Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich campaign losing touch with political reality

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 07:04 PM
Original message
Kucinich campaign losing touch with political reality
Hearts And Minds : Larry Durstin : Delusions of Grandeur

Columns / News & Opinion
Date: Feb 04, 2004 - 11:24 AM
Kucinich campaign losing touch with political reality

E-mail Larry Durstin at: ldurstin@freetimes.com

We all know how the game is played when it comes to presidential primaries. Candidates who are hopelessly behind always find a way to rationalize how victory will be snatched from the jaws of defeat and the critics, pundits and pollsters will be proved both wrong and downright foolish.

And that's all well and good and is certainly as American as both cherry pie and violence. A nod and a wink goes a long way in politics, and the crusading longshot truly does deserve both encouragement and admiration — up to a point, that is, and Dennis Kucinich is coming perilously close to careening through that point and into The Twilight Zone.

Watching Kucinich say with what appears to be a straight face that his strategy is to stay in the race until the Boston convention in July when the party, hopelessly split and unable to settle on a nominee, miraculously turns to him as its standard bearer, is as depressing as being subjected to the simultaneous re-emergence of both Donald Trump and Dennis Miller into prime-time television programming

First of all, in the event of a brokered convention — which will not happen, of course — only an MIT mathematician could calculate the number of ballots that would have to be taken before Kucinich's name would even be mentioned, let alone be voted on and actually nominated. It's one thing to say that should you not perform well in the primaries, you want your ideas to carry on and resonate with the party and even be part of the platform, but to concoct the kind of preposterous scenario Kucinich and his followers are putting forth is an insult to voters' intelligence.

more: http://www.freetimes.com/print.php?sid=995



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. What did you expect? Durstin backs Clark
Maybe you should look for an article by somebody who's not a stooge for the DLC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He doesn't seem too conservative
Senator Joe Lieberman's characterization of his fifth-place finish in New Hampshire as a “tie for third” was deservedly lampooned by late-night comics. But let's be honest about Lieberman. He's been a decent legislator throughout most of his career, but the only reason he's in the national spotlight is that he very publicly rebuked Bill Clinton during the 1998 impeachment witch hunt, and Al Gore, looking to distance himself from Clinton, chose Lieberman as a running mate to emphasize his independence from the two-term president. Though this questionable strategy failed, resulting in the election of Bush, Lieberman still chose to bring his neocon-like hawkishness and tiresome moralizing to this campaign with predictably disastrous results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think you've mischaracterized Gore's 2000 "loss"
I don't think the selection of Lieberman as VP by Gore to "emphasize his independence" was what cost Gore the election. I think it was a lot of crooked actions by the Republicans that put Bush in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. I doubt the Clark camp wants to slam Kucinich.
I refuse to believe this article is representative of Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kucinich has been buried so many times by some DU-ers
that he should be buried in China by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. well maybe when CAFTA
is signed...Dennis will remerge in China after •some• have so foolishly buried him so deep.
:evilgrin:


Stupid article...typical of what DK supporters have had to endure the past year...hey if they ignore him all the time then who is gonna read that article,right?
:shrug:

Peace
DR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. So he expects him to admit he doesn't have a chance?
That'll make him more credible? Less insulting to his supporters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. When was it ever in touch with political reality?
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. maybe it's in touch with something bigger
more fundamental, more honest, and more important than "political" reality.

His lack of success only serves how far we yet have to go as a nation--and how far we may have to fall to get there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Desertrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. and you,dolstein, are an expert because...??
Edited on Wed Feb-04-04 07:31 PM by Desertrose
..........you post on a message board, right.
:eyes:

edited to add -great point green arrow...it does concern me too, how far we may have to fall....


Peace
DR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. just can't find the right words
Edited on Wed Feb-04-04 08:13 PM by cosmicdot
:eyes:

so, I'll just use a smiley

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC