Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could someone explain why Kerry called for Tenet's Resignation?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 03:46 PM
Original message
Could someone explain why Kerry called for Tenet's Resignation?
Sorry, could someone explain to me on what legitimate grounds Kerry called for Tenet's resignation?

Is there a suggestion anywhere that the CIA failed to deliver authentic intelligence and analysis?

The operative word here is "authentic".

Why is this whole debate missing a hard lock on the one central fact that George Bush made the decision to go to war in Iraq. He is responsible. Whether he knew he was going to war on the day he entered the oval office, or whether he carefully decided the invasion after reviewing his so-called "intelligence". Any way yo look at it, it was Field Commander Gourd-crotch who lit that fatty and took a long hard drag when everyone but his butt-buddies were telling him it was a REALLY bad idea.

Accountability anyone?

(I posted this in another thread, but it got missed. I'd like to hear the rational.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Carl Spackler Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. because it will get him in the news looking "presidential"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GalleryGod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. As I tell my College Sophomores: Pol Sci 203
Look it up yourself and TELL us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because it knocks one more boogeyman out of the way
to get to Bush and Cheney.

In addition to which, intelligence issues lingering from 9/11 are enough to call for Tenet's head. He is incompetent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. If the reasons are all as specious as that
If the reasons are really all as specious as that, it casts a serious pall of doubt on Kerry (for me anyway).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. And your nonspecious highly reasoned answer is??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
einniv Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Seems like foolishness to me.
But then he did vote for the war resolution so he can't exactly be shouting that the intel was good because that would imply that he "cooked" the threat too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
28. Kerry forced Tenet to either resign or defend his agency and the
intelligence they provided. He defended his agency and detailed the information he supplied to the administration. Kerry is taking Bush's fall guy out of the equation.....leaving Bush and his neocon PNAC players clearly in the open to charges they distorted and politicized the information to fit their agenda....rather brilliant chess playing on Kerry's part.

Bush lied, 10,000+ people died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. So he won't have to
take personal responsibility for the decision he made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. LINK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Because Tenet was head of the CIA
when 9/11 occurred and because Tenet was head of CIA when Bush went to war.

Either Tenet was incompetent OR Tenet was competent and did not stand up to Bush.

I for one do not want Tenet as head of the CIA in either case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. You left out a possibility
Tenet was competent and the senate failed to stand up to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I certainly have no love for Tenet
Edited on Fri Feb-06-04 04:01 PM by jokerman2004
I certainly have no love for Tenet either, but calling for his resignation creates a diversion from the true accountability. If Tenet is incompetent, his incompetence has served Bush. If Tenet was a collaborator, his collaboration has served Bush.

The President makes the calls. That's what he gets "elected" to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. The President makes the calls. That's what he gets "elected" to do.

So the president should take charge. If he doesn't, others will likely step up and take it from him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
29. Or Bush/Tenet have serious incriminating evidence on each other?
I've wondered why a Clinton appointee like Tenet was not scapegoated for 9/11. Wouldn't that have been the obvious Rovian play on the event? Instead, George said he had total confidence in George's running of CIA.

2 years later, the WH tries to pin the blame the WMD gambit on bad intel, but again Dimson doesn't fire Tenet...rather odd, isn't it?

I think there's much to the two stories that we don't know...yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. If Tenet gave Bush good intelligence and Bush ignored it
Tenet should have blew the whistle right away. If Tenet gave Bush bad intelligence he should be fired. Either way he should go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. And what if
Tenet gave the senate good intelligence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Then he should have blew the whistle on both the Senate and Bush.
Edited on Fri Feb-06-04 04:30 PM by Kerryfan
but that isn't what he is saying now, is it? He is saying he did give them good intelligence, but we know that if he is telling the truth now, he wasn't telling the truth then. Good bye George.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Opportunity knocks and Kerry answers.
He has answered that door since day one, and will do it if he gets the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. Dean was first to call for it . Followed by Lieberman

Kerry Says Bush Lacks Viable Security Plan
July 17, 2003
New York Times

"Let me state it plainly," said Mr. Kerry, a Democratic presidential contender. "Just as we did not have a viable plan for Iraq after the capture of Baghdad, today we still do not have a real plan and enough resources for preparedness against a terrorist attack."

It was among the sterner rebukes of Mr. Bush so far by a Democratic candidate on the topic of national security, and it came in a week in which nearly all the Democratic prospects have been attacking the president on the issue. Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut called today for the resignation of George J. Tenet, the director of central intelligence, following in the footsteps of Howard Dean, the former governor of Vermont, who made a similar demand on Sunday.

Mr. Kerry leveled fresh accusations that the administration had not been forthcoming in its policies about Iraq, particularly in its efforts to promote the war. "It is clear that a dangerous gap in credibility has developed between President Bush's tough rhetoric and timid policies which don't do nearly enough to protect Americans from danger," he said. Mr. Kerry said the president had purposefully stalled the investigation into the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and suggested, ungently, that he "get out of the way."

"It's time we were told the truth about America's safety," he said. "It's time we had a president who will truly make this nation more secure."
http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/clips/news_2003_0717a.html


Kerry Statement on the allegation that CIA Director Admitted White House Pressure on Intelligence Info
July 17, 2003

Democratic Presidential candidate John Kerry today responded to allegations announced this morning by US Senator Richard Durbin that CIA Director George Tenet admitted that an unnamed White House official pressured the CIA to allow unverified nuclear claims to be included in the State of the Union.

John Kerry said, “It’s deeply troubling, but not altogether surprising, to learn that there may have been direct political pressure exerted on the CIA to exaggerate nuclear claims in the President’s state of the union address. This is just more evidence that, as I said yesterday, President Bush must support a full and independent investigation so that the American people know the full truth about what happened.”

The Associated Press reported this morning: “CIA Director George Tenet told members of Congress a White House official insisted that President Bush's State of the Union address include an assertion about Saddam Hussein's nuclear intentions that had not been verified, a Senate Intelligence Committee member said Thursday. Sen. Dick Durbin, who was present for a 4.5-hour appearance by Tenet behind closed doors with Intelligence Committee members Wednesday, said Tenet named the official. But the Illinois Democrat said that person's identity could not be revealed because of the confidentiality of the proceedings.”
http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/releases/pr_2003_0717.html


Can you tell me why Tenent didn't resign then? He admitted that the CIA had helped include the phony info in the SOTU. Why wasn't anyone fired?


Statement from John Kerry on CIA Director George Tenet’s Speech at Georgetown University

February 05, 2004

“Today, the CIA Director, George Tenet, admitted that the intelligence agencies never told the White House that Iraq posed an imminent threat. But that’s not what the Bush White House told the American people. They said Iraq posed a ‘mortal threat,’ an ‘urgent threat,’ an ‘immediate threat,’ a ‘serious threat,’ and, yes, an ‘imminent threat’ to the people of the United States.

“Today, we found out that George Bush, Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, and the rest of the Administration weren’t passing on sound facts on Iraq to the American people - they were playing politics with our national security.

“Americans should be able to trust that what the President tells them is true - especially when it comes to the life and death decisions of war and peace.

“We need to restore America’s credibility around the world and the trust of the American people in their government at home. That’s not going to happen with a sham commission hand-picked by George Bush to look into how these faulty facts on Iraq made it to the American people. It’s not going to happen while the Bush White House continues its stalling and stonewalling. What we need is for this President to take responsibility - to face the truth - and to finally tell the truth to the American people. And we need that now.”
http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/releases/pr_2004_0205f.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cindyw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. I'm beginning to think that
Dean supporters pay more attention to Kerry than they do Dean. I can't tell you how many times in the last week I have seen Dean supporters criticize Kerry for something that Dean was also doing or saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Casablanca Donating Member (549 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. Do any of them know that they're playing into the Bush admin's hands?
George Tenet is the only carryover from the Clinton administration, and as such is the convenient blame target whenever they need to whip out the "intelligence failure" defense. Tenet standing up for the CIA on this issue is a rare act of courage against the Bush regime, and a necessary criticism of their credibility.

Really disappointed in Dean on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Precisely my concern n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. it seems to me that if the CIC says he got bad intelligence
then he should fire the guy who gave it to him...

Bush can't have it both ways - he can't accuse an organization of incompetence and let the head of that organization keep his job.

Kerry is just pointing this out to him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. I think Kerry is in bad faith on this one....
He supported the war and quite possibly sees this as an opportunity to shift the blame to "bad intelligence" in na Bush-like effort to excuse his culpability in this matter.

It won't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. Because Tenet is covering up for GWB and he needs pressure put on him so
he will come forward w the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
23. because bush wants to place the blame on tenet
why is kerry always supporting bush?
it really sucks how he does that.
i mean really -
2000 election, iraq, patriot act, no child left, tenet..
BLEH!
why is he even running against bush? he must love him, i dont get it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
remfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
24. Well, the bush administration suggested the CIA failed
but of course they don't want Tenet to resign, they just want to further discredit the agency.

I don't honestly know why Kerry would call for Tenet's resignation, unless he's just trying to force bush's hand. Like you, I firmly believe bush is ultimately responsible (though I firmly believe Dick Cheney is the bastard that is responsible for the policy), and if bush were a responsible person, he wouldn't say that the intel was faulty, and then keep the man responsible (Tenet) on the job.

bush is trying to have it both ways, and maybe Kerry is trying to force him to say the CIA is/isn't responsible, or to force bush to protect Tenet the way he did after 9/11 when Senator Shelby was calling for Tenet's resignation.

I don't really know, except I do know that what politicians say often means something else entirely.

If others were to join in calling for his resignation, it might force Tenet out, bush might have to cut him lose just to keep the controversy quiet. How would the agency respond to that? How would Tenet respond?

I think what's happening here is more politically motivated on Kerry's part than it is an outright call for Tenet's resignation. My guess is Kerry believes the same thing you and I do, and that he's just trying to get bush backed into a corner, or maybe he's trying to get Tenet to distance himself from bush.

Politics can be quite subtle, and it's always best to look beyond the mere words, and look for the motives of the speaker & the effects the words might have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgpenn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
25. Kerry has shown he will defend *Bush
Remember the deserter comments by Michael Moore. kerry called them "over the top". here he finds no problem shooting the innocent and letting the criminal roam at larger!

Kerry as pres. is a scarey thing for me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upfront Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
30. Because
that puts the blame on the CIA and not B###. Tell you something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
31. If anyone is serious about this, WHY no mention of OSP?
Tenet could have to resign because he didn't fight OSP, if ANYONE would ever mention it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC