Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the ugly right-wing background of the new editor of TIME magazine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 02:02 AM
Original message
the ugly right-wing background of the new editor of TIME magazine
Edited on Mon Sep-04-06 02:08 AM by grasswire
Richard Stengel, the new editor of TIME magazine, was previously the head of an organization called the National Constitution Center.

The National Constitution Center is mostly funded by the Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation -- $12 million between 2000-2004.

http://www.mediatransparency.org/funderprofile.php?funderID=17

Some highlights:

Richard DeVos is co-founder of Amway Corporation and owner of the Orlando Magic (2004), and served as the finance chairman of the Republican National Committee. He ranks in the Forbes 400 and is, according to Forbes, amoung the world's richest people, with an estimated worth of $1.7 billion in 2003122.

DeVos attended the Christian Calvin College, and he has been associated with numerous other Christian and conservative organizatons, such as the Council for National Policy, the Chairman's Council of the Conservative Caucus, the Free Congress Foundation, and the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy. His foundation's grantmaking reflects these conservative Christian te3ndencies and affiliations. In fact, Helen DeVos told the Grand Rapids Press that "our biggest priority is to give back to Christian causes.123" The foundation ranks eighth in the top 50 U.S. foundations awarding grants for religion, circa 2000, as published by the Foundation Center.

Among the top 20 foundations studied, the Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation ranks fifth in total conservative policy giving, providing $12,159,101 between 1999 and 2001 to groups such as Focus on the Family, the State Policy Network, the Intercollegiate Studies Institute and other nationally influential public policy organizations in the fields of education, advocacy, research, religion, media and law. The foundation also provides grants to local (for instance, western Michigan and central Florida) churches, arts groups, ministries, and Christian Schools. For example, the foundation contributed $4 million to the Grand Rapids Christian School Association in 2000. The foundation also established and continues to fund the Urban Leadership Initiative, a national program designed to "identify and train emerging youth ministry leaders in local urgban communities.125" However, DeVos cautions that the foundation's social service grantmaking is intended to help people move out of poverty, not to "make 'em too comfortable there."126" Almost all of the grants are unrestricted.

The grantmaking of the other DeVos family foundations is similar to that of the Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation. The Dick and Betsy DeVos Foundation provides funding to many of the same organizations as the Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation (detailed below). However, the other smaller foundations tend to give less to large national organizations and more to local Christian, arts and social service organizations in Michigan.

The contributions of the Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation have helped to promulgate Christian, conservative ideals.

Most explicitly, they donated $635,386 in 1999 to Compass Arts, a nonprofit advertising firm that creates Christian ads for organizations such as Michigan Right to Life. On a national level, the foundation provides numerous grants to Christian organizations that work to influence public policy and public opinion, such as Focus on the Family, the Foundation for Traditional Values, and the Traditional Values Coalition.

People for the American Way calls Focus on the Family "the largest international religious-right group in the United States,"127 with almost 1,300 employees, a budget exceeding $120 million, 6,000 radio facilities worldwide, and 2.3 millino subscribers to its magazines. Using these resources, the organization endorses prayer in schools, private school vouchers, and "reparative therapy" for gays and lesbians, while it opposes female reproductive choice, hate crime legislation and comprehensive sexual education.

The Foundation for Traditional Values works to stop the deterioration of Judeo-Christian values "by clearly, and dynamically, revealing the role of God, faith, religion and morality in our national heritage."128 The organization hopes that public education efforts in this vein will strengthen citizen involvement.

The Traditional Values Coalition acts as a lobbying and grassroots organizaton, lobbying Congress itself and organizing local churches in lobbying efforts. The coalition's work revolves around homosexuality, reproductive rights and school curricula regarding sexuality and evolution. It sponsors voter education programs that suppy information about how various candidates voted on certain issues. It has influenced a great deal of legislation at both the state and national levels regarding hate crime, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, political contributions by churches, and health education curricula.

In addition to its support for Focus on the Family and the Foundation for Traditional Values, the Dick and Betsy DeVos Foundation also supports the Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty, where Betsy DeVos serves on the board. The Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation has supported the institute in the past. The Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty attempts to link economics with religion and traditional virtues and sponsors workshops for business executives, religious leaders, professors and others involved in religion, business and economic research. The institute also publishes a number of documents in order to disseminate its view to the general public, policymakers and other leaders.

The Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation also contributes to the aforementioned Council for National Policy, where Richard DeVos has served on the executive committee and board of governors and which has been described as "very dangerous and dangerously secretive"129 in the eyes of liberals. Because of its secretive nature, it is difficult to fully ascertain the activities of the council. However, it is clearly a conservative organization that works to effect public policy changes at the national level. It was founded in part by the Rev. Tim LaHaye, leader of the Moral Majority, and it strives to combat what it sees as liberal control over the country and focuses on issues in domains ranging from social to economic. ABC News reported that "it provided a forum for religiously engaged conservative Christians to influence the geography of American political power."130 The council supports a strong national defense, Christian values, conservative morals and limited government.

Like the F.M. Kirby Foundation, the Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation supports the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies, the Heritage Foundation, the American Enterprise Institue for Public Policy Research, and the Media Research Center. The Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation also supports the State Policy Network, an association of 40 conservative state agencies nationwide. More locally, the foundation provides funding to the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, which uses its research to propose and promote various policies in Michigan. It analyzes issues such as private school vouchers, charter schools, privatization, taxes and welfare reform, and presents its evaluations and recommendations to individuals working in policy, academia, business and the media. Like many of the organizations listed abgove, the Mackinac Center promotes private, rather than government, solutions to policy issues.

The Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation also provides grants to the Free Congress Foundation (FCF), which claims that its main focus is on the "Culture War." It hopes to "return to the culture that made it great, our traditional Judeo-Christian, Western culture."131 It opposes multiculturalism, political correctness and liberal politics. The foundation's National Empowerment Television carries conservative Christian messages into millions of homes nationwide through its 24-hour programming, including Borderline (focusing on immigration policy), Cato Forum (taxes and government regulation), Legal Notebook (crime), Straight Talk (family), and On Target with the National Rifle Association (gun policy). The organization has four main centers to address issues like law and democracy, judicial selection, cultural conservatism and technology policy.

In addition to their contributions to the Council for National Policy, the Heritage Foundation, the Federalist Society, and the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, the Dick and Betsy DeVos Foundation also funds the Competitive Enterprise Institute and the National Center for Policy Analysis.

The Competitive Enterprise Institute is "dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government."132 It prides itself not only on researching regulatory issues (e.g., environmental policies and antitrust legislation) but also on publicizing and advocating its analyses and ideas to the general public, policymakers and judges. Thus, as the organization is "engaged in many phases of the public policy debate,"133 it plays an important role in influencing policy at the national level.

The National Center for Policy Analysis endorses privatizing Social Security, as well as the few remaining public components of the nation's health care, education, welfare, and criminal justice systems.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Stengel's plans for TIME
from the NYT article


....(Time's new managing editor Richard Stengel's) plan is to fill the pages of Time with more essays and news analysis, give the magazine a sharper point of view and draw more brand-name journalists into the fold. If this sounds familiar, it may be that Mr. Stengel wants Time to be little more like its chief rival, Newsweek, which already has a star roster of essayists like George Will, Anna Quindlen and Fareed Zakaria.

So far, Mr. Stengel has drawn attention to the magazine by hiring Ana Marie Cox, a writer known less for her journalistic chops than for her previous job writing heavily opinionated posts on the gossip blog Wonkette. He has also highlighted articles that are largely reported essays, like the cover story about the Middle East in the July 31 issue, “The Way Out,” by Michael Elliott. “It’s about having an idea that is different,” Mr. Stengel said. “I want to have people talk about what we’re writing about.”

As Mr. Stengel tries to shake up Time, Newsweek is undergoing a shake-up of its own. Tomorrow, the magazine is expected to confirm reports that its managing editor and heir apparent, Jon Meacham, will succeed the magazine’s longtime editor, Mark Whitaker....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I meant to point out the ridiculous irony of....
...this "family values" fellow hiring Wonkette.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. "sharper point of view"
Do we need to even guess what that means?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. I use to buy Time magazine and loved it.
But I canceled my subscription after they did that puff piece on Ann the Man. It has lost a lot of its hard hitting investigative journalism that I use to enjoy. By making it into a mouthpiece for the neocons Richard Stengel is guaranteed to lose even more subscribers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alvarezadams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Don't forget
that Time was once run by Luce. Can't get much more hardcore rw than that without wearing an SS uniform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Luce was a Dame of Malta
Just one of the 'boys'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. Guilt by (indirect) association?
Edited on Mon Sep-04-06 09:24 AM by MH1
98% of your post is about DeVos, who happens to be a major funder of the National Constitution Center. Stengel used to run the National Constitution Center. So?

Your post does not give ANY information to support that Stengel reflects the questionable values of DeVos, or that the National Constitution Center does.

As a person living in the Philadelphia area, I object to your smearing one of our landmark institutions with exactly zero evidence. I'll admit I don't know much about the National Constitution Center beyond the hype, but here's a couple points that come to mind:

1) how is celebrating the Constitution and educating people about it "right-wing"? (Maybe DeVos just doesn't realize how his other values conflict with the values expressed in the US Constitution)

2) one of the finest discussion shows on the radio, "Justice Talking" is broadcast from the National Constitution Center. Justice Talking is hardly indicative of what you seem to be accusing Stengel of - in fact, it indicates exactly the opposite. (although Stengel may have nothing to do with it, I don't know).

So, could you please explain what it is about the National Constitution Center that makes someone who used to run it, some sort of right-wing ideologue?

And if you have other evidence against Stengel, fine - submit it and leave the National Constitution Center out of it.

Edit to add: link to Stengel's statement about the mission of the National Constitution Center:
http://www.constitutioncenter.org/about_us/WhatistheNationalConstitutionCenter/index.shtml

Deoesn't sound very right-wing to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Here's a list of their Board of Trustees..
National Constitution Center Board of Trustees

John C. Bogle, Chairman


Shahara Ahmad-Llewellyn, Vice Chairman
Richard M. DeVos, Sr., Vice Chairman
Lawrence J. Kent, Vice Chairman
Russell E. Palmer, Vice Chairman
Alan L. Reed, Esq., Vice Chairman
Stephen J. Harmelin, Esq., Secretary and General Counsel


Richard Beeman, Ph.D.
David Boies, Esq.
Madison E. Bond
Daniel R. Butler
Margaret Carlson
Gilbert F. Casellas, Esq.
The Honorable Ida K. Chen
Richard Dreyfuss
W. Joseph Duckworth
Andre V. Duggin
Stuart F. Feldman
The Honorable Peter G. Fitzgerald
The Honorable Vincent J. Fumo
Steve M. Galbraith
The Honorable Robert W. Godshall
Dorothy Tapper Goldman
The Honorable Slade Gorton
Vartan Gregorian
Dana B. Hall, CFA
Ben W. Heineman, Jr.
Paul C. Heintz, Esq.
Walter Isaacson
Linda E. Johnson, Esq.
Sidney Kimmel
Alan Roberts McFarland
William G. Paul, Esq.
Vivian Weyerhaeuser Piasecki
The Honorable Edward G. Rendell
Derrick A. Roman
William A. Slaughter, Esq.
The Honorable Dolores K. Sloviter
Stephen D. Steinour
Paul R. Verkuil, Esq.
Chris Whittle
A. E. Wolf, Chairman Emeritus

*Updated February 7, 2006
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. And?
What does it have to do with Stengel? how does it prove Stengel to be a right-winger? What other evidence is there?

And why does DeVos' involvement necessarily mean that an organization that seems to do excellent work, is necessarily some tool of the right-wing? Maybe the guy is just idealistic about the Constitution, no matter how whacked some of his other ideas are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. okay, I'll bite
For many years, Stengel knowingly accepted the money of an entity that is in direct opposition to American values -- the DeVos Foundation. He knowingly served at the pleasure of some of America's most despicable ideologues -- people who are even more anti-democratic than Pennsylvania's Richard Mellon Scaife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Give me a break. And some evidence. (the op provides none)
Edited on Mon Sep-04-06 12:17 PM by MH1
See my post below:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2810031&mesg_id=2810358

Now, even if the NCC has been the recipient of the alleged 12 million: Stengel is the outgoing President & CEO. There is a board. Does the President & CEO get an absolute veto on whether to accept that sizable a donation, in the first place?

Now, let's say you are the President & CEO of a major educational institution, and have just been offered a huge donation. But you decide to reject the offer because of your partisan political beliefs. How long do you think you will get to keep your job?

Now, if you are going to provide some actual evidence that the claim made in the op is true - I am not saying it's false, just that the link provided does not show it to be true - then could you also provide some information as to the overall budget of the Center; what Mr. Stengel's salary was while he was there; some documentation that shows Stengel had any say in accepting or rejecting $12 million in donations; and any statements or actions by Stengel that demonstrate him to be a right-winger.

I am not meaning to defend Stengel here - I have no idea what he is really like, just that the NCC is considered successful and positive, and is good for the city of Philadelphia. I think the original post is glaringly ill-formed and does not remotely support the conclusion in the subject line. If you cannot provide a little more substance, than I might even begin to think it is trollish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. Help me out here - your link does not substantiate your claim
Edited on Mon Sep-04-06 12:07 PM by MH1
You state:

The National Constitution Center is mostly funded by the Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation -- $12 million between 2000-2004.


And provide this link:
http://www.mediatransparency.org/funderprofile.php?funderID=17

Yet, I cannot find the National Constitution Center mentioned on the page that link points to, while many others receiving smaller amounts are listed.

Meanwhile - If they received $12 million from the DeVos Foundation - I would think the DeVos Foundation would be listed on the NCC's "Partners" page, along with:

National Constitution Center Partners

The History Channel

The Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania

Morgan Lewis, founding legal sponsor
In 1997, to commemorate the firm’s 125th Anniversary, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius became the Founding Legal Sponsor of the National Constitution Center. With a gift of more than $500,000, the firm was the first in the Philadelphia legal community – and in the nation – to make a commitment to the Center’s capital campaign. This gift kicked off the Center’s Power of an Hour Initiative among large law firms and individual attorneys. The firm and its partners have served as advocates for the Center in this broader effort to raise support.

National Archives and Records Administration

The University of Pennsylvania

WHYY

WPVI -6

Justice Talking
Justice Talking is an award-winning radio show that engages listeners in timely, honest debates on the current legal battles that capture our nation’s attention. Each weekly program tackles tough, provocative issues featuring compelling debate between the nation’s leading advocates and their political opposites. Justice Talking is produced by the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.


http://www.constitutioncenter.org/about_us/Partners/index.shtml

I bolded $500,000 because it seems a paltry sum to be mentioned here, when a donor of $12 million is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terip64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. info about donors
http://www.constitutioncenter.org/support/MeetOurDonors/index.shtml

I am trying to figure it all out, but the 12 mil is accurate, for whatever that is worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. great - sarcasm off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Please don't buy it
unless some better evidence is presented.

The link in the op doesn't show a $12 mil contribution to the National Constitution Center, that I can see.

And how the heck would it be up to Stengel to reject the money anyway? NCC has a board. I would assume they make those decisions.

DeVos may be a right winger but the NCC is NOT a right wing organization - it's a Philadelphia historical/education center that does A LOT of good stuff, including broadcasting Justice Talking.

I don't understand the purpose of the op. I could speculate, but I won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. ok
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. Henry and Clare Booth Luce would be proud
When Luce ran Time, it was a hard core elephant ass-kissing right wing rag. It moved a little to the center after he died, but it's always been pro-Republican. I refuse to read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alvarezadams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Few people
who read about PNAC know that the name was lifted from an essay of Luce's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Proud of the op? Stengel worked on Bill Bradley's campaign.
http://poynter.org/forum/view_post.asp?id=11424

You know, sometimes a "museum, education center and think tank on Independence Mall in Philadelphia dedicated to teaching the importance of the Constitution and civic engagement" is just what it says it is, regardless of who chooses to write big checks to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. Now, let's talk about Stengel
since you spent so much space on DeVos.

Stengel:

* Friend of Eric Alterman: http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12799378/#060517 (ctl-F for Stengel)

From Poynter (http://poynter.org/forum/view_post.asp?id=11424):

* Stengel has also written for The New Yorker, The New Republic and The New York Times.
* In 1998 he taught a course at Princeton called “Politics and the Press” before...
* ... moving to a very different political arena in 1999 as a senior advisor and chief speechwriter for presidential candidate Bill Bradley.
* Since 2004 he has been the President and CEO of the National Constitution Center, which is a museum, education center and think tank on Independence Mall in Philadelphia dedicated to teaching the importance of the Constitution and civic engagement. (OMG, such a right-wing mission!)

Can we cut the crap yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fuzzyball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Your posts here reek of facts whereas the thread originator reeks of
inuendo, guilt by association, and zero facts re: the Mr. Stengel
himself. Congrats for taking time to throw in a lot of FACTS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. i haven't renewed my Time subscription
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
23. one more reason to NOT READ TIME MAG!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC