Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blumenthal, Salon: "The president doesn't care that he is reviled..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 07:33 PM
Original message
Blumenthal, Salon: "The president doesn't care that he is reviled..."
The passion of George W. Bush

The president doesn't care that he is reviled. He is a martyr, and someday all will see his glory. Meanwhile, he's got Karl doing his dirty work.

By Sidney Blumenthal

http://www.salon.com/opinion/blumenthal/2006/04/27/rove_bush/



April 27, 2006 | The urgent dispatch of Karl Rove to the business of maintaining one-party rule in the midterm elections is the Bush White House's belated startle reflex to its endangerment. Besieged by crises of his own making, plummeting to ever lower depths in the polls week after week, Bush has assigned his political general to muster dwindling forces for a heroic offensive to break out of the closing ring. If the Democrats gain control of the House or Senate they will launch a thousand subpoenas to establish the oversight that has been abdicated by the Republican Congress.

In his acceptance speech before the Republican National Convention in 2004, the "war president" spoke of "greatness" and "resolve" and repeatedly promised "a safer world" and "security," and compared himself "to a resolute president named Truman." Afterward, Bush declared he had had his "accountability moment"; further debate was unnecessary; the future was settled.

But Rove's elaborate design for Republican rule during the second term has collapsed under the strain of his grandiosity. In 2004, Rove galvanized "the base" (ironically, "al-Qaida" in Arabic) through ruthless divide-and-conquer and slash-and-burn tactics. But with Bush winning the election by a bare 50.73 percent, he failed to forge the unassailable Republican realignment that he sought.

Rove is an amateur historian whose goal was modeled on the apparently unlikely figure of President William McKinley. Bush's radicalism bears little resemblance to McKinley's stalwart conservatism except for his friendly orientation toward big business. Rove zeroed in on McKinley because his election in 1896 created a natural Republican presidential majority that was broken only by the party split of 1912, when Theodore Roosevelt ran as a Progressive and when Franklin D. Roosevelt ushered in a Democratic realignment in 1932. Rove and Bush had hoped to use the second term to force radical changes that would alter American government, society and politics. At last, they planned to undo the New Deal and return to the Republican Eden. But Rove's proposal for the privatization of Social Security, among other schemes, was aborted without even a single congressional hearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. If Rove was using Billy McKinley as a model
it would have behooved him to know that said gentleman actually fought in the Civil War-he was a cook at one point, and during a seige ran to the front lines to give his men sandwiches to eat. Sure beats hiding out at the dentists to get out of going to war. And McKinley was truly compassionate-his wife had epilepsy, and he tried to shield and protect her from prying eyes. I believe some of his last words were for someone to look after her. Of course, McKinley loved Big Business, and if he hadn't been assassinated in Buffalo, it is likely he would have continued the practice of giving Big Business whatever it wanted. In that way, the two men could be said to be alike.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. I didn't know that about McKinley
Guess I think higher than him now than I used to. Although I still think it would've been cool if Bryan had been elected President. Big business would've been scared shitless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chomp Donating Member (602 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent. Kick. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hey, Robots Don't Have Feelings! When You Have A Key
inserted in your back and have to be wound up every morning, it's pretty hard to feel much else!

This JOKE we have in the WH has been selling his soul since he knew how to say BUSH! He came cheap, all he wanted was to have his name at the top, the rest was simply left to his "handlers!"

How many "frat boy" movies have you watched? Hopefully, and I have been hoping for far too long, in time they key will fall off and get lost. Then those who did the winding will have to spend most of their time looking for the LOST KEY!

Ya know, ya dance with who brung ya! Or maybe we can march Colin Powell out again with his Pottery Barn analogy! AAAHHH, the dreams I dream!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. I bet that pissy
ego of his does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. I disagree with a number of things in this posted segment of
Edited on Thu Apr-27-06 09:03 PM by Peace Patriot
Blumenthal's article.

1. That Rove being put in charge of Congressional elections was "the Bush White House"'s "startle reflex" to its endangerment. Rove was demoted, and the reason is either, a) that he is about to be indicted in Treasongate, or b) he is ratting out others in the WH on Treasongate to avoid his own indictment. Rove is on the way out, of necessity--due to crimes committed by the junta. Putting him in charge of the '06 campaigns was just Bush-Cheney's final insult to the real rank and file Republican Party, and to the country.

2. "In 2004, Rove galvanized 'the base' ...through ruthless divide-and-conquer and slash-and-burn tactics." Prove it. Show me the ballots. Tell me how they were counted. Show me the new voter registration data. This is Rove's and Cheney's line, that they "galvanized the base." I think it is untrue. And I think the evidence that it is untrue is much more compelling that the evidence that it is true. In truth, there is NO evidence that it is true--zero, zilch data, showing that Bush's "base" was "galvanized." (For instance, the Dems blew the Repubs away in new voter registration in 2004, nearly 60/40. How is that a "galvanization" of Bush's base?)

3. "...with Bush winning the election...". Prove it. Show me the ballots. Tell me how they were counted. As with Bush "galvanizing" the base, the evidence that Bush didn't win is much more compelling than the evidence that he did, and the whole issue is steeped in the egregious non-transparency of the election system, achieved by Bushite voting machine companies during the 2002-2004 period, with the installation of new electronic voting technology run on "TRADE SECRET," PROPRIETARY programming code with virtually no audit/recount controls--a transformation of our election system wrought by the $4 billion boondoggle called the "Help America Vote Act" --a bill that was pushed through by the two biggest crooks in Congress, Tom Delay and Bob Ney.

4. "Rove's elaborate design for Republican rule during the second term has collapsed under the strain of his grandiosity." No, it has not collapsed of grandiosity. First of all, it is not yet clear that it has collapsed. Fascist powers and policies are still in place, perhaps the most insidious of them being the plague Diebold/ES&S voting machines in virtually every state--highly insecure, unreliable and hackable voting machines and central tabulators, controlled by corporations with close ties to the Republican Party and extreme rightwing causes, and, furthermore, newly devised, entrenched corruption in the election theft industry that involves both Democratic and Republican election officials and legislators. (Not easy to get rid.) The word "collapses" also implies that Roves' design for Republican rule had significant support to begin with. I don't think it ever did. I think Americans do suffer from the illusion of support for Bush--created by the war profiteering corporate news monopolies, rigged elections, and silent, ineffective Democratic leaders--but if you have followed both the issue and approval polls over the last 2-3 years, what you find is overwhelming disapproval among Americans, way up in the 60% to 70% range, on every major Bush policy, foreign and domestic. What is "collapsing" is the illusion--for which I credit the internet, and also the goodness, the basic desire for peace and justice, and the general, widespread progressive values of the American people, who have stalwartly resisted the 24/7 warmongering and fearmongering to which they have been subjected. Rove is a liar. So are Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and the whole gang of criminals that have seized control of our government. THAT is why this illusion of support for them is collapsing. It was based on a "house of cards" of lies and deceit--INCLUDING the deceit of rigged elections and control of the lapdog press. "Grandiosity" may have something to do with it--in the sense that they have overreached on fascist control, and have caused revulsion even in the military and intelligence communities, and among other very establishment-type Americans. But Americans have never supported ANY of the Bush program.

I have never bought the notion that Rove is a "genius" or is even talented. It doesn't take a lot of talent to write press releases for foregone conclusions. What the Bush junta is about is foregone conclusions--the total manipulation of all the mechanisms of power, and then management of the newsstream to create a feasible narrative for their rigged game--whether it's war, or deregulation, or "winning" an election. When you examine what people like Rove and Cheney said about the election, for instance--items like their "invisible" get out the vote campaign--it's just laughable. I think that is the sole reason that they ran the anti-gay marriage initiatives in several key states--not to win votes, but to have something to say afterwards, about why they "won."

In any case, I have great impatience with these political philosophers, who go on in these generalities regarding Bush/Cheney/Rove's actions or policies, successes or failures, without looking at the actual mechanisms of power--such as the voting system itself--which they have quite deliberately and consciously re-made to their purpose.

These criminals are power-mongers, and what we, the people, need to do is power-monger them right back, restore transparency and public control of our election system, and throw them out. Power is the issue. Not vagaries like Rove's "grandiosity."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Well said
If you don't mind, I'd like to send your post to Blumenthal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saberjet22 Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. what you said
Thank you for a brilliant dissection of a slippery subject. Needless to say, I agree with you wholeheartedly. Now if we could just get this message into the heads of the Bush supporters, all would be well. Unfortunately, they are ineducable, else why would he have 30% of the voters still supporting him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. I agree with you. Too bad Salon doesn't have a comments feature.
Or if it does I didn't see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Salon does allow comments,
but they are like letters to the editor. Only some are used. I have had a couple of comments on Salon articles posted on Salon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. In that case, that post would make a good ltte to Salon. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
23. Great Post, Put It On It's Own Thread!
Edited on Sat Apr-29-06 08:26 AM by Beetwasher
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeNearMcChord Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-27-06 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think the GOP would, since it's their
backsides on the line, in November. If he has that kind've of F*** it attitude, then maybe they should implement impeachment. Nahh they are Kool-aid drinkers ready to go down the Titanic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. He doesn't care if he is reviled because he has no respect for
the American public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. how much longer
are we going to take this frat boy's BS, inquiring minds what to know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. * reviles America..so the feeling's mutual..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 09:13 AM
Original message
You forgot to mention that the WHOLE WORLD reviles Bush* n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
9.  dupe sorry
Edited on Fri Apr-28-06 09:14 AM by Auntie Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Notoverit Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. Pssst! Sydney! Bush didn't win in 2004! Pass it on!
It's sad when intelligent people who should know better prove to be duped by the Bush's media?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. From now on I will refer to "the base" as al-qaida
because the Blumenthal is right, the irony is rich. But the irony is also 100% valid in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. That was my favorite part of the article!
I think we should all start referring to the much-ballyhooed repukelican "base" as "al quaeda".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. "Oderint dum metuant" - Let them hate, provided they fear.
- attributed to Caligula.

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Very good one! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
18. St. George?
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC