Anti-Clark media: OK votes shown horizontally w/Clark as last name

[FullCountNotRecount]

when his votes were the most when he was tied with Kerry and Edwards at 30% early in the evening. Also the percentage Clark had in one state was shown on the crawl line as 10% in one state when he had 4,000 more votes than the next contender.

Something anti-Clark is going on and it's only making me want to fight for Clark harder. Wesley Clark, Jr. is right about media bias.

[MrSlayer]

1. Yes, it is painfully obvious.

They really want him out of this race and are doing everything they can to make it happen. The media is setting us (America) up for a fall.

[GodHelpUsAll2]

2. Media

The media is setting us ALL up. They wrote Kerry's obituary a few monts back, they attacked the hell out of Dean for weeks on end over and over distorting and out right fabricating, they gave Mosley Braun and Kucinich practically no air time at all and now they have come up with this "electability" BS. They declared Kerry the nominee after 2 small states, now they have changed to a 2 man race between Edwards and Kerry with only 10% of the delegates accounted for not even mentioning Clark in their assessment (by the way as it stands today in Delegates it's Kerry, Dean and Edwards in the top 3 slots so how they can call for Dean to drop out is beyond me) Join me in my relentless emailing every media outlet on a daily basis and pointing
out every little thing they distort or fabricate or ignore.

I am mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!!!!

[TexasPatriot]

3. i agree

they've been tearing down our candidates for a year, starting with Kerry all the way to now. We need BBC America to cover the campaigns or our own liberal version of Faux or something.

[Frangible]

4. Yes but

PEOPLE SAW JANET JACKSON'S BOOB!

Don't you know what's most important to our media?!

[NV1962]

5. What, surprised?

Having to defend an ample record of covering for that coward posing as President, what else can media do other than try to avoid the embarrassment of getting an intelligent, courageous and decent man back in the White House, which by comparison would make their prior bushlicking rather pathetic?