who has retired to Hawaii, was clearly uncomfortable with the role of martyr. He had no desire to join the chorus of retired generals calling for Rumsfeld's resignation. He was circumspect about criticizing Rumsfeld at all, but he seemed to be struggling to disguise his feelings. He pointedly said that the "person who should decide on the number of troops is the combatant commander"—Gen. Tommy Franks, and not Rumsfeld.

Some critics have argued that Shinseki should have banged on the table, pushed harder to stop Rumsfeld from going into Iraq with too few troops. How does Shinseki respond? "Probably that's fair. Not my style," said the old soldier, who nearly lost a foot in combat in Vietnam. There was, he added cryptically, "a lot of turmoil" at the Pentagon in the lead-up to the war. Was that Rumsfeld's fault? "Partly," said Shinseki. Did Rumsfeld bully General Franks, the overall invasion commander? "You'll have to ask Franks," said Shinseki, who indicated that he had talked long enough. "I walked away from all this two and a half years ago," he said.

The former four-star general appeared to be torn between his strong sense of duty and an uneasy conscience...

...it is fair to say that Rumsfeld's shabby treatment of Shinseki—the secretary did not bother to attend the retirement ceremony of the Army chief of staff, whose replacement was leaked 14 months before his term was up—had a chilling effect on other officers.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12335719/site/newsweek/


Neil, please see my post below about Clark. If I'd been thinking, I'd have posted it here instead. D'oh! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 03:46 PM
Original message
that's a great article! I'm glad to hear about the caps.
I'll go looking for that other post you mention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. that's a great article! I'm glad to hear about the caps.
I'll go looking for that other post you mention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack from Charlotte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #32
57. Zinni said Rumseld's failure to attend Shinseki's retirement ceremony was
"shameful." Said he'd never forget it and never forgive Rumsfeld. Heard him on a radio interview say that the other day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. Republicans are vindictive
Sometimes in the most petty ways. Sometimes a lot more.

Repub SecDef Cohen didn't attend Clark's retirement dinner either. But Shinseki did. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #57
63. Bush and Rummy don't understand there are limits to disagreeing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent job of putting this in perspective. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. How many times has Bush said "I listen to my commanders on the ground?"
Edited on Tue Apr-18-06 01:40 PM by Neil Lisst
These guys were his commanders on the ground.

But he uses 4 retired Air Force generals to counter the 6 Army and Marine generals.

So, 4 generals who have never been in charge of troops ON THE GROUND IN IRAQ are the ones who are criticizing the guys who WERE there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. This is definitely one of those deer-in-the-headlights points.
I would love for a "journalist" to put the point raised in your 'toon to Bush. It would guarantee one of his monumental pauses/deer-in-the-headlights moments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Don't you wish one journalist would ask "Why do you lie so much?!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. And we know he would "disassemble" even in answering that! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. I think he would lose it, if challenged like that.
He might even get ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heywood J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. Yes
"Why do you lie so much? Is it pathological or is it just contempt?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. Mister President, are you a demon from Hell, a spawn of Satan?
the question that is on my mind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Which begs the question - IF he really is listening to his commanders
Edited on Tue Apr-18-06 04:18 PM by calimary
on the ground, WHY is this war still being prosecuted in such a cockamamie way? Why are we still doing the wrong things? Why are we still losing? These were commanders on the ground and he clearly didn't pay much attention to what they said - if, indeed, they actually did press their case about it. It makes me wonder what kind of case they pressed? How hard did they try to get their point across - while the troops serving farther down the foodchain were being systematically fed into a meatgrinder?

Hey, Neil - I'm up, elsewhere here in GD-P.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2575613

BTW - ANOTHER terrific cartoon! K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. but he really isn't listening to them!!
he keeps voices of disagreement far away

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Sure he listens
as little as possible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. he HATES listening to anyone else!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oda Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. amazing
great work neil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. so glad you like it, oda
we have our favorites, too, and I really like this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Boy, isn't that true!
In one ear and out of the other!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
52. but he listens to his commanders on the ground!!
which is why the air force guys are the ones who still support Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. Great toon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
36. thanks and thanks for reading!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. Question... Have all of these Generals actually served on the ground in
Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I was wondering this myself today and Al or Randi said the answer was yes
They all has served in Iraq - though don't quote me on this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. some have, some haven't served on the ground in Iraq
I can't tell you which are which, but every story about them mentions their history.

here's Newbold
http://www.usmc.mil/genbios2.nsf/0/8C0F7A68BFF2272185256808006EA9AA?opendocument
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. Not all, but most
Swannack and Batiste were division commanders in Iraq. Batiste was even offered a third star and a very high position in Iraq... I think it was ground component commander, or maybe deputy in Central Command; he chose to retire instead.

Eaton was in charge of training Iraqi forces in Iraq.

Newbold was the J-3 (Joint Staff principle in charge of operations) when the decision to go to war was being made. He chose to retire rather than participate in the execution of an unnecessary war.

Zinni was in charge of Central Command before Bush took office in '01. He also served as Bush's "special envoy" to the Middle East, but mostly working the Israel/Palestine issue, I think. But I don't think he's been in Iraq, unless it was during Desert Storm. Still, he's very familiar with the situation before and after "Mission Accomplished."

Riggs was involved in providing logistical support to the force in Iraq, but I don't think he ever served in country.

About the cartoon:
I'm wondering why Wes Clark was left out--he's been calling for Rumsfeld to go since 2003. Seems to me, since we got a Democratic general who saw the need before any of the others, we ought to make some points for the Party with it. But good job otherwise!

If anyone wants to hear Clark's full explanation of what these generals are saying and why, he has a podcast called "Integrity and Dissent," out as of about two days ago. Very good for passing along to any of your friends or family who may not "get it." http://securingamerica.com/clarkcasts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. I wanted to use the 6 who were in the news right now.
Clark and a couple of others are not NEWS. This is big news, because some of these guys were commanders on the ground in Iraq under Bush. That really sets them apart.

Look at who the pres got as his primary defenders - 4 retired AIR FORCE generals. Bush has been great for the air force. They get to test all their gizmos and battle test all their people, but except for the heavy bombing periods, their roles in conflict are much more limited.

It's the Army and Marine generals who see the folly of Bush and Rummy in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. great stuff neil! K&R
Edited on Tue Apr-18-06 11:13 PM by Jeffersons Ghost
Which General said "I'm tired of burying his mistakes?"

I was promoting the sultry Hanoi Jane on the General-ly freeper ruled by neocon board and boy did I get bashed yesterday... The friggin' VA sent me some crap about re-filing to prove how fucking poor I am instead of my pain pills thanks to repuke ideas from this year and I was hurting and pissed. Good stuff Neil. thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. "I'm tired of burying his mistakes!"
I don't recall which one, but one of them did say that.

Hell, Batiste was there in 2003-2004.

These 6-7 guys are emblematic of hundreds who are thinking like them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. i bet even the neocons are finally realizing the absurdity of this killing
and it's not for freedom, it's for profit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. One of the best yet, deserves national recognition
Just using their own words.


Brilliant.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
41. thanks, that's good to hear
I keep hoping one of ours will get picked up nationally.

This one is really good, and my partner who draws all these in Canada drew this one perfect the first time. Isn't that amazing?

I love the ones like that.

I sent him about 3 photos of each general, to give him a really good feel for how they look, and to track the photos seen now in print media.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stephenharper Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
24. Bush's Blunder continues ...
... listening to the wrong sources. Even when he has good intel, he goes the other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #24
51. welcome to DU, stephen harper!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
25. right on point, as usual. . . . . . eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
43. annabanana! I thought saw you in here.
Thanks. We have cut back to 3 a week, and we're putting more into each one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
26. Hey Neil, your best one yet. Keep up the good work. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. thanks, that's great to hear!
appreciate your reading it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StaggerLee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
27. The boy king listens only to his fascist handlers
Great toon.

K&R

:dem:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
44. speaking of great tunes, Stagger Lee is one such
Edited on Wed Apr-19-06 04:11 PM by Neil Lisst
ever hear the Righteous Bros version?

Bill Medley and Bobby Hatfield.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StaggerLee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. Wow ,no!
I haven't. I didn't know there was one by them. I'm gonna have to check that out.

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. it was made famous in 1959 by ...
Edited on Wed Apr-19-06 05:44 PM by Neil Lisst
Here's the story ...

THE ST. LOUIS GLOBE DEMOCRAT, 1895: "William Lyons, 25, a levee hand, was shot in the abdomen yesterday evening at 10 o'clock in the saloon of Bill Curtis, at Eleventh and Morgan Streets, by Lee Sheldon, a carriage driver. Lyons and Sheldon were friends and were talking together. Both parties, it seems, had been drinking and were feeling in exuberant spirits. The discussion drifted to politics, and an argument was started, the conclusion of which was that Lyons snatched Sheldon's hat from his head. The latter indignantly demanded its return. Lyons refused, and Sheldon withdrew his revolver and shot Lyons in the abdomen. When his victim fell to the floor Sheldon took his hat from the hand of the wounded man and coolly walked away. He was subsequently arrested and locked up at the Chestnut Street Station. Lyons was taken to the Dispensary, where his wounds were pronounced serious. Lee Sheldon is also known as 'Stag' Lee"

FOLLOW UP: Billy Lyons died from his wounds, and Stag Lee was tried for this killing. The first trial ended in a hung jury amidst major political controversy. He was convicted in the second trial, served time, and died in the nineteen-teens.

THE SONG: This real-life incident soon became legendary in the South, and moved into song -- and down the river to New Orleans, where the killer's name became, variously, Stagolee, Stag-O-Lee, Stackolee or Stack-A-Lee. The latter was the spelling on one of the earliest recorded versions by Frank Hutchison in 1927, and on a Top 10 R&B hit in 1950 performed in two parts by a New Orleans singer in the Professor Longhair style.

Born Leon T. Gross, he was known professionally as Archibald (and sometimes as Archie Boy). His musical re-telling of the story might have been the end of the line chart-wise for old Stag, if it weren't for the Korean War.


http://www.bobshannon.com/stories/Stagger.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StaggerLee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #49
54. Americana at it's finest!
Thanks for the link. I can never get enough background on the legend itself.
I had not idea that the the Lloyd Price version was originally a flip-side. Neat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
37. One question and I know this will be brought up:
Were these statements made before retirement?

Bush says he listens to his commanders on the ground. If they are retired, they are not on the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. they were said AFTER retirement
However, they say they gave similar advice inside, but that Rummy was very unfriendly to anything but his own ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Ah. I heard (from Rushbo so not sure if accurate) that the Code of
Military Justice/Conduct (not sure which word goes there) forbids such questioning while in the service.

If that premise is true: They didn't say it, did and shouldn't have (the Right will call for heads) or did when not "on the ground."

Thoughts? I just know this is how the scenario will go down so we might as well hash it out to its end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. UCMJ - Uniform Code of Military Justice
And that's right. If you are active duty and you speak out against the chain of command above you, you can be drummed out for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Thanks for the information. Quick research: Is it Subchapter X, § 888,
Art. 88?:

CONTEMPT TOWARD OFFICIALS

Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

If so, what is the appropriate definition of "contemptuous?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. it's anything they say it is!!
contemptuous, that is

imagine a jury of 2/3 officers and 1/3 enlisted, and you're enlisted ...

Military Justice is an oxymoron. There ain't no justice in military justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #42
53. They can submit military advice, not that it was listened to ...
The Pentagon was filled with officers advising on things like troop levels needed before going into Iraq and the advice was ignored. The PNACers started getting all huffy about the civilian administration having precedence over military authority.

If an officer was thought to be unsound that said officer was found other duties. The result was officers could shut up or put up. Little wonder there are so many PO'd Generals gunning for Rummy now.

Even now preferment is more a case of how well you can brown-nose the administration and indulge in groupthink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
38. Good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #38
50. thanks, 0007. I'll use this to kick it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #50
55. Hi Neil...
Do you remember posting some of the words to I AM A ROCK on my anti-war vigil thread yesterday? I DO REQUESTS! Check it out: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2579239
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. yes, I remember it
Edited on Thu Apr-20-06 02:08 PM by Neil Lisst
how about this

In the clearing stands a boxer
And a fighter by his trade
And he carries the reminders
Of ev'ry glove that layed him down
Or cut him till he cried out
In his anger and his shame
"I am leaving, I am leaving"
But the fighter still remains
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
56. Wow! Very effective..... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. thanks, we're working on a fresh one to be up in 6 hours
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
61. Well, that just about sums things up. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. thanks, we're working on one to insert into the line up ...
about the Decider!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC