Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Santorum being bitch slapped by Casey - Meet The Press

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:26 AM
Original message
Santorum being bitch slapped by Casey - Meet The Press
Man On Dog got noJomentum! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Details please.
It's not on in Pittsburgh until 10:30. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. His record, e.g. supporting the FAILED * policy toward Iraq
and taxes and Social Security, cometh back to bite his pasty arse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I was hoping Casey would get him on Social Security.
Santorum has been running those ads in PA where he's at a polka party with seniors. He talks about working to guarantee their Social Security. Meanwhile, Lil' Ricky did exactly the opposite--toured the state touting Bush's privatization plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I sure hope, and looks like that's the case, that PA seniors aren't biting
Don't know about the cheating factor in PA (hopefully it's nil), but based on this debate, I see Casey winning in a landslide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
56. PA was one of the most statistically anomalous states in
the 2004 Presidential election.

It escaped notice because Kerry still won, but there were, if memory serves,
1 million excess votes for Bush in PA, and Kerry's win was a squeaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. This isn't fair.
I can't wait till 10:30.

:-)

Good news for Mr. Casey in new poll.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x2039848
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. WOOHOO on those polls!!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks for the reminder
It will be on at 10:00 for me.

I hope this deep sixes Ricky for good

:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
7. Im a huge Casey supporter, but sometimes he comes off as
Edited on Sun Sep-03-06 08:39 AM by nickshepDEM
a bit of a putz. How is he doing now? I pray to god he does well, because Santorum supporters have been claiming for months that this race will be all over once Santorum owns Casey in the debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I like what I'm seeing/hearing from him.
He sounds like the voice of sanity in a nut house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. He personally called me on the phone, from his home, on a Sunday night.
Casey is a genuinely nice and caring individual. He spent 45 minutes on the phone with me, and we talked about every issue under the sun. I asked him tough question after tough question, and he seemed very well informed about everything.

I had written him a letter. Mr. Casey said he was so touched by the letter that he felt compelled to respond. I was impressed that he cared enough about one voter's opinions to call her at home from his own home (I could hear his daughters in the background).

I then got to meet Bob at a fundraiser. He is warm and intelligent, and I think this campaigning "thing" is starting to grow on him.

I may not agree with him on every issue, but he would represent this state very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. Did you bring up the voting machines?
That's an issue everywhere now. PA has plenty of opportunity for rigging. He should not concede if he happens to lose no matter what and fight to the bitter end, demand recounts, etc., especially if as usual the polls show him leading going in and/or the exit polls show him winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
64. Wow. You should discuss Casey and the things
you talked about as much as possible here at DU and elsewhere -- it's not often that a person does something like Casey did. It should have some resonance beyond the consersation you had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. I've told many, many people in the area where I live.
Democrats and Republicans, both. They all seem to be very impressed that Casey would make such an effort.

When Casey called he said, "Is this the #### residence?" I said, "Yes." He said, "This is Bob Casey."
I said, "Right." He then said, "No really, it is. I got your letter." Then I knew it was really him, because no one else knew about that letter.

There were a lot of family problems and situations that I explained to Bob. He was genuinely moved by what I had written to him. Can you imagine that arrogant Santorum making such a call?

I got to meet him at a fundraiser in Pittsburgh which John Edwards also attended. Casey remembered me right away.

I know Republicans in this area who are repulsed by Santorum and can't wait to vote him out of office.
Bob Casey will represent our state much better than that sleazy Santorum could ever hope to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. Santorum might have called you...
...if you were, say, a defense contractor, and you were having problems making a humongous profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. Question for PA Duers.
Edited on Sun Sep-03-06 08:48 AM by MyPetRock
Is Rendell supporting Santorum????? Russert quoted Rendell as saying "Santorum delivers."
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. No.
He must be referring to a comment Gov Rendell made a couple weeks ago, but Rendell absolutely supports Casey, I'm working on a combined Rendell/Casey phone bank and canvassing project at the Gov's Pittsburgh HQ.
I also heard the Gov say something nice about his opponent (Swann) at the Dem picnic this summer. That doesn't mean he supports him.
How did Casey respond to this? I can't watch it until 10:30.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. He didn't say much, just that Rendell has been very supportive.
I was a little surprised that he didn't object more vehemently to this lie. Hope Rendell responds soon. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Casey is going to be at the annual Labor Day Celebration
tomorrow at Northmoreland Park, between 1:00 and 3:00. I'm going to try to get over there to show my support.

Casey will also be in the Labor Day Parade in Pittsburgh in the morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. It's going to feel odd
being at the parade with Mayor O'Connor lying in state at the city/county bldg.
I guess I'll go to show my support for both of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #18
49. I'm sorry about Mayor O'Connor- that was a shock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
33. Fucking Russert. Typical if he did say that.
The truncated quote, perhaps?

SANTORUM DELIVERS....death and destruction.

SANTORUM DELIVERS...cold homes in winter, empty school lunch plates.

You get my drift!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. Timbo was definitely implying that Rendell supports Santorum.
I couldn't believe it, that's why I asked. Guess he had to throw the Repukes a bone, lie though it was. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Yeah, I have it on, that bit just came on. Russert is a fuckwad
Ahhh....but NOW they're doing the homeschooling. Hehheheheheheheh....!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. Homeschooling bit was a real beaut!
Dog may run but he can't hide!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #37
61. Well, Rendell has call now to demand some NBC network time
...to refute Timmy's suggestion that he was in the Man on Dog camp. I hope Rendell does some pushing--it can only help!~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
12. Hahaha! Now Santorum is squirming desperately to explain home schooling
his kids, while PA has to pay his local school $55,000 as a result! What a hypocritical weasel.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. glad this issue didn't die ... shows what a selfish/hypocritical
opportunist he is. Oh, especially when combined with his pushing for "tort reform" and reward limits - after his wife sued and won some decent $$$ in a malpractice suit against a chiropractor.

Ricky wants his, but doesn't think anyone else should get theirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
14. So what is it Santorum? Flyovers?
He estimated he may have spent 30 nights in his house in Pennsylvania last year and then went on to defend himself about attacking former opponent on the basis of time spent in Pennsylvania as approximately 28 days during the year. For some odd reason he thinks the fact that he owns a home in Pennsylvania that he may have spent 30 nights in out of 365 makes him better than his former opponent. :rofl:

And good for Timmy. He actually asked a few questions today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Teehee, "about" 30 days and COUNTING!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. Casey seems very intelligent
Ha! What does it mean when people (like me)

care about a debate between candidates who have nothing

to do with my state?


:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Means we want to take back our government!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #17
43. About 30 days, give or take 29!
Which is why we call him
Rick "The Virginian" Santorum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. He's got a 700K house in VA
and a 100K house in Penn Hills.
Hmmm...

I pay more in Alleg Co. taxes than Icky does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Just a bit of trivia
but his house in VA would sell for well over a million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. His house in PA was assessed at $106K
Guess I'd live in the million dollar mansion, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
22. Timmy actually helped the Democratic this morning
Why was Casey unable to say that he would have voted against the war given what we know now? He couldn't get it out.

Casey did win the debate although Timmy helped with several jabs at Man on Dog. BTW, Santorum should never be let anywhere near the levers of government. Anywhere. Ever.

Bio: Me. Born and raised in Pittsburgh. Interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. What's the situation with voting machines there? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #22
39. Actually, he did say
Edited on Sun Sep-03-06 10:25 AM by MH1
** if we knew then what we know now ** he wouldn't have voted for it because it wouldn't have been able to come up for a vote.

He was trying to be supportive of those Dems who did vote for it (and his own prior statements) because this is all a rhetorical exercise - of course we DIDN'T know then what we know now. (Many of us suspected, but suspicion != knowledge)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #39
57. Not about the Casey answer
The WMD have no impact on the fact that the idea of invading Iraq is a strategic geopolitical blunder in addition to being illegal.

Nevertheless, in reference to Casey's answer: Timmy had to ask him several times. I would suggest that any Democrat needs to understand that this will be an issue, and that the answer needs to be unqualified and crisp. Fine, if he wants to say that knowing what we know he wouldn't have voted for it. Personally, I would drop the "never come up for a vote" because it's one too many qualifiers. Get the answer out.

BTW. When I saw Hegel in March, he said that he never bought into the WMD threat about Saddam. He said he voted "yea" to support his president (I hate when the republicans use that possessive pronoun) and because he, Hegel, thought that bush would vigorously pursue diplomacy. Clear answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #22
58. I agree with you - for the most part, Russert was tough on Santorum
and actually helped Casey on rephrasing the IWR question at least twice to get him to restate that he now thinks it was a mistake. Russert seemed to anger Santorum at various points especially when he spoke of how close he was to Bush and when he spoke about his Pennsylvania house.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watercolors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
27. Russett was tough on Santorum
surprised me on he really dogged him for answeres. First time I have seen Casey, I was impressed, really like how calm, cool and collective he seems. Sanitorum seems like a wack job, or a whinny Lieberman type!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. "seems like a wack job, or a whinny Lieberman type!"
Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
29. Why does Russert help those guys by having them on his program?
That is what pisses me off.

Then Russert always uses the right-wing rhetoric whwnever he questions the Democrats when they go on his program.

If I was running for office, I wouldn't go on his program, he just denigrates Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
31. I'm watching it now. Casey has Santorum on the defensive
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Icky's blaming the American people?
Oh, man. He's dug his grave.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
34. Casey put to rest my fears that he is a lackluster candidate.
He acquitted himself very well and,of course, Tricky Ricky was his nausea inducing self. On a side note I thought Fat Timmy bordered on impartial. His performance coupled with Nora O'Donnell's recent impersonation of a real journalist has got to be unsettling to Republicans who have become comfortable using NBC News as a stenographic service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hollowdweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
38. He's KILLING him

Santorum just keeps trying to deflect criticisim of Iraq by trying to blame it all on Iran. Casey is on the attack but also has the whole situation on his side. I also LOVE how he's making sure to tie Santorum to Bush in every sentence just like Bush did with Iraq and 9/11.

Casey is REALLY impressing me. He's after him and really showing a hell of a lot of balls!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CANDO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #38
76. I was thinking about his repetition on the Iran thing myself.
It's just another way of trying to deflect attention away from the fact that they have no plan for ever getting us out of Iraq. It also works nicely for them ginning up the Iran operation. Toward the end, Man on Dog was really getting loud and desperate. I was hoping Bob would tell him to pipe down and stop yelling, but then I realized he let him go so people could see how irate and out of control he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
40. It looked like Lil' Ricky was coming unhinged.
Casey was cool, calm, and collected and conducted himself very well. He seemed in control in contrast to Santorum's red-faced yelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Yes, that's the impression I got also.
The fool has met his Waterloo, and he's in full panic mode! :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
42. You've seen the debate - now go VOTE on it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. Done, but wtf is up with the results?????
Are there REALLY that many stupid people out there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. My guess is the Santorum campaign sent an E-mail out to his supporters
telling them about the poll on Politics PA. I (literally) just got the message a minute ago from snyder@politics.pa.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. OK. That explains it.
Why don't you start a new DU this Poll thread. We need to get some reality into this poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. Good idea, and I'm sorry that I didn't think of it, LOL!
I'll post a message in the GD-Politics forum with the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. Great!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #46
73. And also--->>> it should be posted at the GD section of this forum too
If you really want a LOT of responses... Lots of activity over there.

That poll has been FREEPED big time! If you go to Free Republic, you'll see that 1,477 r-THUGS have already voted for INSANE-atorum.

You are right... the poll needs help, but it won't get it if it's only posted at GD-Politics.

GOOoooOOOOooOOo Casey!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #45
52. the poll needs it's own thread PA'ERS...AND NEEDS TO BE ON
PA BOARD ON DU!! NOW!!

FLY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #52
55. I'll post it in the Pennsylvania forum now
Edited on Sun Sep-03-06 10:59 AM by Penndems
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #52
77. I posted it over at General Discussion...
Then later someone else did too... So it's well represented over there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
50. Santorum was pathetic. What's with that poll? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. Penndems reported that Santorum's people got a mass email
about this poll before it even came out! They have been hitting it early and hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #51
54. Pure speculation on my part, but having worked on political campaigns
since 1994, that would be my guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
53. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
59. He is being slapped by Timmy. That was curious.
I guess Casey won the debate because Ricky was so weak, but, frankly, what was it with Casey saying he would have voted for Santorum Iran bill and agreeing with Santorum on Iran. Did he even read the bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. Casey is extremely week on global issues and especially on the
Iraq and terror war. He needs a real good coach, like Kerry maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
globalvillage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. I think the same answer Sen Kerry gave about Lamont applies.
IIRC, he said that at one point, every senator is a first term senator.
I think Casey's got what it takes. I don't agree with him on every issue, especially on his not supporting a timeline for redeployment, but I do think he will vote with Dems.
And I believe he won the debate decisively. He had Santorum borderline raving. I think Casey's calm demeanor really drives Ricky nuts (or nuttier, I guess).
It's not really a tactic, it's just how Casey is, but IMO, it works well.

I agree, Sen Kerry would be a great mentor for our future senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. The real election season begins on Tuesday.
Casey still has time (not much though) to keep and build onto his lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #63
71. I think Lamont is much clearer on where he stands on Iraq.
I was very disappointed in his quick answer against Kerry's plan. He could have at least given Kerry some credit for certain parts of the plan. It appeared he was running as far away as possible from it. No doubt he will vote Dem though, I never thought he wouldn't. I think the disappointment in his not at least supporting kerry at all was my biggest complaint, that and to a lesser extent, that he seemed a little smug. he is being guided by Paul Begalia,and I can see his influence in this debate. I don't care for Begalia's style.

That said, I need to go back to English 101, I spelled weak wrong. Gosh, I have got to start proof reading.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. He didn't sound weak during the debate.
I just think he needs some fine tuning on how to fight Repukelican lies and smears. It's difficult for decent people to understand how sick and twisted these thugs are, but a little time in the trenches will teach him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
62. Santorum's days are numbered, it wouldn't take much to replace him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
69. Was It Me, Or Did santorum
get more air time, get away with interrupting Casey (a lot), and timmy interrupted Casey too, almost always as he tried to answer, and timmy didn't interrupt santorum near as much as he did Casey. Or was it me?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. I don't think it was you - I think Santorum got far more air time
He's a master at the Repuke trick on fast-endless talking and interrupting your opponent. And Timmy like a lot of the pundits let him get away with it. Plus in some cases not letting Casey answer a talking point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #69
72. I think he did give Santorum more time.
But that just gave the little blowhard fascist more opportunities to bury himself. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Dooley Donating Member (113 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
74. Actually...
...I thought Casy was extremely weak on MTP this morning. He sounded unprepared and did not debate well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. Another Dog-Man fan surfaces!
Must be the word "bitch" in my title! }(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-03-06 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #74
78. Why is it....
....that only those who are non-DU supporters liked Santorum more than Casey in that debate?

Santorum SUCKED.

Casey easily won.

Strange... strange.... strange..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. It's also interesting how these types come in waves,
usually following some pathetic media flop by a r/w nutjob. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC