|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
dolstein
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:27 PM Original message |
Sharpton and Kucinich should be excluded from debates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
1. as I put on my flame-retardant suit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. You will get jumped all over, but you're absolutely right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:31 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. 3 Guys Agreeing With Each Other is NOT a Real Debate (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DjTj
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:57 PM Response to Reply #7 |
42. When there's only 3 or 4 of them... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. Joke candidates? Kucinich nailed the WMD issue from the start. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngred
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:37 PM Response to Reply #2 |
19. joke candidates? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:39 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. why is appearing on The Advocate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngred
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:42 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. that was added for dramatic effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:45 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. ah.. gotcha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngred
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:48 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. LaRouche is a DINO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:00 PM Response to Reply #38 |
45. it is YOUR judgment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngred
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:06 PM Response to Reply #45 |
50. this is true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:09 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. My personal feeling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngred
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:20 PM Response to Reply #53 |
64. How much more time do you want? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:25 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. I have given them a chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. Asbestos suit, gloves, mask and shoes - check. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. D.A.D. Strikes Back!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
5. KUCINICH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
6. Nope. I want them in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KissMyAsscroft
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
8. They have had plenty of time to have their say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngred
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
28. where and when exactly? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
9. yes, i must also agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngred
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:44 PM Response to Reply #9 |
34. oh really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youngred
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
11. Hardly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YNGW
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
12. Let em stay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genius
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
13. Let's let the Republicans take over the debates. Exclude Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genius
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:36 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Kucinich has a better shot at being the nominee than Dean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:38 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. that's bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopthegop
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:39 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. "anyone who wants to exclude him is a racist" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genius
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:46 PM Response to Reply #23 |
36. Sharpton is the only representative of the African-American community |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:48 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopthegop
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:49 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. or people who realize neither has any chance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genius
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:17 PM Response to Reply #39 |
61. Kucinich will likely be the nominee from a brokered convention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:28 PM Response to Reply #61 |
69. I guarantee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
twilight
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 01:05 PM Response to Reply #61 |
92. I agree and DK said that himself! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:00 PM Response to Reply #36 |
46. He's the only African-American -- that's not the same thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 09:52 AM Response to Reply #36 |
89. Too Bad He's There Representing the Republican Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kixot
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
14. Getting my asbestos jacket on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
messiah
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
15. Now I know why voted for the Green party last election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:42 PM Response to Reply #15 |
29. they seem to understand nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastknowngood
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
16. Just Sharpton now that he has been outed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
messiah
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:38 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. Republican no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lcordero
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
17. Kucinich, Sharpton, and very recently, Clark seem to be the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truizm
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
20. :/ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:42 PM Response to Reply #20 |
31. Maybe the Democrats, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
25. why is getting a clean shot at Kerry so important? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
26. I could do without Sharpton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terwilliger
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
27. You're right, dolstein |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
32. how....'democratic'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:49 PM Response to Reply #32 |
40. sigh.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:00 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. If they are on the ballot,then yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:04 PM Response to Reply #40 |
48. Grrrr. Enough with the LaRouche comparisons already!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paulie
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:14 PM Response to Reply #48 |
58. LaRouche is also a CONVICTED felon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
33. If Sharpton gets delegates in SC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
41. Silly me, I thought the purpose of the debates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
43. Good heavens, dolstein |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:03 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. we make that decision all the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:06 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. See my post #48 for what I think about that La Rouche crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:17 PM Response to Reply #51 |
62. sorry... didn't mean to anger you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:08 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. Is Clark going to be on the other side of that line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:10 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. Very likely yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:12 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. No, no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:15 PM Response to Reply #56 |
60. there's a difference between |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
49. Dolstein: You Supported the Iraqi Invasion & Sharpton & Kucinich Didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:19 PM Response to Reply #49 |
63. And they've had plenty of opporunities to make their positions known |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:37 PM Response to Reply #63 |
76. Nothing to Do With My Helpful Post to You. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:41 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. David Zephyr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:48 PM Response to Reply #77 |
79. Heads up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 08:18 PM Response to Reply #77 |
85. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 08:22 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. I agree with part of it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
54. "I just can't justify giving equal time to ... Sharpton and Kucinich" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
57. As more candidates dropout, others will have more time in future debates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
59. As long as they are in the race |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greendog
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
65. I'm with you, Dolstein... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:27 PM Response to Reply #65 |
67. I don't think Dolstein |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
68. Ha ha ha Sharpton is ahead of Clark and Dean in SC! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:30 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. do you maintain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:32 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. No I maintain that he has every right to debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:35 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. the point of the comparison |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:48 PM Response to Reply #73 |
80. I'm not accusing anyone of being DLC..that's where the debates have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 08:10 PM Response to Reply #71 |
84. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:53 PM Response to Reply #70 |
81. You're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:57 PM Response to Reply #81 |
82. as I've said elsewhere here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 08:09 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. Well now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Sushi Bandit
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
72. I REFUSE TO GET INTO A BATTLE OF WITS WITH AN "UNARMED" MAN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:36 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. why not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinanator
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 09:47 AM Response to Reply #72 |
88. should be plenty of those coming out of Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinanator
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
74. what debates? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shoopnyc123
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
78. A Party platform is determined at the convention... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BruinAlum
![]() |
Tue Feb-03-04 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
87. A couple points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
90. Sounds like media spin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
91. Tell me again the story of the Great Big Tent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dutch
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 01:23 PM Response to Reply #91 |
93. Yes, but obviously the "big tent" has to exclude "joke" candidates... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 01:48 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. It's recruitment for the Green Party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:24 PM Response to Reply #94 |
97. It's very effective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
afraid_of_the_dark
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
95. What's wrong with a few other opinions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
96. Fortunately you don't get to decide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
98. this should be interesting....ouch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC