|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:26 PM Original message |
I don't see how 1 can make a case that Kerry is more electable than Clark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
1. I think people are concerned as much about domestic issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Have you SEEN Clark in a long, one-on-one format? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EXE619K (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
17. Exact reason why Clark is not my #1 pick..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crewleader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 01:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
28. Clark has experience on domestic issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EXE619K (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 01:33 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Please see below...post #26 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crewleader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:53 PM Response to Reply #29 |
43. I've heard this from Gert's own words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John_H (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. That's obviously not true. They have NO means to attack Clark. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. I think both are electable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. I do too, but one signifigantly more than the other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
4. They will attack Kerry's voting record. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. If Bush wins against Kerry... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:55 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. That's the biggest story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 01:02 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. what makes my think Clark is anybody elses first choice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 01:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
21. Clark was fired and you say Rove has no ammo???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 01:04 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Saving a people from ethnic cleansing without a SINGLE American casualty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 01:33 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. No, what's silly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 01:39 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. I agree with almost everything you said, other that what you said I SAID |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 01:46 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Wrong post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:23 PM Response to Reply #30 |
40. What's going to stick in people's minds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KingofSwords (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
5. Here's why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lefta Dissenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Once we have our nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:43 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. could you be more vague? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democratreformed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I'm glad I'm not the only one who didn't understand this post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feanorcurufinwe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
6. Why try? The voters are doing it for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:44 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. the "electable in a primary=electable in a general" argument was empty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feanorcurufinwe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 01:35 PM Response to Reply #13 |
31. Calling an argument empty does not refute it, it avoids it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 01:41 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Would McCain have been a weaker candidate than Bush? No he would've |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feanorcurufinwe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:24 PM Response to Reply #35 |
41. You are talking about Republicans in 2000. This is about Dems in 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 04:53 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. and what better example do you have for YOUR contention? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lefta Dissenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
9. oops, this is really a reply to #1, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EXE619K (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 01:07 PM Response to Reply #9 |
26. I've mentioned this before.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hilzoy (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 01:38 PM Response to Reply #26 |
33. He wasn't always SACEUR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EXE619K (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 01:49 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. yes, I'm aware of how Clark "came up through ranks". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
12. You can't, because "electability" is a hoax. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:50 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. That is rediculous. Political science is taken seriously by serious people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 01:15 PM Response to Reply #16 |
27. Not ridiculous in this situation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 01:48 PM Response to Reply #27 |
37. how about all of the congressional candidates that Roved handpicked in 02 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
18. What about the voter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woofless (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
20. It's pretty simple. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 01:06 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. What? In a democratic primary? There's no way to argue rationally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
24. I think the "outsider" thing is hurting both Clark and Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strelnikov_ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 01:37 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. Well Said, But I also Think It Is Due To The Compressed Schedule |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:36 PM Response to Reply #32 |
42. the compressed schedule definitely helps the front runner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
39. He's not convincing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 04:37 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. There's no more evidence to support Clark "coming up with a belief system" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 05:16 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. It's my personal impression |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
46. bump |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC