Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Broken news: Media off target, again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BobcatJH Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 04:34 PM
Original message
Broken news: Media off target, again
Moving into a new place, as most of you know, is a massive pain in the ass. So much to do, so little time. So many important tasks falling through the cracks if you forget. So much packing, unpacking, assembling and disassembling before you can finally settle, before you can let out a sigh of relief. If you don't keep your eyes on the prize, completing one task at a time, moving in can soon seem like an almost impossible goal, an unreachable destination left only to those with proper time management skills and the necessary stick-to-itiveness. Minor distractions so deviously take you away from what needs to be done, occupying your time when there are many, many more important things left to do. And now, thanks to an easily-distracted media led astray by the high-calorie, low-content story du jour, the American public is paying the same price for the Fourth Estate not staying on target.

Over the last few weeks alone, the mainstream media has done the American public a tremendous disservice. Think of all that's happened and what should have been under the journalistic spotlight - or, that was but was quickly tossed aside when a sexier story hit the wires. Iraq. Iran. Israel and Lebanon. (Or, to sum up the first three, the disastrous Bush foreign policy.) A judge declaring the administration's warrantless wiretapping unconstitutional. The anniversary of Hurricane Katrina. And on and on. Major stories all. Major stories abandoned when shinier, more attention-grabbing stories came around. The last month represented an important growth opportunity for the American media. Yet sadly, we remain one nation, under the Crocodile Hunter, with JonBenet and John Mark for all.

While America reacted Monday to the tragic death of Steve Irwin, television's "Crocodile Hunter", another sad occurrence may have slipped through the cracks. With the announcement Sunday that four U.S. service members had died in Iraq, the American death toll for that war and the so-called war on terror reached 2,974, just shy of 3,000. What you might have missed, however, is the fact that more Americans have now died in Iraq and elsewhere than the total - including Americans and foreign nationals - who died on September 11. Yesterday afternoon, just before a commercial break, CNN's John King asked, "Also ahead: The Crocodile Hunter could be killed by a - if - if - if the Crocodile Hunter could be killed by a stingray, are you at risk?" I'm guessing the families of those four brave American soldiers would find that threat trivial.

Irwin's death, I'm sure, won't have the staying power of another recent media infatuation, that of a possible break in the JonBenet Ramsey murder case. Take, for instance, Thursday, August 17, when NBC, CBS and ABC each led their nightly news broadcasts with wall-to-wall coverage of the decade-old case, especially alleged Ramsey killer John Mark Karr. Total time devoted to the story was 7:39, 3:23 and 4:03, respectively. This, of course, is to say nothing of the countless hours of cable news time devoted to the typical cable news fare, missing and/or dead white women (or girls). But a funny thing happened on the way to Aruba.* That same Thursday, news broke that a federal judge had declared the Bush administration's warrantless wiretapping unconstitutional, saying, "Plaintiffs have prevailed, and the public interest is clear, in this matter. It is the upholding of our Constitution." How much coverage did this stunning, administration-rebuking revelation draw from NBC, CBS and ABC? Well, :27, :25 and 2:00, respectively.

I thought a year ago, obviously prematurely, that the media had awoken from its slumber, a deep sleep that began when President Bush took office. A sleep that began when the Beltway-anchored political press corps decided that access trumped accountability. And a sleep that was no doubt encouraged by the administration-friendly corporations that own so much of what we see, read and hear. Shaken last year by the enormity of Katrina, traditionally mild-mannered anchors and correspondents gave audiences a true glimpse at the raw nerves left exposed after the storm. Remember Anderson Cooper dressing down Sen. Mary Landrieu and her colleagues for patting themselves on the back as federal delays mounted? Remember Aaron Brown and Paula Zahn speaking out, questioning the Pentagon's motives and challenging Michael Brown? Remember Fox News stalwarts Shepard Smith and Geraldo Rivera, both on-the-ground along the Gulf Coast, challenging studio hosts to recognize the tragedy as it unfolded? In other words, remember when Keith Olbermann wasn't seemingly the only one doing his job? What a difference a year makes.

No one's denying that the Ramsey case's latest developments were, in some way or another, worthy of coverage. Or that Irwin's untimely, yet sadly predictable, death is something of note. That said, you'd have to be Nancy Grace, Rita Cosby or Joe Scarborough to put forth the idea that either story should predominate the news, which both have. The truly terrible news - for all of us - is that there appears to be far more Graces, Cosbys and Scarboroughs acting as gatekeeper than there are Olbermanns. And unlike Olbermann, whose ability to focus, to stay on target, is without peer, the third-rate talents dominating the media have the attention span of an out-of-control child. And each hasty transition from story of significance to story of insignificance comes at our nation's peril. When the end of democracy comes, it'll come to us live, on location, with team coverage, from Aruba.

* So to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheFriedPiper Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Be careful, some here would accuse you of "vitriol" against Irwin
because, unless you act like his death is THE most important thing to talk about, much less DARE to insinuate that there are more important topics to discuss, the sensitivity squad will be on you like the media on a missing white woman




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Higans Donating Member (819 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Honey, the TV is Broken...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FoxOnTheRun Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. TV news hasn't been on my TV
since the Clinton Impeachment when the corporate media circled like vultures on what they thought were the last vestiges of democracy and common sense.
The only news I watch now comes from Olbermann, Stewart and Ted Hitler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. but you are not supposed to know there have been soldiers killed in Iraq
we don't get the fine detail of these brave men fighting for their lives out in Iraq. We get the fine details of how the stingray pierced poor Steve Irwin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. The milestone has only been noted online
More Americans dead in Iraq than in all of the attacks on 9/11. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. I have a slight disagreement with this
I don't believe that the reason for the woefully inadequate coverage of such things as Bush's actions being judged unconstitutional is related to sexier stories being available at the same time or the media being distracted, etc. Not at all. I believe that the reason is much more pernicious than that.

Our corporate news media does not want these things to get traction with the public. It is the same reason that they gave much more coverage to the SBVFT than to Bush's shirking his National Guard duty. Or the same reason that they gave much more coverage to one possibly forged memo relating to Bush's shirking his National Guard duty than they did to the story of his shirking his National Guard duty itself. Or the reason that they barely mentioned the huge exit poll discrepancies following the 2004 election. Or the reason that they didn't mention Bush being wired for the debates with Kerry. Or the reason that they virtually ignored the Downing Street memos or all the evidence against the presence of WMD in Iraq prior to the war. Or the same reason that ABC is about to air a revisionist account of the September 11 attacks. Or the same reason that they tried to imply that Democrats were just as tied up with Jack Abramoff as Republicans.

One of the main goals of our corporate news media is to protect the Bush administration and its Republican supporters in Congress and to make sure that Democrats don't get control of our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. My current level of disgust with the so-called Cable "news" overflow-ith!
I was an 12-18 hour per day news viewer before 2001, I don't ever turn it on now. The closest I come now is NPR, DU and my RSS Reader.

If you want to hear what Journalism was, you should check out this interview about I.F. Stone:

The Life and Work of I.F. Stone



Listen to this story... (at link)

Talk of the Nation, September 5, 2006 ·
I.F. Stone was an icon of investigative reporting, covering subjects
from the New Deal to Hitler's Germany, the birth of Israel and the Vietnam War.

His newsletter reached tens of thousands of subscribers, but his
influence went far beyond those numbers.

Biographer Myra MacPherson remembers a great journalist.

<http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5769537>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well said !
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. You're not surprised, are you?
Edited on Wed Sep-06-06 02:56 AM by snot
I don't quite see how anyone on DU could be. With rare exceptions, for many years now the corporate media have shown themselves a machine serving their owners' ends, spewing propaganda and distraction.

Media reform must be our no. 2 priority, second only to election reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. The problem with mainstream media...
if that serious journalists don't work there because they recognize that the there's so little news in the mainstream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. wow
K&R
excellent piece
great links
well-said and MUCH appreciated
i shall disseminate it far & wide
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FoxOnTheRun Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
13. Why isn't CNN's Lou Dobbs mentioned?
He talks about 911 Comission lies ,e-voting machines and illegal immigration/North American Union?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC