Louisana law at the time allowed for the regulation of the
carrying of weapons under very strict circumstances if a particular set of procedures was followed. No such procedures were followed, and the Feds and deputized out-of-staters were barging into people's HOMES without search warrants, cuffing the occupants in the street, and ransacking their homes for guns. The officers doing that committed too many felonies to count.
A Federal judge issued a restraining order against the illegal confiscations and ordered the city to return the stolen guns, a move that was widely cheered here on DU if you were following the issue at the time. Louisiana is in the process of repealing the misunderstood statute in question:
http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/capital/index.ssf?/base/news-3/114473745211400.xmlhttp://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x123757Even if you don't particularly care for the Second Amendment, one would think you'd at least be concerned about the Fourth. Do you see a hurricane exemption clause to the Bill of Rights?
The view that the Bill of Rights can be suspended during an emergency is
exactly the view of the Bush administration on the warrantless wiretap issue. I vehemently disagree with that view, and I certainly hope most DU'ers would as well--whether the excuse is terrorism or a hurricane.