Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S.: 'bad news' in Afghan drug war

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 12:29 PM
Original message
U.S.: 'bad news' in Afghan drug war

U.S.: 'bad news' in Afghan drug war

By FOSTER KLUG, Associated Press Writer Thu Aug 31, 5:31 PM ET

WASHINGTON - The U.S.-backed strategy to fight Afghanistan's massive drug trade has been unsuccessful in stemming opium cultivation, which is expected to hit record levels this year, a senior U.S. official said Thursday.

"It's bad news and we need to improve it," said Thomas Schweich, principal deputy assistant secretary of state for international narcotics. "But we don't feel it's a hopeless situation, and we don't think the overall strategy is the wrong strategy."

Schweich spoke to reporters as Western officials in Afghanistan were forecasting a possible 40 percent increase this year in land under opium poppy cultivation, despite hundreds of millions of dollars spent in counternarcotics efforts.

Afghanistan produces more than 90 percent of the world's opium and heroin supply, and the drug trade has had a corrosive effect on President Hamid Karzai's struggling government.

more...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060831/ap_on_go_ot/us_afghan_opium


Pretty sure the Bush cabal's response will be: "History will judge this administrations' actions favorably."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RufusEarl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why would anyone keep the present strategy, if it's not working?
"But we don't feel it's a hopeless situation, and we don't think the overall strategy is the wrong strategy."

This tells me they aren't really trying to curb to opium production in Afghanistan, i suspects they are trying to keep the war lords happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Too funny! As though the Afghan opium trade isn't the US petty cash box!
It's one of the main reasons we invaded. The Taliban had shut down our opium fields there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC