Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For everybody who watched Dick "the liar" Cheney on MTP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 10:28 AM
Original message
For everybody who watched Dick "the liar" Cheney on MTP


And now "they" are trotting out the lie that the civil war in
Iraq was caused by al Qaeda ..... I need to shower, I feel dirty
just watching that evil fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. I could smell Cheney's mouth rot
Edited on Sun Sep-10-06 10:29 AM by C_U_L8R
through the TV set.

I think I'm gonna blow chunks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KalicoKitty Donating Member (777 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. I got sick to my stomach watching him LIE!
I had to shut it off after two minutes before I :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. NOPE! first time in a very long time I didn't turn it on!
When I heard yesterday that HE was going to be the exclusive guest, I decided I didn't want to ruin my Sunday like that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. I wish I could interview the asshole on national TV
I would have a blast showing everyone just how much of a liar he really is!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. why do you watch that crap. you know its just going to be more lies and
propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KalicoKitty Donating Member (777 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Condisleezy was also on lying to Blitzer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
umtalal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. did anyone else notice he took off the US flag pin?
Any thought on that? I am curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mentalsolstice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. I Noticed
he didn't have on his flag pin...perhaps it's because he no longer recognizes the UNITED States of America...he thinks it's now simply the state of Haliburton of North America. They haven't agreed yet as to how to incorporate the Haliburton logo onto the new national flag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ouabache Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. I noticed he DID NOT say: "all options are on the table"
with regard to Russert's questions about Iran. I thought that was a significant admission of his waning power within the administration, since, in the past he as ALWAYS used that phrase when talking about Iran and their nuclear activities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. AMERICAN JUDAS




Dick Cheney exposed Valerie Plame to cover up his association with A.Q. Khan's Nuclear Walmart. Read about it here: http://s93118771.onlinehome.us/DU/AMERICANJUDAS.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. His confidence is eroding, just a bit. Timbo isn't quite as inclined to
to toss softballs as he used to be.

He's been held to account to the words he's spoken in the past. Trying to do the Rumfeldian "let me explain what I meant, which is the opposite of the words I spoke" strategy.

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. It was the expression on his face after Timbo showed his March 16,2003
appearance.

The clip ended abruptly and the camera did a quick cutaway to Cheney. Wide eyed, glancing back and forth. The first time I've seen anything other than his death mask expression.

That's all I've got. :hi: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. ' The Evil Elf ' what did you expect ? An hour of Halliburton Sermon
Edited on Sun Sep-10-06 10:40 AM by orpupilofnature57
Where is this erosion of confidence? He begged to Differ ,comfortably said no less than 15 times, I' m not aware or I haven't read ,squirm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. For those of us who have killed the TV, fill us in
What exactly did the Big Dick say?

After months and months if denying there is a civil war in Iraq, he (and pretty soon the rest of his merry band of prevaricators) is now saying there is a civil war in Iraq? And that it's al Qaida's fault?

Well, at least he's not saying it's Clinton's fault. That's the usual fallback position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. in short
The new "line" that the admin is putting out that the Shi v Sunni
fighting in Iraq was caused by al Qaeda and the Zarqawi.

Any fact or question that Dick did not like he said "I disagree w/ the
premise of you question, Tim." and then went on to give a self
serving answer that was usually false.

He also did a lot of putting things into "context."

When asked if he would still invade Iraq knowing what he
knows now (i.e. no link to 9-11, no WMDs, no threat to America) he
said, "yes."

He had one creepy, "I am sure we will maintain both houses after the election."

Russert got him pretty good but again failed to do any real follow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Thank you.
That's pretty much what I would expect out of him.

Russert may have failed to follow up because he thought the obvious spin spoke for itself. It doesn't sound like he was being the usual junta patsy that he's been for too long. At least he was asking questions that should have been asked in 2002, before the invasion. Better late than never, but this is four years, tens of thousands of lives and billions of misappropriated funds late.

I don't necessarily read anything sinister into his talk about holding Congress in the elections. We've heard that kind of bravado before from Candidates about to be buried in a landslide. And right now, the election looks beyond stealing, although we have to make sure it stays beyond stealing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I live in Columbus, OH
and steal they do and then they have the press blame us for
being conspiracy freaks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alvarezadams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. What do you expect?
The gubmint has been spending a lot of money and time in inflating the role of Zarqawi and Al Qaeda in Iraq (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/09/AR2006040900890.html). If you don't use it you lose it.

These Straussian, mendacious bastards have to go. And so do the "establishment politicos" that feed us the one-sided, simplistic drivel that passes for political platforms.

That leaves us with perhaps a handful of elected officials, but it's a start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC