Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can anyone - Clinton, Clarke, a 9/11 survivor, even a citizen - sue ABC?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
garthranzz Donating Member (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:16 PM
Original message
Can anyone - Clinton, Clarke, a 9/11 survivor, even a citizen - sue ABC?
For libel, slander, defamation of character? They probably wouldn't win - not even get it to court. But if "celebs" can sue scandal sheets and get settlements...

The idea would be to generate buzz, get the news programs talking about the outrage - and the mislabeling of fiction as fact.

Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Class action baby! Let's do it. Any attorney's in the house this evening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Depends on the weasel words
if they want to win. However, winning might not be the aim. Following the money might be a better aim. Publicising the fact that they LIED is the aim.

Lawyers never seem to get that part, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garthranzz Donating Member (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Pro bono
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good luck on that one
(1) Somebody would need to fork over a ton of money to entertain any possibility of legal action - and if there is legal action you can figure it will drag on forever.

(2) The standard of proof is probably going to be "actual malice."

(3) A fictional representation of a factual event is still fiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unschooler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Watch for the disclaimer at the start of the show.
After all, ABC is not suggesting the program is actually true....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Exactly. The disclaimer protects them from it all.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC