|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Eloriel
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 01:48 AM Original message |
Dean Supporters -- URGENT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 01:54 AM Response to Original message |
1. You have got to be kidding me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mb7588a
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 01:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. You forgot all the pigs of Iowa flying about... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KeepItReal
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:05 AM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Those "expensive recounts" would've gotten Al Gore the Presidency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mb7588a
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:09 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Unfortuantely, right now it matters only for future elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:08 AM Response to Reply #1 |
14. One Democratic value "election" 2000 should have instilled in us: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
105. Warning: My man lost. There must be a CONSPIRACY afoot! MUST be! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudnclear
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 08:50 AM Response to Reply #1 |
114. Even so, Dean is second with delegates....don't give up!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rumguy
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 01:55 AM Response to Original message |
2. I admire your dedication - but come on now - don't tarnish the whole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy_Stephenson
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:03 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Really??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rumguy
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:06 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. alright then, Kerry stole the election.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy_Stephenson
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:10 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Did I say Kerry stole the election??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rumguy
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:13 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. alright then, as long as you don't attack Kerry using some kinda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:46 AM Response to Reply #17 |
29. I didn't actually know that -- thanks for that info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy_Stephenson
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:57 AM Response to Reply #29 |
80. Please do! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:09 AM Response to Reply #2 |
16. "Election" 2000 tarnished the whole process. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rumguy
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:12 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. it tarnished the Bush presidency - and has nothing, absolutely nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:32 AM Response to Reply #19 |
25. I don't know if there's anything to the suspicion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:58 AM Response to Reply #2 |
32. LOL!** Says YOU??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:00 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. If nominated John Kerry plans to challenge the paperless ballots in court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:03 AM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Great. What if he isn't nominated? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:05 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:13 AM Response to Reply #39 |
43. Could you rephrase that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:19 AM Response to Reply #2 |
65. "Tarnish the whole process"?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:22 AM Response to Reply #65 |
66. But there is absolutely no evidence of voter fraud... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:44 AM Response to Reply #66 |
74. Lucky for us in NH Dookus** There IS evidence of Voter fraud.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:46 AM Response to Reply #74 |
75. I'll keep asking... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:52 AM Response to Reply #74 |
77. No Evidence Whatever, Fellow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:50 AM Response to Reply #66 |
76. Can you impeach this statement of Eloriel's, then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:56 AM Response to Reply #76 |
79. No, it really isn't evidence of that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:11 AM Response to Reply #79 |
89. You're assuming your conclusion! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:14 AM Response to Reply #89 |
92. read the other threads on the subject |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:17 AM Response to Reply #89 |
95. If, Ma'am |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:24 AM Response to Reply #89 |
98. (this is a reply to both Dookus and Magistrate) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:27 AM Response to Reply #98 |
100. yes, that is what I believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:32 AM Response to Reply #100 |
102. Fair enough. If Eloriel gives evidence of significance, would you agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:34 AM Response to Reply #102 |
104. absolutely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:59 AM Response to Reply #104 |
106. Well, I'll let someone whose stats courses are more recent than mine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nazgul35
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 09:17 AM Response to Reply #79 |
117. which is why you would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:59 AM Response to Reply #76 |
81. Easily Impeachable, Ma'am |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:18 AM Response to Reply #81 |
97. Eloriel is claiming a statistically-significant difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:33 AM Response to Reply #97 |
103. It Would Seem So, Ma'am |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bushwakker
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 01:59 AM Response to Original message |
4. I respect your passion and commitment to Gov Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:00 AM Response to Reply #4 |
34. Deleted message |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:04 AM Response to Reply #34 |
38. what facts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:19 AM Response to Reply #38 |
45. Indeed, Sir |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:51 AM Response to Reply #45 |
51. Oh thy Magistrate, thou art so profoundeth......NOT**** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:54 AM Response to Reply #51 |
53. WHAT is so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:57 AM Response to Reply #51 |
54. What Are You Living With, Fellow? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:20 AM Response to Reply #38 |
47. Deleted message |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:23 AM Response to Reply #47 |
49. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:57 AM Response to Reply #49 |
55. Deleted message |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:58 AM Response to Reply #55 |
56. No shance.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:02 AM Response to Reply #55 |
57. There Is No Proof At All, Fellow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tobinov
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:00 AM Response to Original message |
5. I have to agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:10 AM Response to Reply #5 |
18. Remember 2000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:02 AM Response to Original message |
6. The law's not on our side Eloriel... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:02 AM Response to Reply #6 |
36. What does that cowardice reply mean? Sit back and enjoy it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
D G
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:08 AM Response to Reply #36 |
40. "Cowardice" is a pretty strong accusation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:16 AM Response to Reply #40 |
44. I will take the truth over pragmatism any day DG**** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:19 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. sorry to break it to you.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:11 AM Response to Reply #46 |
62. So you must be following mainstream media...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:15 AM Response to Reply #62 |
64. I'll keep asking... but you seem to not want to answer: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoveTurnedHawk
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:02 AM Response to Original message |
7. Par for the Course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:08 AM Response to Reply #7 |
41. Deleted message |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:54 AM Response to Reply #41 |
52. 'The Potential Of Truth', Sir? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:03 AM Response to Reply #52 |
59. Deleted message |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:08 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. rather than attack someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:14 AM Response to Reply #59 |
63. In Fact, Fellow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:22 AM Response to Reply #63 |
67. Where do you come up with this drama Shakespeare? Whos the saint? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:26 AM Response to Reply #67 |
68. It Is A Profile Common Enough, Fellow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:38 AM Response to Reply #68 |
71. Your generalizations are safe...truth however is courageous and fearless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:43 AM Response to Reply #71 |
73. Mere Blatherskite, Fellow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedda_foil
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:04 AM Response to Original message |
9. I posted it, El. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:05 AM Response to Original message |
10. I'm with you, Eloriel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BruinAlum
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:07 AM Response to Original message |
13. It comes across as an incredibly sore loser reaction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 08:12 AM Response to Reply #13 |
111. What's the point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:17 AM Response to Original message |
21. Thanks Eloriel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foo_bar
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:19 AM Response to Original message |
22. I guess anything's possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frustrated_lefty
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:27 AM Response to Original message |
23. posted on DFA n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:30 AM Response to Original message |
24. Exit polls are always flawed and wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 08:15 AM Response to Reply #24 |
112. From reasons for war to defense of DREs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KFC
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:39 AM Response to Original message |
26. Holy shit! Discrepancies between pre-election polls and actual results?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:40 AM Response to Original message |
27. Jolly well should be urgent for non-Dean supporters too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:44 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. what crap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:55 AM Response to Reply #28 |
31. I just watched some of these voters they disregard as discrepancies, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:22 AM Response to Reply #31 |
48. Unfortunately, Mr. Tree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Desertrose
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 02:54 AM Response to Original message |
30. Just be careful it doesn't sound whiney or like sour grapes.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:11 AM Response to Reply #30 |
42. We cant afford the luxury of being 'careful' anymore.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dover
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:42 AM Response to Reply #30 |
50. I agree. Be cautious. But this is a great opportunity to put E-Voting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
D G
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:01 AM Response to Original message |
35. I was just looking at "blogforamerica.com" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rumguy
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:03 AM Response to Original message |
58. BOTTOM LINE: If Dean had won, you wouldn't be hyperventilating about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:06 AM Response to Reply #58 |
60. The truth speaks for itself Rummy..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:36 AM Response to Reply #58 |
69. maybe not, but I would respect the other candidates' supporters... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:40 AM Response to Reply #69 |
72. I've asked repeatedly here and nobody will answer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:55 AM Response to Reply #72 |
78. Personally, I don't know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:59 AM Response to Reply #78 |
82. because I'm a skeptic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy_Stephenson
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:12 AM Response to Reply #82 |
91. Have you read Guy Lancasters resume? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:14 AM Response to Reply #82 |
93. You've missed my point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:18 AM Response to Reply #93 |
96. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:25 AM Response to Reply #96 |
99. She says there is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:30 AM Response to Reply #99 |
101. well that's clearly your right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:59 AM Response to Reply #72 |
83. If the "different returns" are correlated with different voting systems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:02 AM Response to Reply #83 |
84. If in fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:03 AM Response to Reply #83 |
85. Not So, Ma'am |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:07 AM Response to Reply #85 |
87. to clarify something, Magistrate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:12 AM Response to Reply #87 |
90. Thank You, Sir |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 09:10 AM Response to Reply #72 |
116. Without exit polls .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy_Stephenson
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:03 AM Response to Reply #69 |
86. Republican, Democrat, Green, Black, White, Gay or Straight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:11 AM Response to Reply #86 |
88. And I'd die for yours... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy_Stephenson
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 05:17 AM Response to Reply #88 |
94. I'm not sayig it was rigged...I'm not saying it wasn't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creativelcro
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 07:58 AM Response to Reply #94 |
109. I think that all election performed with uncertified software |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mairead
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 04:37 AM Response to Reply #58 |
70. Bottom line: that might be true, but it changes nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creativelcro
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 07:55 AM Response to Reply #58 |
108. That is the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creativelcro
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
107. Dookus I posted the initial thread on this topic, and it was balanced. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
110. So did Kerry rig the vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 08:29 AM Response to Reply #110 |
113. Pubs using their networks to scuttle the front runners |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:03 PM Response to Reply #113 |
118. When Al Sharpton starts winning primaries, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theboss
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 09:05 AM Response to Original message |
115. Oh, for Pete's sake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Wed Feb-04-04 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
119. Eloriel aren't you a green who voted AGAINST the Democratic nominee... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC