Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Suppose we get what we want in November. What happens then?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 01:04 PM
Original message
Suppose we get what we want in November. What happens then?
If we take control of the House and Senate in November who's going to push for impeachment? Will we get it? Or will we just be told to move on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Then we spend the next two years fighting with the "leadership"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yeah but we should be fighting now.
If Democratic lawmakers can't get riled up over dealing with the most incompetent person to ever sit in the WH in recent history I don't know what will put the fire in their bellies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Simple, we swamp the inboxes of the House Judiciary Committee
Till someone puts Articles up.

THat's the thing about Democrats, if they won't do it of their volition, MAKE them do it! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Have to crawl before we walk.
Edited on Sun Sep-10-06 01:18 PM by longship
First, there has to be investigations. These are very important because they can have a profound effect on public opinion. Those of us who lived through the Watergate scandal could see this in action. First the 1973 Senate hearings, then the House Judiciary (impeachment) hearings a year later convinced the public that Nixon had to go.

The vision of John W. Dean telling the the Senate and the world, "There is a cancer on the Presidency" is one I will never forget. Likewise Peter Rodino's demeanor during the House hearings was unforgettable. You could tell that he was profoundly serious, and at the same time, sad, about the state the country has sank to.

Note it was public opinion which moved the Republicans to support the articles of impeachment in the committee. The fact that these never reached a vote on the House floor was a testament to bi-partisanship at the time. We must now realize that things are going to be much more difficult. The rubber-stamping Repukes in Congress are likely going to be quite immovable, and the Repuke House leadership is likely going to be putting their strongest ideologues on the Judiciary committee to fight the inevitable.

Yes, I feel strongly that impeachment is the inevitable course. However, we're going to have to convince the people that this is a case where it is warranted. After the Clinton debacle, the people are going to be very skeptical. It may take some time to move them, so we're going to have to move slowly and deliberately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Your last paragraph explains the while Clinton witch hunt.
The gop innoculated themselves, dragging this country through an impeachment over a bj. (Conveniently ignoring btw the Jennifer Fitzgerald/GHWB affair while Poppy was in the WH)

So yeah thanks to Monica the public would be skeptical about having another president under investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I don't think people will be skeptical about investigation.
Edited on Sun Sep-10-06 01:46 PM by longship
Investigation is a normal Congressional task. As long as Dems play their cards right, there should be little opposition to it in the public eye. In fact, it is already a majority viewpoint.

But proceeding from investigation to special prosecutor or impeachment hearings should be carefully done. We want to make sure that the public is going along with the program. I think it won't be as difficult as many people think. I think that the people *want* to go down this path, but they will resist strenuously if they think that they're being *dragged* down the path, like in the Clinton matter.

Democrats have to be sensitive to this element. Then, everything will be okay. Chimp/Crashcart will be toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmosh42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Have an agenda with priorities
In other words, see what trade agreements can be overruled or terminated. Make immigration and border laws enforceable with funding. Repeal all these corporate and rich people tax breaks of the last few years for revenue. Terminate royalties for these international oil companies. Try to get allies from the Repubs if 2/3 votes are necessary for an override. Have Justice dept investigate for all legal violations by the Executive branch of gov't, in case impeachment proceedings become a necessity. And on and on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. We'll be told, for the good of the country, we must move on...
Me personally, I'm not interested in impeachment. I want Bush to get what he deserves. I want him Court-Marshalled, I want him brought up on criminal charges. I want him sitting in a courtroom wondering if he's going to live or die. ...He and the rest of THEM should NOT get away with what they've done.

If I had a crystal ball, I think the republicans, (through election fraud) will win in November by the skin of their teeth. I think we'll be in Iran before the year is up.

:mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. That's what I've been thinking too.
Edited on Sun Sep-10-06 02:10 PM by bushwentawol
About the election I mean and about Iran. That's what I want to dearl avoid.
Right after chimpy's first selection dems kept telling us to move on. I myself want to see the whole gang frog-walked out of the WH.

Belated Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I could still...
...picture Robert Novak and Pat Buchanan's faces as they told us that we had to "move-on" and to be "examples" as to how democracies change powers without a hitch.

Thanks for the welcome,

:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. That's so right.....
.......we were to grow up and deal with the debacle in Fla. I mean, Jeb being w's brother had nothing to do with any funny business with the votes down there, or so we were told.

You're very welcome,

:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Then, it is entirely up to the Democrats who are elected to show America
that they are different than the republican and they are better than the republicans and they can make a difference.
If they do not do that, America will dump the Democratic party in 2008 because you know the right wing bull shit coupled with the main stream media whores will be hitting them hard for the full two years between 06 and 08.
Essentially they only have 12 months to make a difference before the 08 election cycle kicks into HI!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. Conyers and Waxman have been trying to hold investigations
into halliburton, the reasons for going to war, etc. But, they can't because the dems are in the minority. They will make lots of noise once they are able to be heard. It will be interesting to see how the press covers this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarlVK Donating Member (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. IMPEACHMENT
Which should be wholeheartedly supported by everyone on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. been covered here many times
we get rid of w for dick, on and on and on, we still have a shit heal in the wh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC