Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Energy Secretary: Soaring gas prices could last THREE MORE YEARS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 03:58 PM
Original message
Bush Energy Secretary: Soaring gas prices could last THREE MORE YEARS
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12531620/

Gasoline prices have soared an average of 60 cents a gallon in less than a month because suppliers are unable to keep up with demand, a situation that could persist up to three more years, Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman said Sunday. Bodman said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that the shortfall was a sign of a stronger economy under President Bush, but he acknowledged that, at least for now, “the suppliers have lost control of the market.”

“The oil has gone up because the suppliers are unable to make the flows equal to the demand,” he said. “... Clearly, it’s going to be a number of years, maybe two to three years, before suppliers are going to be able to keep up with those demands.”

Bodman blamed demand from China and India, reduced refining capacity after Hurricane Katrina, and inadequate planning for shifts to cleaner fuels like ethanol and low-sulfur diesel for causing market “dislocations” that led to rising prices, but Red Cavaney, president of the American Petroleum Institute, the industry trade group, said the war in Iraq played a major role, too.

U.S. companies have been unable to provide the Iraqis with technical assistance to revive their oil industry because “we make sure that we don’t put our employees in harm’s way,” he said. “As soon as you can stabilize the situation in Iraq, they can ramp up production, but it’s going to take years.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. "the shortfall was a sign of a stronger economy under President Bush"
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. yes, stronger economy
in india and china, that is....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. A lot of people seem to be "losing control" in this "stronger
economy under *!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The more control these guys lose, the richer they get. Nice for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Only in BushWorld is incompetence lavishly rewarded. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yep, for as long as the Evil Moron is in the White House
What a coincidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think there's a simple reason for this; these guys know alternative
energy is just around the corner and they are going to get as much as they can before that happens. It me, there just doesn't seem to be any other answer, since they are making billions in profits right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I hope you're right on that, and that they can't find a way to make it
their next high profit commodity. They're working hard on making sure hydro is owned by them. I expect we'll soon have private water. When they're done wrecking the environment we'll have to pay for air, the regular stuff won't be breathable without becoming terribly ill -- like regular rain, river and ground water is now. Huge investments in KY for those who can afford it would be wise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jayhawk Lib Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. The best way to keep alternative
energy off the market is make oil and gas cheaper not higher. When alternative energy, what ever it might be, is developed it will come from the private sector not the government sector.

Lower energy prices will not encourage development of alternative forms of energy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ecumenist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. I suppose that period of time just HAPPENS to coincide with what
what may be the rest of his pResidency or is it just me? :eyes: Does anyone else notice this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeNearMcChord Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. I guess it means for the Republicans
that they may face 1932 all over again,kissing oil company backside while kicking Joe Lunch-bucket's. Enjoy that long stay out of power, who knows maybe in the next century. That first GOP president elected since 2004, may be a Gay part Black, part Latino agnostic.:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Does that translate into three more years of BigOil profiteering?
Never mind. I know the answer to my question. We are being steam-rolled by the Bu$hco/BigOil Windfall Profit Express. What Enron did to California is chicken-shit compared to what Bu$h/Cheney and BigOil are doing to the country. And they are laughing out loud in our faces.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. He's full-o-shit they aren't going to last 3 years
They're gonna last forfuckinever, dipshit, or at least til the oil runs out. The less oil they have to sell the higher the unit price has to be or their profits will take a dump and their stockholders will be pissed. The CEO's might have to take a pay cut and retire with only $200 million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC