Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Before the Chimp claimed the title - Who was the worse president ever!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 10:55 PM
Original message
Before the Chimp claimed the title - Who was the worse president ever!
Rolling Stones sums it up pretty well that Bush Jr. will probably go down as the worst president EVER. Can't say there's much of a disagreement with that one (although I'll always think of Reagan as worse for personal reasons).

Anyhow, before Bush Jr claimed the title of "Worse President Ever" who was the "Worst President Ever" and why.

I'd have to go with Reagan and he would be almost neck-n-neck with the chimp mainly because of his social spending cuts and massive military spending put us in the position of debt that we have today. Plus if Reagan had never gotten elected, I highly doubt that Poppy Bush would have ever been president and without a doubt the idiot would have never even run for governor. Junior was nothing more than a figurehead with a name that could pick up where things got interrupted when Clinton won in 1992.

So who is your title for WORST PRESIDENT EVER BEFORE BUSH JR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Like father like son
Nobody even comes close to Junior. He's in a class by himself, although his old man would have to be in the running.

Just the fact that Poppy Bush conceived Junior is enough for him to get first runner up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FudgeBudgie Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. It saddens me
everytime I see the anticipation of another terrorist attack as a political vehicle, for us or the the administration/Republicans.

"Barring a cataclysmic event on the order of the terrorist attacks of September 11th" ...

This belittles humanity. Are we only moved by horror? Is every extremist action a conservative political tool?

The security of this nation, and indeed the world, is a noble goal, so why must potential future terrorist acts be hedged as Repug chicanery?

Beware your insensitivity, for it bares a most troubling cynicism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. What's that gotta do with Bush being the most pathetic fuckup ever?
Edited on Wed Apr-19-06 11:14 PM by mtnsnake
and his old man, too?

edited to add their ignorant wives, also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. FudgeBudgie, welcome to DU.
I stand guilty as charged on the cynicism, but remember, the most cynical people are often the most idealistic, the ones most loyal to romantic, lyrical constructs.

We aren't cynical on DU about the office of the president, but rather the current inhabitant of that office. It's the people's office and he has betrayed that spirit and conducted himself in manners most of us find appalling and repellent.

We seek a better world and we're cynical because it's the only mechanicsm we have for keeping cool-browed when someone like George W. Bush is given power.

As I say, welcome to DU, and I'll look forward to your posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Hi FudgeBudgie!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gotta be Harding....
The Teapot Dome scandal "rocked the Warren G. Harding administration".

Funny that it happened in Wyoming.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Reagan was absolutely appalling in a variety of ways, and Nixon set
Edited on Wed Apr-19-06 11:14 PM by Old Crusoe
the standard for furtive betrayals of the public trust.

But I wouldn't rule out Harding, whose wife might even have killed him (http://www.anythingarkansas.com/arkapedia/pedia/Warren_Harding/), or even James Buchanan, the president just before Lincoln.

Rutherford B. Hayes, like Dubya, cheated a Democrat (Tilden) to win office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Like Mt. Everest and a mole hill: Bush #1, everyone else #2.
The scale for bush is so large that we can't tell the difference between the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Buchanan
Many historians have said his administration was the most corrup[t and inept in US History. I've also read that the poor job he did while president helped to cause the Civil War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. My vote goes to Hoover. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm not historically-studied enough to decide.
He's absolutely the worst in my lifetime. It'd take some expertise to know who even comes close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Since he's serving two terms, can't he be #1 and #2?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. Warren Harding
Hoover is close behind..

but here is good link:

http://www.infoplease.com/spot/presrankings1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC