Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Article: Rigged Election Possible ? ... posted from another forum

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
eyeswideopened Donating Member (159 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 10:57 PM
Original message
Article: Rigged Election Possible ? ... posted from another forum
Edited on Tue Feb-03-04 11:02 PM by eyeswideopened
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/sv/riggedelectioncalled...
http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/7849117.htm

Rigged election called possible
Sun Feb 1, 5:47 AM ET

By Elise Ackerman, Mercury News

Could someone hack an election?

Yes, according to a report presented to the Maryland Legislature Thursday by Raba Technologies, a consulting firm. Maryland hired Raba's computer scientists to hack into its Diebold electronic voting system. The researchers found that software vulnerabilities could allow a saboteur to vote multiple times or tamper with computer code to steal an election.

"The team was able to demonstrate the ability to switch two candidates," the Raba scientists warned legislators. "Consequently, the voter appeared to vote for the candidate of his choice but he actually voted for another candidate."

System defended Nevertheless, Diebold marketing director Mark Radke claimed in an interview that the Raba researchers "found the system to be very secure." Voters, he said, can be confident their ballots will be counted correctly.


-snip-

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. False security
From what I understand, the Diebold and ESS systems are based on Microsoft's SQL Server 7.0. The primary hack would come through the database itself, not the front end; though no doubt a front-end hack would be fairly easy to do.

In spite of the Microsoft bashers, I think that every data-only system is vulnerable to hacking. The way to handle electronic voting is to produce copies of the vote -- one for the voter, and one for the district to verify against the machine. This way, there would be two systems of redundancy; such a system could also be implemented over the internet with the "receipt" being mailed to the voter.

The only system that would possiblly be more secure would be a public-key system, but that would require all voters to have a public key. In other words, mandatory computer use. That would not go over very well.

I'm sure Bev Harris has addressed all these issues by now. But the fact is that if the 2004 election can be hacked, it will be hacked. The stakes are high -- so are the rewards.

--bkl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC