Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brit Hume connects the dots: "Who Really Ended Valerie Plame's Career?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 08:36 AM
Original message
Brit Hume connects the dots: "Who Really Ended Valerie Plame's Career?"
Anyone surprised by this, raise your hands now.

:evilgrin:



It was a story that consumed official Washington for three years and was fanned by media reports. But a Washington Post editorial today says the revelation that Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, not a partisan gunslinger, was the original leaker in the Valerie Plame case undercuts what it calls "one of the most sensational charges leveled against the Bush White House that it orchestrated the leak of Ms. Plame's identity to ruin her career" and punish her husband, Bush critic Joe Wilson. The Post flatly declares that it is now clear those accusations are "untrue."

Wilson's attorney continues to insist that White House officials publicly tried to punish him by outing Valerie Plame as a CIA operative and says the paper wrongly implied that he was sent to Niger at his wife's suggestion, though one investigation found just that.

But The Post claims Wilson should have expected that questions about the origins of his mission would point to Plame, saying: "The person most responsible for the end of Ms. Plame's CIA career is Mr. Wilson" himself.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,211817,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. oh for peteys sake!
Edited on Sat Sep-02-06 08:41 AM by rodeodance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. So Armitage is not a partisan?
Or is he not a gunslinger?

I am confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, I see... A reference to a WP --{EDITORIAL}- means it's all true.
Edited on Sat Sep-02-06 08:43 AM by Prag
:eyes:

We see the workings of the 'RWNM' trying to clear Rover and all of the other
scum-skin bags of the Current Administration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. How many years has it taken them
to come up with this pile of BS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. About 1.
By 2004 many RWers believed he was the original source for Novak's article. Nobody seriously argued against the assertion--he fit Novak's profile. No later evidence affected the reasoning that lead to Armitage.

But other potential leakers were much more attractive. In the relevant sense of the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. I can't wait till the civil case.
I hope that the Wilson's lawyers go for the jugular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Same here.
I've got one of those popcorn variety barrels and I intend to use it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. If a judge allows it...
We can only hope.

Have I told anyone lately how much I despise Brit Hume?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thought for SURE he was going to say Bill Clinton
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. No, he's the guy responsible for 9/11...
Edited on Sat Sep-02-06 08:49 AM by Human Torch
:silly:

Gotta say, I'm really, really, really disappointed in Harvey Keitel for participating in that drivel ("The Path to 9/11").



"That gives us exactly... forty minutes to get the fuck out of Dodge. Which, if you do what I say when I say it, should be plenty. Now, you've got a corpse in a car, minus a head, in a garage. Take me to it."

He should stick to THOSE kinds of movies.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. So, it took them 2 years to come up with this version? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
10. She was outed, there was an investigation, Armitage obviously told
Edited on Sat Sep-02-06 09:04 AM by applegrove
the truth at the start, Judy and Cooper kept their sources hidden. It all would have been over in a month if Libby had told the truth. He choose not to. Rove too - wasn't fully open when he was first questioned. Whose fault is that? Wilson's? Nope. Libby's. Libby could have told the truth and voila - no need to question Judy.

Seems Armitage was one of many who talked to the press. Only obviously he never lied to the grand jury or the FBI or prosecutors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. Wait a minute. If the White House was not out to get Wilson
as Hume and the WP editorial claim, and that what Armitage told Novak concerning Wilson's wife's CIA status was simply "offhand gossip", why would Karl Rove confirm to Novak Plame's status? All Rove had to do was simply say, "That's not information I can either confirm or deny" if someone in the media called for confirmation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clark08 Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'm really dissapointed. I thought that Rove
was nailed on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonehalf Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I'm disappointed that Rove wasn't. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emmadoggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
14. Oooooooh! That's some seriesly heavy-duty INVESTIGATIVE journalism there!!
He got his info from a WaPo EDITORIAL! What a SCOOP, Brit!!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
15. My Eyes, My Eyes!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clark08 Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Yes!
Clark 08...the only electable Dem!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC